Horsepower seems to be down.
#22
TECH Senior Member
#24
TECH Senior Member
#25
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Norman Park, GA
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know with hi ram I’m giving up down low but up top is where is should be making power and it seems every thread I’ve read about it says it out performs the ls6 and trailblazer ss intake up top. But it feels something in this combo isn’t allowing a lot of power up top?
#26
TECH Senior Member
Maybe you're right. That manifold needs more cam to put it in its ideal operating range. Is the rest of the valvetrain up for it? Or would a wilder cam put the truck outside of your comfort zone?
#27
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Norman Park, GA
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I’ve done trunion upgrade, arp rod bolt upgrade and that’s about it. It’s not a dd so wilder cam isn’t big deal to me. Just needs to be where i can still drive on streets with it.
#28
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
I know with hi ram I’m giving up down low but up top is where is should be making power and it seems every thread I’ve read about it says it out performs the ls6 and trailblazer ss intake up top. But it feels something in this combo isn’t allowing a lot of power up top?
#29
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
IMO the compression is too low for that cam. I’d knock the stick back ten degrees like a 218/226 EPS or Cam Motion truck cam
And pair that with the long runner factory intake/TBSS or even an LS6 will fully support your 400 horsepower desire.
I’m thinking you’ll gain 40-45 RWHP and turn 12.60 quarter Miles
And pair that with the long runner factory intake/TBSS or even an LS6 will fully support your 400 horsepower desire.
I’m thinking you’ll gain 40-45 RWHP and turn 12.60 quarter Miles
#30
Banned
iTrader: (1)
I just looked at the torque curve.
I think it is beautiful. I can't tell how much smoothing is in it, but it looks exactly what you want to see. That engine is running well. 2500 to 6500 is great for a truck, you can't do much better cylinder fill consistency wise.
It may have a tiny bit more power in it if you spun it higher, but I think what you are really looking for at this point is global constants. I.e. compression ratio, fuel quality, intake air temperature, exhaust or intake flow potential to raise that entire curve up a notch. I don't see the cam as a problem because torque is still very flat near redline. I don't see the head or intake as an issue because torque is still very flat near redline. If the head, intake, or cam, were a problem to overall flow, torque would taper off near redline like factory does.
Lets re-evaluate from another perspective so you can get a feel for what info is in that graph. If you notice torque stays mostly flat. that means cylinder fill is fairly consistent through all rpms. It even has that slight peak region right in the center which kinda says "yeah I am degree'd properly too and this is my 101% VE region" It means that all of the parts are working together very nice to give nice full cylinders at each RPM. We don't know how full; if they are, say, 85% full, you have room for 15% improvement in Flow. This would come from exhaust or intake flow mods normally, but in your case I wouldn't mess with anything. 1 because it runs absolutely perfect and 2 because you might already be near 95%-100% full. Compare the torque with other engines of the same size and compression and transmission to get an idea of how full the cylinders are next if you can. If you find another couple engines with the same compression ratio and trans making 50+ more torque than you are then we start looking for a global variable as a cause. It wouldn't be say, a restriction, because restrictions to overall max flow in mass/time units do not limit peak torque, they only limit peak power. A restriction to flow would therefore show up as a high peak torque and a fast taper down- which yours does NOT do. It could be say, a cam phase issue or overlap related, limiting cylinder fill. You might pick up 50+ ft*lbs of torque if you advanced that cam 5* or something silly because it is off somehow with respect to its position. tell me you degree'd it?
I think it is beautiful. I can't tell how much smoothing is in it, but it looks exactly what you want to see. That engine is running well. 2500 to 6500 is great for a truck, you can't do much better cylinder fill consistency wise.
It may have a tiny bit more power in it if you spun it higher, but I think what you are really looking for at this point is global constants. I.e. compression ratio, fuel quality, intake air temperature, exhaust or intake flow potential to raise that entire curve up a notch. I don't see the cam as a problem because torque is still very flat near redline. I don't see the head or intake as an issue because torque is still very flat near redline. If the head, intake, or cam, were a problem to overall flow, torque would taper off near redline like factory does.
Lets re-evaluate from another perspective so you can get a feel for what info is in that graph. If you notice torque stays mostly flat. that means cylinder fill is fairly consistent through all rpms. It even has that slight peak region right in the center which kinda says "yeah I am degree'd properly too and this is my 101% VE region" It means that all of the parts are working together very nice to give nice full cylinders at each RPM. We don't know how full; if they are, say, 85% full, you have room for 15% improvement in Flow. This would come from exhaust or intake flow mods normally, but in your case I wouldn't mess with anything. 1 because it runs absolutely perfect and 2 because you might already be near 95%-100% full. Compare the torque with other engines of the same size and compression and transmission to get an idea of how full the cylinders are next if you can. If you find another couple engines with the same compression ratio and trans making 50+ more torque than you are then we start looking for a global variable as a cause. It wouldn't be say, a restriction, because restrictions to overall max flow in mass/time units do not limit peak torque, they only limit peak power. A restriction to flow would therefore show up as a high peak torque and a fast taper down- which yours does NOT do. It could be say, a cam phase issue or overlap related, limiting cylinder fill. You might pick up 50+ ft*lbs of torque if you advanced that cam 5* or something silly because it is off somehow with respect to its position. tell me you degree'd it?
Last edited by kingtal0n; 03-07-2018 at 10:56 PM.
#31
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Here is an example of what a high ram vs a LS6 looked like at 525hp on a engine dyno. The nnbs will be similar to the LS6. The nnbs will be a better intake due to the tq thru the curve but it will not fix your peak numbers if anything peak will come down a lot. Just wanted to give you an example before you go to the trouble of changing intakes and your peak numbers come down even more
#33
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
Here is an example of what a high ram vs a LS6 looked like at 525hp on a engine dyno. The nnbs will be similar to the LS6. The nnbs will be a better intake due to the tq thru the curve but it will not fix your peak numbers if anything peak will come down a lot. Just wanted to give you an example before you go to the trouble of changing intakes and your peak numbers come down even more
#34
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
imo, the cam is a tad high on the exhaust duration. id say if he had stock heads it would be good, but ported 5.3s have a good exh flow so that much duration isn't really necessary unless ur spinning 7 grand. we need to find out when he wants to shift this thing to help us decide how this cam affects his desires.
also it may be time to look at the cam card and see when the valves are opening. i no comp has probably done a lot of ls testing, but id personally go with a company who spends most of there time on the ls platform. comp makes cams for everything so how do we know they sat for hours and hours making tweaks and seeing how it affects things. cammotion, tsp, btr, all companies that spend a lot of time around these motors. when i contacted cammotion about swapping out my cam, they saw a lot of improvements i could gain just buy bringing on the intake valve a little earlier compared to my current cam. food for thought, ur comp grind valve events could possibly be better. now that i think of it, ive personally never seen any builds that make super good power using a comp specd cam, then again u don't see a whole lot on here anyway
also it may be time to look at the cam card and see when the valves are opening. i no comp has probably done a lot of ls testing, but id personally go with a company who spends most of there time on the ls platform. comp makes cams for everything so how do we know they sat for hours and hours making tweaks and seeing how it affects things. cammotion, tsp, btr, all companies that spend a lot of time around these motors. when i contacted cammotion about swapping out my cam, they saw a lot of improvements i could gain just buy bringing on the intake valve a little earlier compared to my current cam. food for thought, ur comp grind valve events could possibly be better. now that i think of it, ive personally never seen any builds that make super good power using a comp specd cam, then again u don't see a whole lot on here anyway
Last edited by Floorman279; 03-08-2018 at 07:01 AM. Reason: ......
#35
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
always nice to see comparison graphs. however, thats a 525 hp motor, were only trying to get to a 400 hp motor right now. def not knocking u for putting up a graph, but the differences between a high ram and factory style intake are much less on a 400 hp build. if u have a 5.7 that makes 450 wheel with an ls6 intake, you slap an unproved fast 102 on there and u "should" pickup 18-25 depending. put a 102 on ur unmodified stock 310 rwhp 5.7, and u "should" get about 12-15. bigger motor will appreciate the fast more, just like a bigger motor will appreciate the hi ram more in this scenario. again, you do have a nice torque curve tho.
#37
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
All things considered, I think that the torque seems really low. I'd start with diagnostics first to make sure the engine is healthy before throwing parts at it. Do a leakdown test and see what info your tuner has from the tuning session. Maybe even post the tune file for others to look at for any abnormalities.
#38
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Norman Park, GA
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tuner done leak down test and found no issues with that. As far as spinning the motor, I’m really comfortable with spinning it to 6400-6600 rpms. The cylinder heads are Texas speed prc 2.5 5.3 heads with 58cc. I chose that to try and bump compression up to. In my opinion this should’ve been a 500+ motor at the flywheel but the dyno is showing it to be 450-475.
#40
Banned
iTrader: (1)
But you would be going the wrong direction if you spin the motor higher, and increase cam duration.
Right now you have a LOT of area under the curve. Torque might be low but you will find and fix the global cause. Swapping the cam for more power upstairs would ruin the area under the curve, specifically the 2500rpm cylinder fill region, in exchange for more peak power on the dyno graph, which you would barely ever see or use on the street in a heavy truck.
Right now you have a LOT of area under the curve. Torque might be low but you will find and fix the global cause. Swapping the cam for more power upstairs would ruin the area under the curve, specifically the 2500rpm cylinder fill region, in exchange for more peak power on the dyno graph, which you would barely ever see or use on the street in a heavy truck.