? on KR and timing
#21
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: Farmingville, New York
Yeah, that sounds about right, but it's just not working out for me. My times weren't affected before, so I guess I'll have to wait to get to E-Town to see how it fares with the gears and headers.
#22
You need to monitor your actual AFR to make sure you are getting the correct fueling first before worrying too much about timing.
Once you know WOT fueling is good (Which will require you to tune your ve table and check your MAF calibration) then you are right to check timing.
You can also run a CAI and Cooler t'stat which will help raise timing a little.
Main problem with too little timing is that most of the combustion pressure is wasted as the piston has past the best point for max break torque in the bore.
Once your timing is set optimal then recheck fueling as changes in timing will affect AFR, so a few itterations of the process will be required.
Once you know WOT fueling is good (Which will require you to tune your ve table and check your MAF calibration) then you are right to check timing.
You can also run a CAI and Cooler t'stat which will help raise timing a little.
Main problem with too little timing is that most of the combustion pressure is wasted as the piston has past the best point for max break torque in the bore.
Once your timing is set optimal then recheck fueling as changes in timing will affect AFR, so a few itterations of the process will be required.
#26
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: Farmingville, New York
Just a quick update on this old thread. I took the car to East Side Performance and had it dyno'd. Well, 377 RWHP seems pretty good to me. The guys over there were a little surprised at the numbers as well. I think I'll leave well enough alone and not worry about the timing. We left it at 16* and those are the numbers we got.