Ass backwards IFR table???
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
*** backwards IFR table??? I just used the IFR spreadsheet thats in the sticky. The values in the sheet go from 0-80 Kpa and the values go upward. My IFR table starts out at 100Kpa and goes down to 0. Why is it *** backward and what can i do to properly scale for 42lb injectors. I am 
right now. Attached is a screen shot of my IFR table in LS1 Edit. How the hell am i going to scale this right in my goofy table?
I need to get some new ******* software and flash a SD OS.
right now. Attached is a screen shot of my IFR table in LS1 Edit. How the hell am i going to scale this right in my goofy table?I need to get some new ******* software and flash a SD OS.
Assuming your 42lbers are rated at 40psi and your fuel pressure is 58psi, you need to scale your injector table up 91% across the board over the stock values. 80kPa on manifold vacuum (~21kPa on MAP) should be close to 6.98grams/second. If they're rated at 43.5psi, then you would only scale up ~83.5%.
It's hard to tell if LS1 Edit refers the injectors against manifold vacuum or MAP. Just so you know, MAP equals atmosphere (current Baro) minus manifold vacuum. Either way, a straight %-age increase should work fine.
It's hard to tell if LS1 Edit refers the injectors against manifold vacuum or MAP. Just so you know, MAP equals atmosphere (current Baro) minus manifold vacuum. Either way, a straight %-age increase should work fine.
Last edited by SSpdDmon; Mar 5, 2007 at 10:36 AM.
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
the table is MAP referenced, it just starts out with 100Kpa but the Gms/sec starts out low. I think the cells are just backwards. Take a look at the screenshot I attached above and you will see what I mean.
the injectors are 42 lbs @ 3 bar
the injectors are 42 lbs @ 3 bar
Originally Posted by brad8266
the table is MAP referenced, it just starts out with 100Kpa but the Gms/sec starts out low. I think the cells are just backwards. Take a look at the screenshot I attached above and you will see what I mean.
the injectors are 42 lbs @ 3 bar
the injectors are 42 lbs @ 3 bar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Originally Posted by SSpdDmon
I'd up the values by 83.5% across the board then. The 0kPa cell in the spreadsheet should roughly match the 100kPa cell in LS1 Edit. If you calculate the difference between what the spreadsheet outputs and the stock values, they should be (using 43.5psi) a linear change of 83~84% higher than stock.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
