Open loop PE?
PE for coolant temp is to add 15% fuel and PE for RPM is to add 0% to 8%. These would make sense for a AFR start-off point of 14.7. But if the open loop at 100 MAP is 12.9, it would be too rich. But I guess you make sense
Originally Posted by Sotiri
PE for coolant temp is to add 15% fuel and PE for RPM is to add 0% to 8%. These would make sense for a AFR start-off point of 14.7. But if the open loop at 100 MAP is 12.9, it would be too rich. But I guess you make sense
You are technically in open loop mode, since the o2 data is thrown out.
The computer takes its fueling values from whichever is richer: The OLFA table (x-referenced by ECT & MAP) or PE (x-referenced by RPM). I have my OLFA table set to all 1.00's from 178* on up, that way WOT always gets it fueling from PE.
The computer takes its fueling values from whichever is richer: The OLFA table (x-referenced by ECT & MAP) or PE (x-referenced by RPM). I have my OLFA table set to all 1.00's from 178* on up, that way WOT always gets it fueling from PE.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by GuitsBoy
You are technically in open loop mode, since the o2 data is thrown out.
The computer takes its fueling values from whichever is richer: The OLFA table (x-referenced by ECT & MAP) or PE (x-referenced by RPM). I have my OLFA table set to all 1.00's from 178* on up, that way WOT always gets it fueling from PE.
The computer takes its fueling values from whichever is richer: The OLFA table (x-referenced by ECT & MAP) or PE (x-referenced by RPM). I have my OLFA table set to all 1.00's from 178* on up, that way WOT always gets it fueling from PE.



