Possible to run MAF/SD Tune
Last edited by Earl H; May 6, 2007 at 12:58 AM.
Its just with SD there are more tables and cells affecting the tune so guys who find it hard to get out of bed just tune the single column of MAF values and say "SD is no good".
When in fact as Doc and others have mentioned there is no problems running SD all the time, throttle response is improved because the MAF is actually inaccurate at low airflows and is blended with SD until 4000rpm anyway.
I vote drop the MAF altogether and learn the way of the SD for your app.
Afterall millions of efi Hemi engines cant be wrong. They are SD from factory!
Its just with SD there are more tables and cells affecting the tune so guys who find it hard to get out of bed just tune the single column of MAF values and say "SD is no good".
When in fact as Doc and others have mentioned there is no problems running SD all the time, throttle response is improved because the MAF is actually inaccurate at low airflows and is blended with SD until 4000rpm anyway.
I vote drop the MAF altogether and learn the way of the SD for your app.
Afterall millions of efi Hemi engines cant be wrong. They are SD from factory!
Trending Topics
Why not try SD for a while and see what you think. You can always go back to Maf if you dont work it out.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
SD only is not superior for the non tuner. With SD you can't adapt. The car is set at WOT. With MAF it can sense the incoming air charge and adapt slightly at WOT.
I am sure that is all he wants.
Maybe you could hook some normally closed mirco switch on the gas petal. That would cut the MAF at WOT. Surely would go back to SD.
SD only is not superior for the non tuner. With SD you can't adapt. The car is set at WOT. With MAF it can sense the incoming air charge and adapt slightly at WOT.
I am sure that is all he wants.
Maybe you could hook some normally closed mirco switch on the gas petal. That would cut the MAF at WOT. Surely would go back to SD.
Bottom line is if you want the best throttle response and no upper limit then go SD. If you want an easy to maintain tune with the same pk power as SD (assuming you are under the MAF limit) then go MAF. MAF is best for people who dont tune as it adapts to small changes without needing another expensive tune. Guess why the factory uses it!
If you have a tune tool and/or are interested in the best driving experience then SD is for you. Yes you need to tweak the tune for that new manifold, or exhaust, but you want the best performance anyway dont you? Otherwise why did you modify your car in the first place!?
Guys, I'm not looking to debate which is better. SD probably is. Problem is, I've got a track day in a little while. I have a limited amount of time and wanted to get the tune nailed to the best of my ability with my current contraints.
But in general yes you are right. However PE with no MAF is based on the VE table, which finished at 1Bar so if you want to fuel accurately you need a 2bar+ OS with an accurate VE to take over when the MAF runs out of steam. Otherwise you just make an educated guess as to how much fuel you need past that point and throw the same amount in irrespective of what it actually needs.
Once you get your head around the VE table and SD its easy. If you insist on using the MAF you are stuck with it and using PE to throw a random amount of fuel in to bandaid it. But loads of other guys do it that way with good results, its just not the best way IMO.
Justin






