2013 E/P/T C6ZRJuan vs 2010 E/P/T/B/G GT500
#141
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![](https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/ls1tech.com-vbulletin/1120x2000/screenshot_2017_05_17_08_24_27_6ce53ed3f9aa8c0c57549e7677d67955c573c14a.png)
You see anything to do with cfm there you dumb ****?
It's obvious he has no clue.
#143
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Actually the ls has been faster than both by alot na. Of ehich if you noticed i was speaking na.
Once boost happens it's far more about the tuner than the engine. Na is all about the engine and what it can do with out help.
Once boost happens it's far more about the tuner than the engine. Na is all about the engine and what it can do with out help.
#145
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You admit that the LS cannot hold up to a modular with the same boost correct?
So the LS is therefore a mechanically inferior engine at is has been slower overall and can't get close to the mod motor.
You said it yourself.
#146
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Maybe it has gone faster than a modular (2v,3v 4v) of the past, haven't looked at their times. But last I checked the fastest NA Honda was a Frankenstein K series in a 14-1600 shell hatch running somewhere around 9.9. There are NA coyotes going mid to bottom 9s in a fox.
Last edited by BlkMach1; 05-17-2017 at 10:38 AM.
#148
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So was this thread about NA cars or about blower cars?
You admit that the LS cannot hold up to a modular with the same boost correct?
So the LS is therefore a mechanically inferior engine at is has been slower overall and can't get close to the mod motor.
You said it yourself.
You admit that the LS cannot hold up to a modular with the same boost correct?
So the LS is therefore a mechanically inferior engine at is has been slower overall and can't get close to the mod motor.
You said it yourself.
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
The dude is cool, he just don't want any more L's from a POS stang I guess. lol
#149
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Are you jumping on this BS that's all over Facebook that a NA Honda has gone faster than an NA coyote?
Maybe it has gone faster than a modular (2v,3v 4v) of the past, haven't looked at their times. But last I checked the fastest NA Honda was a Frankenstein K series in a 14-1600 shell hatch running somewhere around 9.9. There are NA coyotes going mid to bottom 9s in a fox.
Maybe it has gone faster than a modular (2v,3v 4v) of the past, haven't looked at their times. But last I checked the fastest NA Honda was a Frankenstein K series in a 14-1600 shell hatch running somewhere around 9.9. There are NA coyotes going mid to bottom 9s in a fox.
#150
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Again, I don't expect you to understand, but... Pressure from the atmosphere is created because there is a certain amount of air above us, to be at the same "atmosphere" you need the same amount of air=same amount of cfm. same boost does NOT equal the same amount of air.
Good talk, see you out there.
and LOL that you google atmospheric pressure and then call me dumb.
Last edited by zz4camaro1980; 05-17-2017 at 12:14 PM.
#152
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So was this thread about NA cars or about blower cars?
You admit that the LS cannot hold up to a modular with the same boost correct?
So the LS is therefore a mechanically inferior engine at is has been slower overall and can't get close to the mod motor.
You said it yourself.
You admit that the LS cannot hold up to a modular with the same boost correct?
So the LS is therefore a mechanically inferior engine at is has been slower overall and can't get close to the mod motor.
You said it yourself.
oh, he mad! you have been on here for years sounding like a broken record, don't you have anything better to do?
Again, I don't expect you to understand, but... Pressure from the atmosphere is created because there is a certain amount of air above us, to be at the same "atmosphere" you need the same amount of air=same amount of cfm. same boost does NOT equal the same amount of air.
Good talk, see you out there.
and LOL that you google atmospheric pressure and then call me dumb.
Again, I don't expect you to understand, but... Pressure from the atmosphere is created because there is a certain amount of air above us, to be at the same "atmosphere" you need the same amount of air=same amount of cfm. same boost does NOT equal the same amount of air.
Good talk, see you out there.
and LOL that you google atmospheric pressure and then call me dumb.
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
The cfm dictates the atmosphere dumbass. So now you have one set holes getting air pushed through them harder than the other set of holes. Pretty simple to figure out which set of holes are gonna have a advantage. This is why the cfm bs that your dumbass bought into by the furd guys is not worth ****. You're to dumb to know it.
I don't give a **** about same cfm. You dumb **** gmc knew in the 1920s a larger motor required a larger blower to not boost taper. How the **** does your stupid *** think a engine is gonna perform when it makes 16psi through the mid range and 14 on the top end? Do you think that's a blower sized properly to the engine? That's how the furd guys and your dumbass wants it to perform while they compare it to a engine running 20+psi.
Well I'll tell you what. The heads is essentially gonna dictate the power no matter the ci. So then the coyote gets nut kicked again. Remember EMC? They tried that and lost in the power department. And that was full on custom mod **** to off the shelf ls stuff.
#153
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
CI doesn't matter because the mod motor doesn't have more, right?
So in which case the blower size/cfm/boost/whatever shouldn't matter, right? Or in the case if it does, then we can make a good substitution for ci and give an advantage to the mod motor? But wait, it doesn't need one, so let's not do that.
****, looks like mod motor is still faster.
What's next?
So in which case the blower size/cfm/boost/whatever shouldn't matter, right? Or in the case if it does, then we can make a good substitution for ci and give an advantage to the mod motor? But wait, it doesn't need one, so let's not do that.
****, looks like mod motor is still faster.
What's next?
#154
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yea....you just got kicked in the ****** nuts dumbass and you know. Babble some more so i can lol at you more.
![The Jester](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_jest.gif)
The cfm dictates the atmosphere dumbass. So now you have one set holes getting air pushed through them harder than the other set of holes. Pretty simple to figure out which set of holes are gonna have a advantage. This is why the cfm bs that your dumbass bought into by the furd guys is not worth ****. You're to dumb to know it.
I don't give a **** about same cfm. You dumb **** gmc knew in the 1920s a larger motor required a larger blower to not boost taper. How the **** does your stupid *** think a engine is gonna perform when it makes 16psi through the mid range and 14 on the top end? Do you think that's a blower sized properly to the engine? That's how the furd guys and your dumbass wants it to perform while they compare it to a engine running 20+psi.
#155
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
CI doesn't matter because the mod motor doesn't have more, right?
So in which case the blower size/cfm/boost/whatever shouldn't matter, right? Or in the case if it does, then we can make a good substitution for ci and give an advantage to the mod motor? But wait, it doesn't need one, so let's not do that.
****, looks like mod motor is still faster.
What's next?
So in which case the blower size/cfm/boost/whatever shouldn't matter, right? Or in the case if it does, then we can make a good substitution for ci and give an advantage to the mod motor? But wait, it doesn't need one, so let's not do that.
****, looks like mod motor is still faster.
What's next?
I never said any different. And the fact this is your only retort shows what a dumbass you are.
It still doesn't change the fact when you pressurize one hole more than another it will have a advantage vs other hole.
I really find it hard to believe anyone that can even turn on a computing device is this ******* stupid.
#157
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The engines are what they are. I didn't pick the ci and neither did you. The fact is head flow will have a great factor in determining hp. So even if you increase the ci the hp will not increase as much as YOU think it will by your comments.
I never said any different. And the fact this is your only retort shows what a dumbass you are.
It still doesn't change the fact when you pressurize one hole more than another it will have a advantage vs other hole.
I really find it hard to believe anyone that can even turn on a computing device is this ******* stupid.
I never said any different. And the fact this is your only retort shows what a dumbass you are.
It still doesn't change the fact when you pressurize one hole more than another it will have a advantage vs other hole.
I really find it hard to believe anyone that can even turn on a computing device is this ******* stupid.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
#158
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The engines are what they are. I didn't pick the ci and neither did you. The fact is head flow will have a great factor in determining hp. So even if you increase the ci the hp will not increase as much as YOU think it will by your comments.
I never said any different. And the fact this is your only retort shows what a dumbass you are.
It still doesn't change the fact when you pressurize one hole more than another it will have a advantage vs other hole.
I really find it hard to believe anyone that can even turn on a computing device is this ******* stupid.
I never said any different. And the fact this is your only retort shows what a dumbass you are.
It still doesn't change the fact when you pressurize one hole more than another it will have a advantage vs other hole.
I really find it hard to believe anyone that can even turn on a computing device is this ******* stupid.