VE table vs Tip -In
08-18-2003, 11:24 AM
#2
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Richmond, VA Where fast cars, well......are hard to come by.
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: VE table vs Tip -In Hmmm. Good idea. 
I seem to remember someone on the mailing list say they read some technical papers on the pcm system, and it said that the maf is inaccurate at larger throttle changes. Maybe it reverts to the VE table until tps becomes consistent?
I seem to remember someone on the mailing list say they read some technical papers on the pcm system, and it said that the maf is inaccurate at larger throttle changes. Maybe it reverts to the VE table until tps becomes consistent?
08-18-2003, 10:20 PM
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Re: VE table vs Tip -In It might, but it seems that having normal slight negative LTFTs also solves this straightforwardly
at least for me.
There will be some internal loop lag within the
MAF as it works on a thermal time scale. But you
can cover it "well enough" by having a naturally
rich calculation & sensor combo. Whether you need
to mess VE around, or just diddle power enrichment
I don't know, but PE has worked for my stockish
vehicle.
at least for me.
There will be some internal loop lag within the
MAF as it works on a thermal time scale. But you
can cover it "well enough" by having a naturally
rich calculation & sensor combo. Whether you need
to mess VE around, or just diddle power enrichment
I don't know, but PE has worked for my stockish
vehicle.