Dispute on Tuning for my Ls1.
Car: 1998 Chevy Camaro Z28 (LS1, 6spd)
Plans: Swapping stock manifolds and exhaust for Pacesetter race style LT headers and TSP Rumbler X (TD) exhaust.
Tech A Claims: The car will need to be tuned to even out the Air/fuel ratio after the installion of the LT headers. During the tune, the car may also be put on the dyno to get the HP/Torque rating. Also suggests seeing if the idle may be adjusted to a lower setting (currently runs at 1krpms during regular operating tempartures).
Tech B Claims: The car does not need tuned just because LT headers. Tune will not be needed to adjust the idle.
So, who is correct in this situation and on what part are they right on? (I got $5 riding on that I am right, so the sooner you reply the sooner I get to earn some molla.)
So do you need a tune, no, but then again you won't be getting all the performance out of your new setup either.
As for the idle, unless the car is having issues or someone already raised it (either with tuning, turning the set screw, propping open the blade, etc.) your idle is not 1000rpm. A '98 M6 LS1 is set to idle at 800rpm once warm. If you're just going by the tach then try scanning it to get the true idle speed.
No need to drop the idle lower, no point really.
Trending Topics
Now, as for Tech B stating:
What it really comes down to is, are Tech A and B in disagreement over the car benifiting from a tune or actually needing a tune? That is what makes the difference over who is right and who is wrong. Actually, A and B might both be correct, depending on what they each mean by "need".
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Need is the key word. If "need" was meant to mean "required", then the statement is wrong. Granted, the motor will almost certainly benifit from a tune, but it's not required.
Now, as for Tech B stating:
This is actually 100% correct, again assuming that "need" means "requires", as the car will not require a tune just for the exhaust change, though it will likely benifit from one.
What it really comes down to is, are Tech A and B in disagreement over the car benifiting from a tune or actually needing a tune? That is what makes the difference over who is right and who is wrong. Actually, A and B might both be correct, depending on what they each mean by "need".
I think Tech B is more correct(at least in wording) than Tech A, especially concerning the idle. Only reason your idle will change when you swap headers is when you messed up bad.
I tuned my car after adding headers, however, with HP Tuners, fwiw.
The computer will compensate for the mods both in terms of fueling (LTFTs) and idle (LTIT). However, particularly the fuel trims will not be completely accurate since they have to blanket a large part of the VE table. A proper tune will get the VE table in line and the trims will be closer to 0, making correct fueling much more accurate.
OTOH, The reason why you cant just say that a tune is mandatory is because while you stand to gain a lot from a tune with these new mods, A tune will even help out a perfectly stock car. These cars are tuned very conservitively (rich) from the factory.
If you have the means to tune the car, theres no reason why you shouldnt. However If youre wondering if you can get by without tuning but still see gains, then consider a tune unnecessary at this point.
Once you get into changing internals or injectors or any other metered flow equipment, the tune will be required.







