Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

Swift Spring rates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2024, 12:21 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tmcmillan5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kensington, MD.
Posts: 238
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

Default Swift Spring rates

Hi, I'm tying to get rid of some of the harshness in the rear of my 68 Chevelle convertible. I have Vari shock coilovers at all 4 corners 12" spring w 5.25" travel. 450 lbs fronts 200 lbs rear. I'm ok with the front of the car it's the rear end that I'd like to soften.

So my question is which spring rate. I'm going with Swift 12" progressive springs, my choice is either 150/400 lbs or 200/500 lbs. About a 3500 lbs car.

Any imput would be great. Thanks, Tony
Old 06-18-2024, 12:27 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
Y2K_Frenzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,208
Received 228 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

I have a 3,600’ish poud car with 200-300 inch lb progressives on the rear and I dig it. The fronts are 425/530 fwiw.
Maybe go with the softer of the two.


Last edited by Y2K_Frenzy; 06-18-2024 at 12:37 PM.
Old 06-18-2024, 12:41 PM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tmcmillan5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kensington, MD.
Posts: 238
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

So the 150/400 then ?
Old 06-18-2024, 03:18 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
Y2K_Frenzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,208
Received 228 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tmcmillan5
So the 150/400 then ?
I think so. Especially for a cruiser type car if that’s what you have.
Old 07-04-2024, 09:53 AM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tmcmillan5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kensington, MD.
Posts: 238
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Y2K thanks for the input. I went with the 150/400 Swift Springs and they solve the harshness in rear suspension. Manhole covers, small potholes and expansion joints are no longer a traumatic jaw jarring experience. Car does feel a bit bouncier in the rear so I stiffened up the damping in my single stage shocks.We will see !
The following users liked this post:
Y2K_Frenzy (07-04-2024)
Old 07-04-2024, 10:37 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
Y2K_Frenzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,208
Received 228 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tmcmillan5
Y2K thanks for the input. I went with the 150/400 Swift Springs and they solve the harshness in rear suspension. Manhole covers, small potholes and expansion joints are no longer a traumatic jaw jarring experience. Car does feel a bit bouncier in the rear so I stiffened up the damping in my single stage shocks.We will see !
I’m glad they worked out and I hope the float isn’t a deal breaker. It’s hard to build a jack of all trades, master of none but hopefully you’re close. What kind of car are you working on? My car with the progressive springs is a ‘95 Mustang (solid axle) and the progressives rates are fairly close to the OEM springs. They’re stiffer by a little and the drop was less than an inch. The shocks on that one are “only” KYB Excel G’s but they’ve been doing well at controlling things for nearly a decade now.
Old 07-04-2024, 12:52 PM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tmcmillan5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kensington, MD.
Posts: 238
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

Default


The following users liked this post:
Y2K_Frenzy (07-04-2024)
Old 07-04-2024, 06:32 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
Y2K_Frenzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,208
Received 228 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

Real cool



Quick Reply: Swift Spring rates



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.