SBCvsLS1??
A lot of this going on in here.
You guys are comparing aftermarket parts to aftermarket parts. Those aren't the same engines if all of the parts inside of them aren't stock.
Last SBC I owned practically exploded. It had 250k miles on it, but it did explode.
Kurt, i'd like to ask you a question.
Which is better, Girdle or dowled mains on the LS?
Does a Gen1 SBC have the same walking problem as the LS? Is it because it is Aluminum, if so does the Aluminum Bow Tie block have the same problem?
If you know great.
http://www.nelsonracingengines.com/v...SBTT06HIGH.wmv
.
Kurt
.
Stock block gen 1's have all the same problems in the crank area. The strength in a gen1 is the extra headbolt per cylinder. The gen 3 positives are the oilpump and the high cam location in my eyes, besides the obvious stock head performance.
Kurt
Kurt, i'd like to ask you a question.
Which is better, Girdle or dowled mains on the LS?
Does a Gen1 SBC have the same walking problem as the LS? Is it because it is Aluminum, if so does the Aluminum Bow Tie block have the same problem?
If you know great.
Oh and FWIW the SBC does sound better
I really like my LS1s but the SBC is still a great power plant.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Oh and FWIW the SBC does sound better
I really like my LS1s but the SBC is still a great power plant.
The gen 1 SBC is not king.
The LT5 is king!!!!!!
The LT5 is king!!!!!!
The standard SBC still has a lot more going for it.
The standard SBC still has a lot more going for it.
Not talking best engine here I am just talking king.
As far expensive to modify the prices weren't overly expensive they were completely ludicrous.
If the LT5 had the aftermarket and production numbers of the LSX and the gen I engines though it would still be ridiculous in price but it would definately be a powerful force in the dyno queen world.



