PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

question about wot multiplyer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2006, 04:09 PM
  #41  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,150
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I agree using lambda makes sense, well at least to me. As this is how Ford does thier calibration for fuel as well.

Ryan
Old 09-10-2006, 05:44 PM
  #42  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by onfire
I'm just kidding Kevin.

Seems like I'm the only one using lambda...it's easier for me since my wideband reads lambda and you know 1.0 = 14.67 Less than 1.0 is richer, greater than 1.0 is leaner...pretty intuitive way to tune, but not popular.
I see two different methods in this thread.. one says to divide stoich by a value to reach a desired a/f, then enter that value into the PE modifier rpm cell. Then another says to multiply stoich by a value, then enter that value into the PE modifier cell.

14.67 (stoich) x 0.88 = 12.9 commanded A/F

...or...

14.67 (stoich) / 1.14 = 12.9 commanded a/f

Value in bold is what is input into the PE Modifier RPM cell.
Old 09-11-2006, 12:06 PM
  #43  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (35)
 
bowtieman81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland/Illinois
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The computer divides 14.7 by whatever is in the PE cell. So, if you put in 1.35, then the computer will try to get an a/f of 10.89:1.

I will throw my 2 bits in. I am currently one of those turbo guys using 1bar MAF setup. It works, and works good. However, I have not maxed out the MAF yet. My PE values are not rediculous, most of them are 1.35. Right now I see no reason for a 2 bar setup.
Old 09-11-2006, 12:13 PM
  #44  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
SSpdDmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Commerce Twp, MI
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrkPhx
I see two different methods in this thread.. one says to divide stoich by a value to reach a desired a/f, then enter that value into the PE modifier rpm cell. Then another says to multiply stoich by a value, then enter that value into the PE modifier cell.

14.67 (stoich) x 0.88 = 12.9 commanded A/F

...or...

14.67 (stoich) / 1.14 = 12.9 commanded a/f

Value in bold is what is input into the PE Modifier RPM cell.
To continue your point...the smaller bolded number is lambda. The larger bolded number is EQ Ratio. Depending on the units you have set in your tables (or the units they are defaulted to), you pick the appropriate format. The EQ ratio is calculated as 1/lambda and the AFR is calc'd just as you have it above.
Old 09-11-2006, 10:36 PM
  #45  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SSpdDmon
To continue your point...the smaller bolded number is lambda. The larger bolded number is EQ Ratio. Depending on the units you have set in your tables (or the units they are defaulted to), you pick the appropriate format. The EQ ratio is calculated as 1/lambda and the AFR is calc'd just as you have it above.
Thanks. I use EFIlive and oddly enough mine shows lambda while most show EQ Ratio.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM.