Changing from a 2bar map to a 3bar map?
A 3 bar cant see anything below 100kpa. So regular driving when not in boost will not be adustable unless you use a MAF
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
1 bar is -44.1psi to -14.7. So if you add atmospheric pressure to that " which we all do" it is -30 to 0
3 bar is -14.7psi to 44.1psi, BUT AFTER YOU TAKE AWAY ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE it is only 0 to 30 psi on our car....
The GM# 12223861 (From the 1989TTA) is still a valid part number and is the best 3 bar map they make due to the lower kPa resolution. This map will read from 40 to 304 kPa. Good for 28psi of boost and since it does read below 100kpa it should tune in ok for part throttle. Go here for the tech specs.
http://www.powerandsignal.com/docs/P...s/12223861.pdf

the PCM needs to know that the 5v range on a one bar = 105kpa and that 5v on a 2 bar =210kpa, etc.
in other words, you need a different OS, to match the calibration of the sensor.
(I know I might have my signs and range messed up, but you get the idea)
so if you slap a 2 bar sensor in a 1 bar OS PCM car, when you hit 105kpa MAP, the PCM will expect to see 5v, but instead will see 2.5v, and think your only at 55kpa or whatever (im assuming the relationship between volts and kpa is linear, if not shoot me)
Fire shooting out of the tailpipes.....roasted 2 pet kittens
Actually all is good. Biggest tip is to get the scalar set to key on engine off to your actual kPa. It was only a little richer than the 2bar at part throttle. Dead on at WOT. Drove great on the 2bar tune....I'll fine tune it tomorrow.
Delphi 3bar part number 12223861 sold by Speed Inc under the FAST brand and many others...great low end resolution.....don't waste your time or money on a 2 bar map like I did.
If someone has a clear answer why to use 2 bar over 3 I'd like to know for my own sanity.
ps im not arguing the point, I'd actually like to have the answers to this stuff as well as others im sure
Think of it exactly like the secondary VE table we have. Using that to tune for a big motor and boost.
We have the main cells there, but the resolution sucks. Same thing goes for map sensors. if you use one that is out of the range of your vehicle then it is harder to get correct in the full area. 0-5 volts is all it has to spread itself accross. So the more you have to shove into that area the harder it is to correct.
Think of it exactly like the secondary VE table we have. Using that to tune for a big motor and boost.
We have the main cells there, but the resolution sucks. Same thing goes for map sensors. if you use one that is out of the range of your vehicle then it is harder to get correct in the full area. 0-5 volts is all it has to spread itself accross. So the more you have to shove into that area the harder it is to correct.
Think of it exactly like the secondary VE table we have. Using that to tune for a big motor and boost.
We have the main cells there, but the resolution sucks. Same thing goes for map sensors. if you use one that is out of the range of your vehicle then it is harder to get correct in the full area. 0-5 volts is all it has to spread itself accross. So the more you have to shove into that area the harder it is to correct.
But your post number 5 is wrong. I have the engineering drawing from Delphi on this map sensor.(#12223861)
You're saying a 3bar map will not read below 100kPa. This one is rated down to 40kPa and reads down to 25kPa in my car. Obviously, if all you want is 14.7psi a 20 to 200kPa (2bar) map is all you'll need and if you want a commanded cruise AF of 14.7:1 to be absolutely perfect a 2bar map is better at the final 0.10 digit. However, If 14.6:1 works for ya even though you've commanded 14.7 , this 3 bar is fine. It's rated at 40 to 304kPa. What VooDoo can you use with a 2bar at 20psi....back to RPM vs PE????????





