Pump Gas and Compression Ratios
So the short block consist of:
Scat 9000 series 3.75" stroker crank
Scat I-beam 6" rods
Probe SRS flat-top 4cc 4.040" forged pistons
9.002" deck height
Heads I'm looking at are:
AFR 195cc Eliminators, they have 75cc and 65cc chamber versions but I can order them milled to the size chamber that I decide.
Prospected cam is:
Crane 109661
Advertised Duration: 292° intake / 300° exhaust
Duration @ .050: 230° intake / 238° exhaust
Lift with 1.6 ratio rocker: .575” intake / .595” exhaust
LSA: 112
Ground on 5° advance (107° Intake centerline)
Crane list the valve timing @ .004" tappet list as 35°-77°-83°-37°
Seat valve timing is calculated (with Pat Kelly calculator) @ 39°-73°-87°-33° 72° Overlap
With a .038" x 4.130" Gasket (.040 quench), 70cc chamber I get 10.5:1 Static compression and 7.8:1 dynamic. Too much? Too little?
Same gasket, 68cc chamber would be 10.7:1 and 8:1. ehh?
I know than when it comes to getting the most out of pump gas, there is alot more too it than just compression ratios, other things have to work in your favor. The intake is an Accel MPFI Pro-Ram with 36lb injectors and a 1,200cfm throttle body, so being EFI also helps because its more effecient than say a carb. Temps are an issue too. I'll be using a nice alum rad and twin puller efans, I have a cowl hood and want to fab up a sheet metal air pan. As for ignition I have an MSD 6AL, blaster coil, pro-billet distributor, and 8.5mm wires. Also will have Jet-Hot coat my 1 3/4" primaries, 3" collector shorty headers. (shorties because its a V8 S-10 swap with a manual tranny, tight fit)
So yeah, long post. What are you guys opinions? I think I'm on the right track, just don't know where to go. Everywhere else I post I get replies like "I run 93 octane in my 12:1 305 with iron heads." And I'm like ok, but that doen't help me at all.
You mean dynamic?
The 383 I built for my daily driver truck is running 10.4:1 static and 8.3:1 dynamic compression.......and this is with IRON vortec heads. I run 91 octane and 34* total timing without a hint of detonation, even in 110* ambient temps. The block is zero decked and I run a .038" quench height. With the AFR 195's you can easily run up to 8.5ish dynamic compression with a tight quench height on 91 pump gas without any worries. Leaving it at 8.1 dcr might even allow 89 octane, though you'll be leaving some tq on the table.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Last edited by jmm98LS1; Oct 19, 2007 at 04:50 PM.
Its hard because, like every gearhead, I want good performance, but I'm concerned about running on the ragged edge of detonation.
I'll check into going with a tighter LSA though.
A few people tell me that .5:1 or so compression is so small that I wouldn't even notice it, therefore it would be just wiser to play it safe. What do you guys think?
Its hard because, like every gearhead, I want good performance, but I'm concerned about running on the ragged edge of detonation.
I'll check into going with a tighter LSA though.
A few people tell me that .5:1 or so compression is so small that I wouldn't even notice it, therefore it would be just wiser to play it safe. What do you guys think?
Basically what he recommends for the cubes and intake valve diameter I have would be an 106 LCA and 60 to 75ish overlap. Which (using his formula: Overlap/2+LCAx2) would equal about 272 to 287ish advertised intake duration.
Would a 106, or any thing tighter than 110 for that matter would create enough vacuum? How much vacuum would I need?
All the cam recommendations I have gotten so far (Crane, COMP, Ultradyne, ect.) are 112 or 113 LSA and are 280 or 292 advertised intake duration.
Also in his book he recommends a DCR around 8.5:1 for an cool running engine to run 90-92 octane, a little less if you run hotter. I think 8 to 8.2:1 should be safe for me.







