Positive Pressure vs. Temperature
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Dover, DE
Positive Pressure vs. Temperature New to LS1 Edit. I was playing around with my transmission settings. I'm trying to get it to shift harder. I adjusted my Positive pressure vs. Temperature to -95 for the whole chart, to actually feel a firm shift. Four questions:
1. Did I go about this the correct way?
2. Will this hurt my transmission?
3. How does this Positive Pressure vs. Temperature work?
4. What value am I changing with the -95?
1. Did I go about this the correct way?
2. Will this hurt my transmission?
3. How does this Positive Pressure vs. Temperature work?
4. What value am I changing with the -95?
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: sojourning....looking for my city whose builder and maker is God.
Re: Positive Pressure vs. Temperature </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by CorsicaLT1:
<strong>New to LS1 Edit. I was playing around with my transmission settings. I'm trying to get it to shift harder. I adjusted my Positive pressure vs. Temperature to -95 for the whole chart, to actually feel a firm shift. Four questions:
1. Did I go about this the correct way?
2. Will this hurt my transmission?
3. How does this Positive Pressure vs.
Temperature work?
4. What value am I changing with the -95?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">In the LS1 Edit manual they have a pretty good example of how to stiffen the shift points in the Positive Pressure vs. Temperature table. 0 would be the stiffest point on this chart.
I would like to know if changing the “90” on the maximum pressure to say 95, which would stiffen the “0” in the Positive Pressure vs. Temperature table?
<strong>New to LS1 Edit. I was playing around with my transmission settings. I'm trying to get it to shift harder. I adjusted my Positive pressure vs. Temperature to -95 for the whole chart, to actually feel a firm shift. Four questions:
1. Did I go about this the correct way?
2. Will this hurt my transmission?
3. How does this Positive Pressure vs.
Temperature work?
4. What value am I changing with the -95?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">In the LS1 Edit manual they have a pretty good example of how to stiffen the shift points in the Positive Pressure vs. Temperature table. 0 would be the stiffest point on this chart.
I would like to know if changing the “90” on the maximum pressure to say 95, which would stiffen the “0” in the Positive Pressure vs. Temperature table?
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Dover, DE
Re: Positive Pressure vs. Temperature I would like to know if changing the “90” on the maximum pressure to say 95, which would stiffen the “0” in the Positive Pressure vs. Temperature table?
(Good question, I'd like to know also.)
(Good question, I'd like to know also.)
Re: Positive Pressure vs. Temperature Holy cow, you made everything 90? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
So instead of ~800 MA at 24% TPS, you have 90??
I hope you're not looking for real high mileage from your tranny.
If you made your Base Pressure versus torque 90, maybe you'll be ok. I raised my table about 33%, leaving 90 as a maximum.
So instead of ~800 MA at 24% TPS, you have 90??
I hope you're not looking for real high mileage from your tranny.
If you made your Base Pressure versus torque 90, maybe you'll be ok. I raised my table about 33%, leaving 90 as a maximum.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Dover, DE
Re: Positive Pressure vs. Temperature Well, if you look at the post(s) above, I believe he was actually replying to Lady Redhawk's post. In which I was also interested in. I was still looking for answers from my original post!
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo Re: Positive Pressure vs. Temperature </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by CorsicaLT1:
<strong>Well, if you look at the post(s) above, I believe he was actually replying to Lady Redhawk's post. In which I was also interested in. I was still looking for answers from my original post!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The information applies to you to. 3 of the 4 questions are answered. The difference between 90 and 95 MA is small. MA = milliamps.
<strong>Well, if you look at the post(s) above, I believe he was actually replying to Lady Redhawk's post. In which I was also interested in. I was still looking for answers from my original post!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The information applies to you to. 3 of the 4 questions are answered. The difference between 90 and 95 MA is small. MA = milliamps.
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: Mahwah, NJ
Re: Positive Pressure vs. Temperature Ragtop,
Where did the 33% leave you at WOT... for example, my stock file is 98 at WOT I think... so did you move to like 65.6= 98 * 0.67 for WOT ?
And you even did 33% at all the low-throttle conditions?
Thanks,
Dean
Where did the 33% leave you at WOT... for example, my stock file is 98 at WOT I think... so did you move to like 65.6= 98 * 0.67 for WOT ?
And you even did 33% at all the low-throttle conditions?
Thanks,
Dean
Re: Positive Pressure vs. Temperature Sunset:
I did not go above above 90, so if the change would have caused me to go above 90, I replaced that cell with 90. On the low end, I left below 50 at zero and start with around 10 at 60 and let it build from there. All values are 90 by 230 ft-lbs. I may make it so all values are 90 by 200 ft-lbs or even 150 ft-lbs, but I haven't messed with it in a while.
I did not go above above 90, so if the change would have caused me to go above 90, I replaced that cell with 90. On the low end, I left below 50 at zero and start with around 10 at 60 and let it build from there. All values are 90 by 230 ft-lbs. I may make it so all values are 90 by 200 ft-lbs or even 150 ft-lbs, but I haven't messed with it in a while.
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
From: Mahwah, NJ
Re: Positive Pressure vs. Temperature Thanks Ragtop... no I see my confusion- you're talking about the base pressure vs. torque table, not the postive pressure table... So, did you not mess with your positive pressure vs. temp table at all, and still get what you feel is satisfactory improvement in firmness? If you did change that table too, what did you do? I'm very hesitant to follow the ls1edit manual, as it puts much of the upper end of the table at zero.
Regarding the base pressure vs. torque table, leaving a maximum of 90 only really changes the 2nd and 3rd gear (1st gear isn't there and 4th is already 90...).. do these changes override what goes on in the other table?
Thanks much for your reply(ies). P.S. any ideas on my post on the timing table... when you bump timing, do you change those lower total timing values at the higher gm/cyl levels, or only where timing is more 'normal' in the twenties?
Regarding the base pressure vs. torque table, leaving a maximum of 90 only really changes the 2nd and 3rd gear (1st gear isn't there and 4th is already 90...).. do these changes override what goes on in the other table?
Thanks much for your reply(ies). P.S. any ideas on my post on the timing table... when you bump timing, do you change those lower total timing values at the higher gm/cyl levels, or only where timing is more 'normal' in the twenties?