I have an Idea to reduce turbo lag!!!!
Has anyone tried this and what are your thoughts?
There is such a thing as variable turbine vanes that they've used on turbochargers for a while. http://www.motorage.com/motorage/dat...08/article.pdf
A vortex generator is nothing more than a small piece of metal. airplanes use everywhere to swirl air to gain stability and reduce turbulance. Now if you scaled the f-18 vortex generator down to the size of the exhaust pipe it would prolly sit about 1/8 up from the bottom of the inside of the pipe. An o'2 sensor is prolly more resrictive than this would.
Last edited by lt1fbody355; Oct 15, 2005 at 07:58 PM.
Trending Topics
Whatever its for, I can assure you that there is no such device between the combustion chamber and the turbine inlet of those engines. That would be comparable to the pre-turbo turbine area. The jet inlet would be comparable to something between the air filter and the compressor wheel.
In either case, its not something I would do.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Impeller (compressor wheel) inlet pre-swirl does work better on Axial compressors then Centrifugal. The main reason behind inlet pre-swirl is to improve low speed pressure ratio, but it does come with a hit (increased inlet losses). Also I have not looked at a FA-18 engine but can say with some certainty that IGV (inlet guide vane(s)) are adjustable. A jet plane can overcome these inlet losses because inlet is generally not static (plane is usually in motion and at a good clip). In addition axial compressor are very sensitive to inlet pressure distortion and require IGV anyway so why not make them adjustable.
If you are good with some complex math then purchase “Centrifugal Compressor Design and Performance” by David Japikse. It is very well written and dedicates a part to pre-swirl.
The big problem with centrifugal pre-swirl is low inlet mach number versus axial. As an example axial compressors typically require a Mn (mach number) of 0.6 or greater and centrifugals like turbo work in 0.15-0.25. With larger inlet numbers (Mn) guide vanes become smaller and more efficient.
Another problem is you will loose some efficiency, do to inlet blockage.
If you have more questions let me know.
Mike
Last edited by Skunkworks; Oct 15, 2005 at 10:38 PM.
I know that it is not a good idea but will it work?
I was told that they do it to jet engines to get more thrust.
As for jet engines, they can't really be directly compared to a turbo. Jet engines have a series of compressor vanes, not exactly the same as a turbo. And with a jet, the water-injection is used to cool the air in the combustion chamber. The injection of coolant into the combustion chamber inlet increases the mass flow rate through the turbine. The pressure and temperature drop across the turbine results in an increase in pressure in the jet pipe, giving additional thrust. Also, the consequent reduction in turbine inlet temperature allows the fuel system to increase the fuel flow to a valve giving an increase in rotational speed of the engine.
But water can also be sprayed into the compressor air inlet. When the water/coolant is sprayed into the compressor inlet, the temperature of the air is reduced, increasing the density of the compressor inlet air,\ and the thrust is increased.
Just a thought I am no expert and do not know if this would help or hurt.
Just a thought I am no expert and do not know if this would help or hurt.
Nitrous is used to to create more energy in the combustion chamber, which creates more exhaust in turn.
Water injection before the turbine would worsen the lag because you are cooling the exhaust expansion that is used to spin the turbine.
The only idea that I can see working to help sppol a turbo faster is to cool the exhaust directly after the turbo at a rapid rate- this would help the scavenging effect and expansion of gases pre-turbo



, BUT not easy solutions.