GTO vs Mach 1
04-24-2004, 09:34 PM
#21
Administrator
People make such a big deal about fbodies and Mustangs. Sure, they can be fast. BUT, they are still only $20K-$35K POS's IMO. They are plastic rattle traps that have strong drivetrains.
05-24-2005, 09:40 PM
#22
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just bought me a new 2003 Mach 1, i have to say i love it to death, i traded in my lightning for it. the main selling point on the Mach over GTO was the live rear axle. they are both awesome cars, and deserve alot of repect. i CANT STAND the people that bash the hell outa other models just because they own one. both are very nice, but i wish i had the quality interior the GTO has, gotta love those seats
06-03-2005, 04:45 PM
#28
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by roger
not more fuel effecient,my mach mileage is the same as the camaro and t/a's.
...and yes i'll keep my 4 cams,they seem to work fine for me.
i think its nice getting comparable numbers with a engine that feels more refined and uses less cubes and 10 degrees lees duration on the cams.....but its just my daily driver 
...and yes i'll keep my 4 cams,they seem to work fine for me.
i think its nice getting comparable numbers with a engine that feels more refined and uses less cubes and 10 degrees lees duration on the cams.....but its just my daily driver Last edited by GMCVT; 06-03-2005 at 05:00 PM.
