SD vs. MAF
thx
MAF tune - advantage = a lot of fidelity in adjusting the fuel compared to the airflow. That's why the EPA likes them.
There's more to it, but them's the basics.
Everyone else seems to think that the final tuning of the MAF is easier. I think tuning the VE table was WAY easier.
Tuning the VE table, I get my LTFTs perfect (-2) for ALL part throttle scenarios. My throttle response and TQ feels great.
Set my MAF to the dynamic airflow. Then turn the MAF back on....... Car goes way rich at idle and under 3k rpms. LTFTs are all over the place (way negative below 3k, positve on decel). And the car feels much slower.
Maybe I'll get it right after messing with it some more. I dunno. I'm sure it would be easier with a wideband.
Here's something I added along those lines concerning cars that don't max the MAF or switch to air calculation until 4000 like most LS1s.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/pcm-diagnostics-tuning/503987-mafless.html
But then I guess everyone knows I'm a MAF hater

Trending Topics
Wow, all you need now is one of those turbo-thingies.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time



