Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Hpr 468 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2021, 04:52 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
BigDaddy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lawrenceburg Ky
Posts: 420
Received 289 Likes on 132 Posts
Default Hpr 468 2.0

I've got the 468 pulled and already at the machine shop. It's gonna need 1 piston which HPR is sourcing to me.
Here's what the new build is gonna look like:
1) HPR 468 gen iv aluminum shortblock). 4.185 bore x 4.250 stroke. 13.5 compression.
2) Liberty LS3/LS7 hybrid heads with 2.185 Victory titanium valves, 1209x springs, heads were ported and flowed at 425cfm by Carl Quist competition engines.
3) TSP 1.72 roller rockers.
4) Cam motion .739/.739, 262/276, 114+4 hydraulic roller.
5) Johnson 2126 lifters.
6) 3/8, .135 wall pushrods
7) CID 4.5 intake.
8) Accufab 4500 throttle body.
9) 2" long tube headers.
10) 100 pound Fast injectors.
11) Magnafuel 4303 pump.
12) Mechman alternator.
13) E85.

Transmission and stall:
1) FTI 1.80 powerglide.
2) FTI 8" 6000 Stall.

Rear:
1) Ford 8.8.
2) Spool.
3) 4.10 ratio.
4) 31 spline race axles.
5) Ladder bars and anti roll bar.


Last edited by BigDaddy97; 04-22-2024 at 07:14 PM.
The following 6 users liked this post by BigDaddy97:
BFromTheD (05-31-2024), Double06 (10-06-2021), DualQuadDave (10-07-2021), fnbadaz06 (10-07-2021), JJ_TURBO (10-07-2021), rkupon1 (10-09-2021) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 10-07-2021, 07:44 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

A set back is just that....Keep moving Forward 👍
The following 2 users liked this post by Corona:
BigDaddy97 (10-07-2021), G Atsma (10-07-2021)
Old 10-07-2021, 09:00 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
84ta406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 178
Received 103 Likes on 64 Posts

Default

At what lift was the 425cfm flowed? What do they do at .700 lift?
The following 2 users liked this post by 84ta406:
DualQuadDave (10-07-2021), G Atsma (10-07-2021)
Old 10-07-2021, 10:59 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
BigDaddy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lawrenceburg Ky
Posts: 420
Received 289 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 84ta406
At what lift was the 425cfm flowed? What do they do at .700 lift?
They flowed 425cfm on a 4.125 bore @ .750 lift. The bore on my engine is 4.185.

Last edited by BigDaddy97; 10-18-2021 at 02:26 AM.
Old 10-09-2021, 09:39 AM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
 
Fishmasterdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 309
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Can I ask why the cam seems to small?? Seems like you would want 280/290 700 plus for that??
Old 10-09-2021, 03:27 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
BigDaddy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lawrenceburg Ky
Posts: 420
Received 289 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fishmasterdan
Can I ask why the cam seems to small?? Seems like you would want 280/290 700 plus for that??
Looking at other 468 builds, Erik typically specs the cams in the 260/270 range and with 700+ lift. My goal is to have repeatable 9's without having to rev it to the moon. I think I will be fine with this set up, but If I don't get there, I will make changes.

Last edited by BigDaddy97; 05-22-2024 at 04:18 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by BigDaddy97:
Corona (10-11-2021), G Atsma (10-09-2021), NSFW (04-30-2024)
Old 10-09-2021, 06:02 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
rkupon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bayville,NJ
Posts: 2,011
Received 751 Likes on 407 Posts

Default

Man thats gunna be a handful. ; )
Old 10-09-2021, 07:35 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,890
Received 599 Likes on 475 Posts

Default

So what was the reason you burnt up the piston?
Old 10-09-2021, 08:24 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
BigDaddy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lawrenceburg Ky
Posts: 420
Received 289 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jimbo1367
So what was the reason you burnt up the piston?
Ferrea valve broke in my MMS heads.
Old 10-09-2021, 09:31 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,806
Received 592 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

Great build
I like builds with odd ball set of heads so to speak and not so common...
The following users liked this post:
BigDaddy97 (10-10-2021)
Old 10-09-2021, 09:33 PM
  #11  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
 
BigDaddy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Lawrenceburg Ky
Posts: 420
Received 289 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tuskyz28
Great build
I like builds with odd ball set of heads so to speak and not so common...
Thanks man, I think they will perform nicely.
Old 10-11-2021, 01:04 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

I hate to say this But I'll bet 5 bucks your engine is gonna like the Ls3 heads more... Why some may ask? With a engine this size it isn't CFM it's the CSA needed with CFM...

It's gonna have tq Regardless not saying a Ls3 is better than a Ls7 just it's happiness, & it's ability to Rpm with some Tq loss.
Old 10-11-2021, 01:16 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Reason I Preach what I Preach...

Every Combination has a recommendation for MCSA for a given Size and rpm peak.

A 468 going to 7k has a recommendation of what size?

MCSA is 3.00 sq. That's the Minimum so it's waning 3.1+ CSA to get a avg Minimum of 3.0 MCSA.

About the size of a stock Ls3 port. 👍

Sorry from the Reverend.about the sermon. 🙏
Old 10-11-2021, 08:47 AM
  #14  
On The Tree
 
psicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: HTown, Texas
Posts: 184
Received 66 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Corona
Reason I Preach what I Preach...

Every Combination has a recommendation for MCSA for a given Size and rpm peak.

A 468 going to 7k has a recommendation of what size?

MCSA is 3.00 sq. That's the Minimum so it's waning 3.1+ CSA to get a avg Minimum of 3.0 MCSA.

About the size of a stock Ls3 port. 👍

Sorry from the Reverend.about the sermon. 🙏
No it's not. A stock LS3 port has a mcsa that's more like 2.75in2
The following users liked this post:
Corona (10-11-2021)
Old 10-11-2021, 08:51 AM
  #15  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Avg Measured after porting? 👍
Old 10-11-2021, 08:57 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
 
psicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: HTown, Texas
Posts: 184
Received 66 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Corona
Avg Measured after porting? 👍
Depends on who ports it, but that's not a stock port anymore is it? The engine doesn't really even care about average csa anyways, does it? It's the minimum csa that matters more.
Old 10-11-2021, 09:22 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Not worried about the as cast Exact numbers. Rather the amount of CSA/MCSA wanted for a 468 @ 7k. Being this large wants a larger port...also may have gotten the Factory stuff as cast wrong.

Dennis Wheat ..
airflowdevelop wrote:My large port LS3 head is 3.24 at the intake flange, 3.58 at the short side and 3.05 at the venturi
👍

Example of a Larger port head

Old 10-11-2021, 11:06 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

I hate to be a Nag...

Darin Morgan: personal camaro ls3 heads
Port volume stock 257cc
Port volume fully ported 262cc
These heads are a little to large from the factory. I tried to remove only the material needed to increase efficiency and no more.
Port opening 3.169inē
1" in 3.147inē
2" in 3.435inē
SSR apex 3.290inē
I hate to bother either for the MCSA...may send a sticky note question.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (10-11-2021)
Old 10-11-2021, 11:21 AM
  #19  
On The Tree
 
psicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: HTown, Texas
Posts: 184
Received 66 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Corona
Not worried about the as cast Exact numbers. Rather the amount of CSA/MCSA wanted for a 468 @ 7k. Being this large wants a larger port...also may have gotten the Factory stuff as cast wrong.

Dennis Wheat ..
👍

Example of a Larger port head
Yeah, your numbers are off for an as cast factory rectangle port. This was posted months ago by a moderator...I save and bookmark good info too...



That ends up being about 2.72in2 in the throat. Usually with a 45 degree seat your throat diameter shouldn't be much more than 90% of your valve diameter, but If you hit 3.0in2, you're getting up over that 90% rule for a 2.165" valve.

The LS7 is just fundamentally a better head. Better shape, better valve location, more CSA..
The following 2 users liked this post by psicko:
Corona (10-11-2021), G Atsma (10-11-2021)
Old 10-11-2021, 12:14 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,207
Received 3,146 Likes on 2,453 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by psicko
The LS7 is just fundamentally a better head. Better shape, better valve location, more CSA..
True, just too darn fragile for its own good.
The following users liked this post:
Corona (10-11-2021)


Quick Reply: Hpr 468 2.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.