Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What are the cons to using high-ratio rockers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2017, 07:38 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
8.Lug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: PNW
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default What are the cons to using high-ratio rockers?

It's my understanding that the higher ratio is best for keeping the arc of the wipe pattern as straight as possible - so why not always use 1.8:1 rockers on everything? Flex in the rocker itself? Well let's assume I'm using the highest of quality shaft mount rockers - are there still cons?
Old 12-10-2017, 10:17 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
.boB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 897
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

You're effectively increasing the lift and duration of the cam. That increases the potential for piston to valve contact if you already have an aftermarket cam. And you'll increase side loading of the valve stem.

If you have a stock cam, there really isn't a down side if done correctly.
Old 12-10-2017, 02:24 PM
  #3  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,602
Received 3,687 Likes on 2,244 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Springs. The higher the ratio, the faster the valve opens, regardless of ramp rate. A faster valve opening is great for performance, IF your PTV is setup correctly, but it’s much harder on valve springs.
Old 12-11-2017, 06:49 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Really depends on your setup. If you are stock, then the new springs and likely pushrods required to make them work are questionable costwise vs. just swapping the cam. If you are running something like the GM hotcam that has a lower lift, then some have seen pretty good results with the additional lift.

Need more information on their intended use. After all, GM uses them stock in some of the later motors.
Old 12-11-2017, 07:22 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Great question. I have a rebuilt LS1 with new replacement type pistons, 243's from an LS6 with factory yellow valve springs and valves milled 15 IIRC, and the 385hp version of the LS6 cam. This was done because the parts were available and cheap. Obviously I'd rather have a "good" cam, but I don't want to get new springs etc. It's just too much money. Would a set of 1.8's be a worthwhile solution to getting a little bit more out of the motor?
Old 12-11-2017, 01:30 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
8.Lug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: PNW
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by vettenuts
Need more information on their intended use. After all, GM uses them stock in some of the later motors.
Let’s say for a higher revving solid lifter NA motor.
Old 12-11-2017, 02:16 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,971
Received 466 Likes on 365 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

I've had 1.8s on my ls6 for a long time now with no issues.

For any custom cammed motor like your speaking of i would think they are preferred as long as the grinder knows you have them.
Old 12-11-2017, 05:18 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
WOThrottle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Probably the biggest disadvantages to using a higher ratio rocker is the added force applied to the pushrod side of the valvetrain, and the higher valve lift rate. That means the pushrod, lifter, and camshaft see more force applied to them. Changing the rocker ratio does not affect the camshaft duration, only the rate of valve lift and total valve lift. With that being said, for most things that people do here none of that is a big issue if you're only going from a stock rocker to something with a 1.8 ratio.
Old 12-11-2017, 05:40 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 171 Likes on 120 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Higher ratio rockers have a small duration increase when measured at .050. Nothing wrong with them in a stock cam. You'll need better springs though
Old 12-11-2017, 05:42 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,427
Received 171 Likes on 120 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

I think lt1 rockers are 1.8 from factory
Old 12-11-2017, 07:22 PM
  #11  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by WOThrottle
Changing the rocker ratio does not affect the camshaft duration...
It definitely does, but as hammer said, it's usually not by much.
Old 12-12-2017, 07:22 AM
  #12  
Teching In
 
WOThrottle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess that my comment was misleading. I meant to say that it doesn't change seat duration.
Old 12-12-2017, 07:32 AM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
Higher ratio rockers have a small duration increase when measured at .050. Nothing wrong with them in a stock cam. You'll need better springs though
Really? Seems like a fairly small change. We're talking about a roughly 6 percent increase in lift. I'd think that factory springs could handle that, they have to have some "extra" built into them.
Old 12-12-2017, 07:39 AM
  #14  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by AnotherWs6
Really? Seems like a fairly small change. We're talking about a roughly 6 percent increase in lift. I'd think that factory springs could handle that, they have to have some "extra" built into them.
It wouldn't be a bad idea. Think of the rocker as an amplifier for the lobe. It intensifies everything, including acceleration. Compared to a stock 1.7 rocker, an aftermarket 1.8 rocker will usually carry some extra weight over the valve too. The combination of those factors could easily cause some issues.
Old 12-12-2017, 07:42 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
 
MuhThugga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington, De
Posts: 1,712
Received 273 Likes on 178 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

On a factory cam, the LS6/2/3 springs can handle the added lift.

You should do the math whenever changing rocker ratio to see if your springs will be happy:
(Lift/Old Ratio)(New Ratio)=New Lift

Also, if you plan on changing cams after switching to a 1.8, you have to take that into consideration when selecting a camshaft or else you will wind up with a very unstable valvetrain.
Old 12-12-2017, 07:46 AM
  #16  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,452
Received 1,852 Likes on 1,152 Posts

Default

Personally if I was doing a rockers only upgrade, I'd use psi1511, titanium retainers for weight savings and valve control. And 5/16 x 080 pushrods. Valvetrain stability is always a good idea
Old 12-12-2017, 09:34 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
 
gagliano7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Monroe,NY
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 91 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by AnotherWs6
Great question. I have a rebuilt LS1 with new replacement type pistons, 243's from an LS6 with factory yellow valve springs and valves milled 15 IIRC, and the 385hp version of the LS6 cam. This was done because the parts were available and cheap. Obviously I'd rather have a "good" cam, but I don't want to get new springs etc. It's just too much money. Would a set of 1.8's be a worthwhile solution to getting a little bit more out of the motor?
There are some good cams that will work with your stock springs which would be a better upgrade than rockers.

https://www.briantooleyracing.com/tr...e-iii-cam.html

https://www.briantooleyracing.com/tr...ge-iv-cam.html

Just some examples.
Old 12-12-2017, 09:58 AM
  #18  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Yeah, that's how **** snowballs. And then my sealed up motor has to come apart.....

Thoughts about the stage 3 vs factory LS6 cam?
Old 12-12-2017, 10:07 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Ebay makes me mental, so many tempting things on there.....

Last edited by KCS; 12-12-2017 at 12:57 PM. Reason: Non Sponsor Link Removed
Old 12-12-2017, 11:30 AM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
8.Lug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: PNW
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Don’t get me wrong, I LOVE ebay, every single thing on my car came from there including my L33, but $200 for aluminum rockers? This is exactly the type of thing that causes people shun eBay. Stick to name-brand stuff when it’s as important as this.


Quick Reply: What are the cons to using high-ratio rockers?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM.