Ping on stock tune??
http://mysite.verizon.net/whenn1/1.30.06aKR.csv
http://mysite.verizon.net/whenn1/1.30.06bKR.csv
http://mysite.verizon.net/whenn1/1.30.06cKR.csv
commanded at 14.6:1; that seems to me to be well into
where power enrichment might want applied (and then
more spark, maximizing output at some expense to fuel
economy).
Also see ECT is rising up during / after this first part throttle
pull, indicating the coolant system is not under control. That
appears not to be the root of the problem, but perhaps a
contributor at times?
Next event seems to have no good reason, the PE is in before
KR hits, spark is pretty low advance. Multiple hits. I'd wonder
about mechanical noise as a possible issue.
There seems to be either substantial PE mode enable MAP
hysteresis, or delay; I see the AFR going back to stoich
well after the TPS and MAP have dropped. I wonder about
the intrinsic lag in the knock sensor, KR "path" and by how
much the KR event might lag the actual trigger. Perhaps
the problem is in the tip-in and KR just shows up late.
Also peculiar, how KR just "disappears" (1.8, 2.3, 2.2, 2.2, 0?)
about line 1990. Not used to seeing that. It makes me think
something's flaky.
Some wisps of tip-in KR, TPS open followed by lean dip and
then knock.
The first real WOT pull, see substantial KR. I have to question
the relation of real fueling to commanded because at 11.7:1
I only see 850mV, sometimes less, on the NBO2s. I would have
expected, and have seen higher mV on my stock-logs setup
with a higher AFR (12.7:1 gave me 875mV or so (but now
-way- higher with headers). I wonder what a MAF cleaning
would do (K&N in mod list, but I may have already given that
lecture I think?). Has it been done lately? His dynamic cylinder
air just reads a whole lot lower than mine, (.69, vs my 0.8x
at MAP=100kPa? That's some discrepancy, reinforces my MAF
suspicion).
That's only about halfway through the "a" log and I have to
get back to work... but food for thought, anyway.
Last edited by rgaynor85; Jan 31, 2006 at 07:00 PM.
Trending Topics
Oil consumption is a issue I run into often on the LS1's. if your pulling alot of oil threw the intake it will make the car ping in no time.
I owned a 01 Z28 that would audibly ping on the factory tune. The damn thing was fast as hell (12.7 with just airlid/catback.. no gears or anything else) AFR was good on the dyno, timing was like around 21-22 but I did know it was pulling oil up threw the intake.
Sadly a 18 wheeler hit it on the freeway and totalled it.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Last edited by rgaynor85; Feb 1, 2006 at 08:29 AM.
blade) and through the PCV makeup air port in the TB.
That one "should" be flowing in toward the crankcase but
I'm convinced at WOT with blowby it can reverse and then
you will have a snail track from the port down one side of
the TB throat.
I would be very interested to see what happens from -only-
cleaning the MAF, to your dynamic cylinder air numbers.
And then from swapping on a dead-unmolested stocker.
The first being quantitative results for the "K&N oil is bad"
effect and the second, the effect of descreening. Make
with the science, chop-chop.
One log with a full 2nd gearpull as-is, one cleaned, one swapped. Then on to the PCV
oil question, with the SeaFoam.
change dirty/clean made.
The one I told you about htat pinged on the stock tune had a stock fitler in it.
Also, quite a few cars we test drove pinged audibly at wide open. I think the gas is a bit crappy here or something.


