When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
All OEM V1 rear shocks are self leveling "Nivomat" by Sachs.
The rear stacked shock spacers are to counter their self leveling effect to match up with the lowering spring.
I have the H&R springs too and made a 3/8" donut spacer out of a sheet of stiff rubber stock from McMaster Carr and some hole saws. I don't recall what the actual lift was, but it brought my tires even with the fender rather than tucked. I also used the same type of spacers under the rear coil springs.
I'm trying to find spacers for my self leveling shocks. I have eibach springs. Does anybody know where to get the spacers?
I don't have any pictures of my own and the original pictures have been held hostage by photobucket, so sadly, I'm not sure of any to point you to.
These two threads should provide some further context. http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums...-lowering.html
For the front springs I placed the spacer I cut under the stock coil spring isolator (rubber cradle at the base of the spring). You have the advantage of the shocks and spring being off the car already so you can slip the donut spacer you make over the top, then slide the stock isolator over it, then spring, cap, etc.
However, if you're using the stock springs then there's no need for this spacer. That's only if you were to keep the drop springs for their higher spring rate.
Thanks. That's all very helpful. I'm sitting here with a set of just-purchased FE4 springs and everyone, myself included, loves the current lowered look so much we're exploring alternatives. I think we're gonna try raising the current H&Rs instead of replacing them.
Do you know if lowering/spacer ratio is supposed to be 1:1 in order to stay in the correct self-leveling range for the FE2 shocks? Another words, if I lift the current springs a certain distance will I need to remove the corresponding height from the lowering spacers?
Regarding the spacer kit for the rear - that is what I did with the MM kit. It raised the shock up far more than the ~1.25" I lowered it, so I removed the tall spacers in the kit and replaced with washers. It is still probably raised more than I lowered the car, yet it seems to handle better now that the shock isn't in such an extended position.
Thanks. That's all very helpful. I'm sitting here with a set of just-purchased FE4 springs and everyone, myself included, loves the current lowered look so much we're exploring alternatives. I think we're gonna try raising the current H&Rs instead of replacing them.
Do you know if lowering/spacer ratio is supposed to be 1:1 in order to stay in the correct self-leveling range for the FE2 shocks? Another words, if I lift the current springs a certain distance will I need to remove the corresponding height from the lowering spacers?
I don't know the ratio as I was just going for approximates, but maybe someone running adjustable coilovers could speak better to that. Because of the angles, I would say that an adjustment along the spring would lead to a greater increase of ride height.
Anybody got access to a front shock for measuring the barrel diameter? I'm gonna make a spacer to put between the spring perch and the spring isolator. Or just measure a front bottom isolator would work too -- just need ID and OD.
Last edited by WoodyFromBama; Sep 11, 2017 at 03:25 PM.
Anybody got access to a front shock for measuring the barrel diameter? I'm gonna make a spacer to put between the spring perch and the spring isolator. Or just measure a front bottom isolator would work too -- just need ID and OD.
H&R will pretty much make any spring you want ,, you could just scale the rig and send the weights to H&R and tell them you want it to not bottom out, they do make progressives as well, both are not that bad of pricing as I recall. AND H&R/US is in Seattle isn't it?Used to pick up stuff form them years ago when I'd go up to run at SIR.
I thought I looked at Rock Auto (CADILLAC/2006/CTS/6.0L V8/Suspension/Strut). Re-looking after your note I found the dimensions under "shock" instead. I don't mean to be as lazy as it sometimes might seem -- just not as skilled as I need to be in constructing effective searches. But I'm working on it.
I didn't know H&R was here in Seattle (actually up near the Canadian border in Bellingham). Thanks for that tidbit. I'll contact them and see what they suggest for getting this particular installation "de-lowered" a little bit.
Last edited by WoodyFromBama; Sep 11, 2017 at 08:25 PM.
I was just looking at the following spacers at O'Reilly's. It looks like they just go under the bottom coil -- between the spring and the isolator -- but I haven't found anything that talks about actual installation. Plus they only give a dimension for the coil wire (5/8") and not the coil itself so I don't know how anyone would ever know whether it would fit their particular coil spring or not.
At any rate, the reason I'm posting this is because it included the following tidbit of info...
"front vehicle height will usually be raised 2-1/2 to 3 times spacer thickness. On rear coil spring systems the vehicle height will usually be raised 1-1/4 to 1-1/2 times spacer thickness"
So it looks like your 3/8" donut spacers should have given you about a 1" lift in front and probably around 1/2" in the rear. Is that what you got?
That's a universal statement that varies wildly in accuracy. I don't think I got anywhere near an inch out of the front spacer. Maybe 3/4" max, but probably more like 1/2 to 5/8".
I think my H&R springs may be bad - hence lowering the car 2.25" instead of the target 1.2"-1.5".
Here is a picture with the car jacked up and the wheel hub just hanging -- not supported at all. Take a look at the top 4 rings of the spring -- they might as well be a solid piece for all the spring action I'll get from them. Raising the bottom of the springs 3/8", or even 1/2" is not gonna make much difference.
Does anyone else with H&R lowering springs have a similar picture for comparison?
Can't see your wheel hub so can't tell. Check the numbers on the spring and make sure they're the right parts, and that front and rear are not swapped. Should not be lowered that much, and springs generally don't fail unless you see an obvious break.
I don't see anything wrong with the spring or install itself. The main complaint about the H&Rs (and Eibachs) was that they lowered the car more than stated. The spacing of the coils at the top is just the design of progressive springs as opposed to linear. As the spring compresses, the spring rate increases. This allows for ride comfort during light loads and cruising and also allows for firmer compression under heavy loads and cornering.
The 3/8" spacer won't bring it up an inch, but it put me where I wanted to be. So, I'll consider that a win.
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...
Spacers 
