cable vs. drive by wire?
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cable vs. drive by wire?
Hi, I'm considering to buy a GTO again after I lost my 04a4 and wondering about pros&cons about cable vs. drive by wire, personally I really liked the cable TB because of less electronic/sensor interference no electronic TM kickin in. I believe the computer in the Ls1 is alot simpler than the Ls2s but I could be wrong........Input from anybody here would be greatly appreciated
PS I know the Ls2s have 400hp/400tq but I really don't like the idea of the 90mm TB in the Ls2 to only open up maximum of 88% at WOT.I want to use my muscle mechanicly not electronically but again maybe I'm missing something about the Ls2 and you guys can shed some light on me thanx. And I got my aftermarket parts for Ls1 gto from my old one which ran me PB 12.8@109mph.
PS I know the Ls2s have 400hp/400tq but I really don't like the idea of the 90mm TB in the Ls2 to only open up maximum of 88% at WOT.I want to use my muscle mechanicly not electronically but again maybe I'm missing something about the Ls2 and you guys can shed some light on me thanx. And I got my aftermarket parts for Ls1 gto from my old one which ran me PB 12.8@109mph.
#3
90mm in of corse going to be better. But its the cable action that is much better. I bought my car in April 2005. It is a 2004 M-6. I bought the 04' because I hated the responce of the fly-by-wire. Even when one is tuned, it still isn't like a cable actuated throttle.
There is tourqe management on both. Even the 6 speeds. Which ever car you get, just get a good tuning shop to tune the car. It wil be a much differant car once properly calibrated. Both thypes of throttles.
There is tourqe management on both. Even the 6 speeds. Which ever car you get, just get a good tuning shop to tune the car. It wil be a much differant car once properly calibrated. Both thypes of throttles.
#6
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bergen Co, NJ
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
from Wikipedia:
"....Contrary to popular belief, except in concert with other technologies such as gasoline direct injection, ETC provides only a very limited benefit in areas such as air-fuel ratio control, exhaust emissions and fuel consumption reduction. ETC however makes it much easier to integrate features to the vehicle such as cruise control, traction control, stability control and others that require torque management, since the throttle can be moved irrespective of the position of the driver's accelerator pedal. A criticism of the very early ETC implementations was that they were "overruling" driver decisions. Nowadays, the vast majority of drivers have no idea how much intervention is happening.
Much of the engineering involved with drive-by-wire technologies including ETC deals with failure and fault management. Most ETC systems have sensor and controller redundancy, even as complex as independent microprocessors with independently written software within a control module whose calculations are compared to check for possible errors and faults."
So....
Is DBW better? No not really. Is DBW less safe? No not really? Will you notice DBW? No not really. It's just alot easier to integrate into the PCM/BCM.
"....Contrary to popular belief, except in concert with other technologies such as gasoline direct injection, ETC provides only a very limited benefit in areas such as air-fuel ratio control, exhaust emissions and fuel consumption reduction. ETC however makes it much easier to integrate features to the vehicle such as cruise control, traction control, stability control and others that require torque management, since the throttle can be moved irrespective of the position of the driver's accelerator pedal. A criticism of the very early ETC implementations was that they were "overruling" driver decisions. Nowadays, the vast majority of drivers have no idea how much intervention is happening.
Much of the engineering involved with drive-by-wire technologies including ETC deals with failure and fault management. Most ETC systems have sensor and controller redundancy, even as complex as independent microprocessors with independently written software within a control module whose calculations are compared to check for possible errors and faults."
So....
Is DBW better? No not really. Is DBW less safe? No not really? Will you notice DBW? No not really. It's just alot easier to integrate into the PCM/BCM.
#7
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cammed06 (ls2gto)
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doc has an 04 M6 with over 600rwhp. I have an 06 M6 with over 600rwhp. We both drive well. I can outshift my DBW and so can Doc, but he has no issues with his 04 cable. If you are going to be doing drag racing, get the 04, IMO. And, if you already have some mods, there you go. If you get an A4, get the LS2, though. There are alot of GTO's for sale on the LS2GTO forum.
Trending Topics
#8
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edwards AFB, CA
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love my cable. I also would love to have the extra space that the LS2 guys have because the DBW setup eliminates the Cruse Control module, Throttle relaxer module, the computer is smaller and the coolant tank is gone. A good friend of mine has his LS2 car tuned and it feels like a cable driven car.
#10
#11
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
on the other hand why does every muscle/drag car operate with cable?? That many can't be wrong.....just my 1/2cent.lol.
#12
I would also like to add something. I have modded tons of cars. (customers cars as well as my own) I have driven and built 600 FWHP 402 with fly by wire. They are responsive. But that's alot of power talking. I am not talking from my ***. But from my experiances from building and driving many GTO's.
#14
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From a purely mechanical standpoint, 05-06 GTO's have better heads, a marginally better intake, a better TB, more displacement, etc...so start there if you want a 50hp lead from the get-go, and a platform for mods down the road.
I personally am quite fond of LS1's however.
#15
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cammed06 (ls2gto)
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're planning to mod to 600rwhp, obviously, it would be easier to achieve with the LS2.
Free advice: Plan to mod that high? Get another A4. 600 rwhp A4=10's, no problem. 600rwhp M6= learn how to launch, REALLY good.
Free advice: Plan to mod that high? Get another A4. 600 rwhp A4=10's, no problem. 600rwhp M6= learn how to launch, REALLY good.
#16
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alright guys thanx for all the good info, by the sounds of it there all good Ls1/Ls2 with m6 or a4 its all personal preference, you guys are all FAST!! I've made up my mind its going to be the rare purple 04a4.
ps getting the custom painted/purple magnacharger to match the car, just wanted to share that with you guys.
ps getting the custom painted/purple magnacharger to match the car, just wanted to share that with you guys.
#18
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edwards AFB, CA
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts