VE Correction
When I tuned my VE table, I set the VE correction uppper and lower limits to 1.001 and .999 respectively to essentially take VE correction out of the equation. I then re-enabled my MAF and got my fueling inline with the MAF enabled. Now I decided to set the VE correction limits back to stock, and all of a sudden my fueling is completely jacked up. Im hitting AFRs of 18:1 at idle. How can I log VE correction to try and square things up?
Anyway, the VE table was tuned in SD (MAF Unplugged) with the correction factor effectively disabled (set limits close to 1). I then tuned it using the MAF and got that in line. Then when I set the VE correction limits back to stock, the tune went out of whack.
But now that I understand what youre saying, yes, im quite familiar with the process.
Although may I suggest this to you for future: I find its easier to set your LTFTs to 0 and lock them, then just log STFT averages. Much quicker process, and better resolution, since youre not locked into FTCs.VE correction is somthing a little more advanced than basic VE table tuning. The correction factor is a multiplier thats used by the ECU to get dynamic airflow and your maf readings to match. Lets say your MAF is telling you that your flowing 2.5 g/sec, but your dynamic airflow reads 2.0 g/sec (based off of VE and rpm). The computer would [supposedly] adopt a VE correction of 1.25. Heres an equation: [Dyn Air] x [VE correction] = [MAF].
My question is that if the VE and the MAF tables were dialed in, why would the VE corection stray so far from 1.000 once it was re-enabled?
Last edited by GuitsBoy; May 7, 2008 at 11:35 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I disabled the MAF again to check my speed density tune, and so far everything seems normal in SD world.






