Intake Manifold Flow Tests: LS1, LS6, TBSS, BBK, Dorman LS2, 102 Fast LSXRT & more
Anyways to me the BBK looks to be a descent intake over the LS6 or stock LS1 if your just building a street car. But I'm very curious to see this dorman intake run on the dyno.
Fitment is often an issue due to height.
LSXR below. Smaller plenum area. Fits many more applications. Fits 4th gen food with minor issue in some cases. Can be fitted to C5 and C6 Corvette with some effort.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
1) flow an ls6 with the stock 78mm (mine measures 75mm) throttle body.
2) Flow other intakes with the same small throttle body. (Adapter needed)
3) flow the ls6 with a bigger throttle body and the adapter so that argument I've seen all over can be laid to rest.
I can contribute a little bit to this test as I have an adapter to put a bigger throttle body on the ls6 intake if you need it. I was considering buying the dorman ls2 intake and I'll have my ls6 intake I can send in for testing if you don't have one. Let me know.
Looks very similar to the LSXrt with a smaller TB opening. Update: my plan to use the cylinder heads used in this test on the ERL 416 didn't work out. When the 416 is completed with LS3 heads etc, I can get back to the flow testing if the shop has time available on the flow bench. So the same heads can be used for more testing. Test 2 ended up on hold due to the 416 engine.
I want to test an LS6 intake. I don't have one. I hope we can work something out.
The Dorman version of the TBSS would be interesting to test and compare to the OEM TBSS.
The Fast LSXR and LSX really would be nice to test.
Bigger 92mm TB with adapter on a standard snout ~75-78mm intake : we can do one test.
Flow testing has its limits.
The ultimate testing is engine dyno testing and track testing. Remember when other parts are changed in the combination the results change to so we're getting a baseline to help make better choices not an ultimate answer. Example my Peak ported LS6 TPiS 90mm snout intake dominated the Fast LSX & LSXR intake under 6500 rpm in peak numbers and area under the curve for hp and torque on my small (229/229) cam stroker on the same day at the same dyno with same aire and water temperature. We also know that over 6000 rpm with a bigger cam (236/242 or 244/250 for example) that would make power higher in the rpm range both of the Fast intakes would have dominated the tricked out LS6.
Update: my plan to use the cylinder heads used in this test on the ERL 416 didn't work out. When the 416 is completed with LS3 heads etc, I can get back to the flow testing if the shop has time available on the flow bench. So the same heads can be used for more testing. Test 2 ended up on hold due to the 416 engine.
I want to test an LS6 intake. I don't have one. I hope we can work something out.
The Dorman version of the TBSS would be interesting to test and compare to the OEM TBSS.
The Fast LSXR and LSX really would be nice to test.
Bigger 92mm TB with adapter on a standard snout ~75-78mm intake : we can do one test.
Flow testing has its limits.
The ultimate testing is engine dyno testing and track testing. Remember when other parts are changed in the combination the results change to so we're getting a baseline to help make better choices not an ultimate answer. Example my Peak ported LS6 TPiS 90mm snout intake dominated the Fast LSX & LSXR intake under 6500 rpm in peak numbers and area under the curve for hp and torque on my small (229/229) cam stroker on the same day at the same dyno with same aire and water temperature. We also know that over 6000 rpm with a bigger cam (236/242 or 244/250 for example) that would make power higher in the rpm range both of the Fast intakes would have dominated the tricked out LS6.
Lift_______head_____ LS1(w/o EGR)___TBSS_____Dorman LS2___FAST LSXRT
.100_______64.4_______62.4____________59.2_____61_ ____________64.3
.200______134.5______127____________127.2____127.8 __________134.4
.300______198________174____________179______182.6 __________191
.400______246.5______211____________218.1____225.8 __________235
.450______267________221____________230.2____237.8 __________248
.500______281________230.2__________240.1____247.6 __________260
.550______295.8______238.5__________250.1____248.5 __________270.2
.600______305________242.1__________256.6____252.9 __________278
.650______285________244.3__________261.8____254.6 __________282.3
Note the WARR 92mm TB was used on all intakes manifolds except the LS1manifold. The WARR 92mm TB provided a smooth transition to snout of the various manifolds. The TB blade was zip tied open.










