Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

ZR1 vs CarreraGT and Another ZR1 doing 80-200+mph Crazy...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2010, 11:37 AM
  #61  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
obZidian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

under 10 seconds? You sure?
Old 03-18-2010, 11:39 AM
  #62  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
got-a-ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jomo
The Vyron does 0-150mph in under 10secs.
0-60mph in 2.5secs.
It does the 1/4 mile low 10's at 140+mph.

But that's a car you probably wont run into.
lol... really?

0-150 in under 10 seconds while it runs a low 10 1/4 mile at 140+ ? wow now that makes sense.
Old 03-18-2010, 01:53 PM
  #63  
Teching In
 
1992TsiAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jomo
The Vyron does 0-150mph in under 10secs.
0-60mph in 2.5secs.
It does the 1/4 mile low 10's at 140+mph.

But that's a car you probably wont run into.
Tell us more, Mr. Man!
Old 03-18-2010, 02:58 PM
  #64  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jomo
The Vyron does 0-150mph in under 10secs.
0-60mph in 2.5secs.
It does the 1/4 mile low 10's at 140+mph.

But that's a car you probably wont run into.
Look the editor of Motor Trend has joined us.
Old 03-18-2010, 03:24 PM
  #65  
Staging Lane
 
Fadi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by obZidian
ok.

But what you are failing to see is that the CGT with 615hp is beating a 505hp vette by a car. A Z06 is really a 129-130mph car and a ZR1 is about 133-134mph. Think about it.
IMO, a CGT with an equally skilled driver as a Z06 would run away from the Z06. A Z06 is far from a 130 mph car. It might go high 120's or touch 130 with a perfect driver, in perfect conditions, in a negative DA, at the fastest track in the country, in perfect everything else. Typically, a bone stock Z06 is a 125 mph car, while the ZR1 is a 130 mph car. This is not the best they can do, but on average, this is where they are.

A ZR1 and a CGT is a close race, very close race, and if I had to bet giving the edge to one or the other, I would give it to the ZR1. JMO
Old 03-18-2010, 03:25 PM
  #66  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
chasgiv3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jomo
The Vyron does 0-150mph in under 10secs.
0-60mph in 2.5secs.
It does the 1/4 mile low 10's at 140+mph.

But that's a car you probably wont run into.
Whatever pill you're popping please cut it in half...it's affecting you in a very negative way!
Old 03-18-2010, 04:56 PM
  #67  
Staging Lane
 
Deuuuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by obZidian
But what you are failing to see is that the CGT with 615hp is beating a 505hp vette by a car. A Z06 is really a 129-130mph car and a ZR1 is about 133-134mph. Think about it.

Also, who cares about powershifts.... EVERY FAST RUN done in a vette either its a positive DA day or not (local Z06 went 129mph stock in positive DA) was done with a lift-shift.... AKA no powershifting. Ranger, Jaimer Furman, Dr.doc, etc, etc, etc..... ALL of those guys don't powershift.

The CGT is a great car and is a tad faster than a z06... but you said that it would beat the ZR1 same drivers and I'm arguing the fact that: NO, it won't. An intake/tune Z06 would embarrass a CGT by holding its own well with 100hp less.
Your beliefs are based on those videos, which are meaningless when it comes to comparing a ZR1 to a CGT with equal drivers.

None of those guys you mentioned do a full-lift shift and besides negative DA, powershifting is the only way they are getting trap speeds 4-5mph higher than any magazine time.

Too bad there are not enough CGTs being drag raced to get better samples. I will say this: IF the CGT isn't capable of 1.7 60fts, the ZR1 will win by ET but will trap lower and definitely lose from a roll.

Imagine if Ranger or Furman drove a CGT? It would be a 10sec 136mph+ car. What applies to the ZR1 also applies to the CGT...

The BEST Z-06 bolt-on times show a CGT with an equal driver will beat it every time as well:

1---10.198 @134.67--1.40---Gary2004Z06-------'08-----Details (full slicks/skinnys and 4:10 gear)
2---10.630 @131.35--1.55---Sébast19X -------'08-----Details
3---10.764 @129.77--1.56---07WhiteDevilZ------'07 -----Details
4---10.821 @126.16--1.61---m3corvette-------'06. -------Details
5---10.840 @128.30--1.59---TNTZ06------'07-----Details ******** Top 10 avg: 10.787 @ 129.39
6---10.851 @128.68--1.68---KILLER06GT-----'08-----Details
7---10.866 @130.10--1.68---Smokinu-------'06 -------Details
8---10.877 @127.97--1.62---DriverMod44-----'09-----Details
9---10.938 @129.42--1.72---FrenchyZ06-----'07-----Details
10--10.948 @128.65--1.70---Joe11204-----'09-----Details
**************************************** *****************
11--10.999 @127.74--1.71---LPFSTheFett------'07 -------Details
12--11.027 @125.66--1.74---walterm32 -----'08Details
13--11.083 @126.38--1.73---KLLRVET-----'06. -------Details
14--11.109 @129.34--1.78---GotGrunt'06 -----Details
15--11.126 @129.66--1.84---Slow Poke-----'07 -------Details*****Top 20 avg 10.958@ 128.48
16--11.139 @129.35--1.78---RWTD-----'08 .......Details
17--11.151 @126.61--1.79---427silverhotrod-----'08 ------Details
18--11.191 @124.86--1.78---BIGGGIE-----'07 -----Details
19--11.234 @132.88--1.83---Jorday-----'07 -------Details
20--11.249 @123.24--1.73---Jeenis-------'07 ------Details

Stock ZR1 dragtimes

4) 10.730*#+ 132.460 7.003 103.940 1.720 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 2009 Ranger drag radials
5) 10.740*#+ 133.210 7.032 104.620 1.735 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 2009 blownlt1&c6z bone stock/stock rubber
7) 10.794*#+ 132.210 7.080 102.350 1.797 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 2009 Jamie Furman
8) 10.851*#+ 129.890 7.065 102.010 1.708 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 2009 racerns (Neil)
10) 11.054*#+ 129.050 7.214 99.970 1.758 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 2009 ZO6Jeff
Old 03-18-2010, 07:17 PM
  #68  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
obZidian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fadi
IMO, a CGT with an equally skilled driver as a Z06 would run away from the Z06. A Z06 is far from a 130 mph car. It might go high 120's or touch 130 with a perfect driver, in perfect conditions, in a negative DA, at the fastest track in the country, in perfect everything else. Typically, a bone stock Z06 is a 125 mph car, while the ZR1 is a 130 mph car. This is not the best they can do, but on average, this is where they are.

A ZR1 and a CGT is a close race, very close race, and if I had to bet giving the edge to one or the other, I would give it to the ZR1. JMO
I agree that CGT would beat a Z06... but not run away. Furthermore, A z06 runs on a roll like a 129mph car, not a 125mph car. What I mean about this is very simple, look at those times posted by the search-machine deuuuce. If you just saw those numbers than you can say, yeah, a Z06 is a 125mph car. However, notice the list with non factory tires..... such as a DR. The car, all of a sudden, jumps up to the 129mph range. The reason for this is that the stock GY's are really that bad and very inconsistent at the strip. Where as when you race with a decent tire, such as a DR, the car becomes more consistent. I would also like to add, for example a HKSGTR runs in the 128-129mph range. My Z06 and others, in stock trim, has repeatedly run door to door, if not a slight move for me when I shift into 4th. (124-125mph) Also, 06 viper that ran a 126mph I beat by 3 1/2 cars, Evo's with 550awhp that hit mid 120's, 600rwhp GTO's, 650rwhp CTS-V in the 128mph... all of those cars I have either been dead even with or pulled a tad in 4th.

For example, lets talk about the GTR. With launch control, they normally run in the low 120's... without, 117-118mph. Granted they don't take the jump on you and you got your A-game when shifting, that car doesn't run like a 122mph car on the street from a roll. We should look more into track times in order to now how a car runs on the street.

So, a CGT should beat a stock z06, it has more power and the weight is decent, but not run away from it unless they go over 160mph where the Z06 shifts into 5th.

Originally Posted by Deuuuce
Your beliefs are based on those videos, which are meaningless when it comes to comparing a ZR1 to a CGT with equal drivers.

None of those guys you mentioned do a full-lift shift and besides negative DA, powershifting is the only way they are getting trap speeds 4-5mph higher than any magazine time.

Too bad there are not enough CGTs being drag raced to get better samples. I will say this: IF the CGT isn't capable of 1.7 60fts, the ZR1 will win by ET but will trap lower and definitely lose from a roll.

Imagine if Ranger or Furman drove a CGT? It would be a 10sec 136mph+ car. What applies to the ZR1 also applies to the CGT...
It is meaningful... but you fail to see it.... that's fine. Think about it some more, you'll get it.

YES, they ALL DO A FULL LIFT SHIFT. PM them all if you wish, but they all lift between shifts, just as i do. Shifting fast doesn't require a powershift.

Now you are believing magazine journalist, who need a cars like the GTR and the new 911tt to make them look good. Like I said, you believe what you want, but the truth is that you are underestimating, even though you say you are not.

They (we) don't need negative DA, powershifts, etc.... just a practiced launch and good shifts down the quarter. Like I said, recently, a local stock Z06 with a good tire went 129mph in SOUTH FLORIDA no powershifts, no tricks. Believe it.
Old 03-18-2010, 08:05 PM
  #69  
Teching In
 
jomo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by got-a-ls1
lol... really?

0-150 in under 10 seconds while it runs a low 10 1/4 mile at 140+ ? wow now that makes sense.





Basic stats
Layout & Body style Mid-engine, four-wheel drive two-door coupé/Targa top Base price €1,223,679 (£1,063,826/$1,700,000)
Internal combustion engine 8.0 litre W16, 64v DOHC quad-turbocharged petrol engine Engine displacement
& max. power 7,993 cc (487.8 cu in)
1,001 metric horsepower (736 kW; 987 bhp)
Performance
Top speed 408.5 km/h (253.8 mph) (average) 0–100 km/h (0.0–62.1 mph) 2.5 seconds[21]
0–160 km/h (0.0–99.4 mph) 5.5 seconds 0–240 km/h (0.0–149.1 mph) 9.8 seconds
0–300 km/h (0.0–186.4 mph)[22] 16.7 seconds 0–400 km/h (0.0–248.5 mph)[23][24] 50 seconds
Standing quarter-mile (402 m)[24] 10.2 seconds at 230 km/h (142.9 mph)
Fuel economy[25]
EPA city driving 8 miles per US gallon (29 L/100 km; 9.6 mpg-imp) EPA highway driving 13 miles per US gallon (18 L/100 km; 16 mpg-imp)
Top speed fuel economy 3 miles per US gallon (78 L/100 km; 3.6 mpg-imp) 1.4 US gallons per minute

Don't get on me just puting the stats out and yes it does not make sense.
Old 03-18-2010, 09:22 PM
  #70  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
chasgiv3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You posted two stats which opposed each other. Clearly that means you didn't give it any thought. If that's how you're going to post here then expect to get your *** kicked. Don't be a **** for brains and we won't treat you like one.
Old 03-18-2010, 10:19 PM
  #71  
Teching In
 
1992TsiAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jomo
Basic stats
Layout & Body style Mid-engine, four-wheel drive two-door coupé/Targa top Base price €1,223,679 (£1,063,826/$1,700,000)
Internal combustion engine 8.0 litre W16, 64v DOHC quad-turbocharged petrol engine Engine displacement
& max. power 7,993 cc (487.8 cu in)
1,001 metric horsepower (736 kW; 987 bhp)
Performance
Top speed 408.5 km/h (253.8 mph) (average) 0–100 km/h (0.0–62.1 mph) 2.5 seconds[21]
0–160 km/h (0.0–99.4 mph) 5.5 seconds 0–240 km/h (0.0–149.1 mph) 9.8 seconds
0–300 km/h (0.0–186.4 mph)[22] 16.7 seconds 0–400 km/h (0.0–248.5 mph)[23][24] 50 seconds
Standing quarter-mile (402 m)[24] 10.2 seconds at 230 km/h (142.9 mph)
Fuel economy[25]
EPA city driving 8 miles per US gallon (29 L/100 km; 9.6 mpg-imp) EPA highway driving 13 miles per US gallon (18 L/100 km; 16 mpg-imp)
Top speed fuel economy 3 miles per US gallon (78 L/100 km; 3.6 mpg-imp) 1.4 US gallons per minute

Don't get on me just puting the stats out and yes it does not make sense.
Wow, I've NEVER heard of this Bugatti!!!

Tell us more!










Old 03-18-2010, 10:55 PM
  #72  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
obZidian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jomo
Basic stats
Layout & Body style Mid-engine, four-wheel drive two-door coupé/Targa top Base price €1,223,679 (£1,063,826/$1,700,000)
Internal combustion engine 8.0 litre W16, 64v DOHC quad-turbocharged petrol engine Engine displacement
& max. power 7,993 cc (487.8 cu in)
1,001 metric horsepower (736 kW; 987 bhp)
Performance
Top speed 408.5 km/h (253.8 mph) (average) 0–100 km/h (0.0–62.1 mph) 2.5 seconds[21]
0–160 km/h (0.0–99.4 mph) 5.5 seconds 0–240 km/h (0.0–149.1 mph) 9.8 seconds
0–300 km/h (0.0–186.4 mph)[22] 16.7 seconds 0–400 km/h (0.0–248.5 mph)[23][24] 50 seconds
Standing quarter-mile (402 m)[24] 10.2 seconds at 230 km/h (142.9 mph)
Fuel economy[25]
EPA city driving 8 miles per US gallon (29 L/100 km; 9.6 mpg-imp) EPA highway driving 13 miles per US gallon (18 L/100 km; 16 mpg-imp)
Top speed fuel economy 3 miles per US gallon (78 L/100 km; 3.6 mpg-imp) 1.4 US gallons per minute

Don't get on me just puting the stats out and yes it does not make sense.
Now that makes no sense what so ever. Did you copy and paste directly? If so, find another source, that one is a caca!
Old 03-18-2010, 11:48 PM
  #73  
10 Second Club
 
Newskool Mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Royal Palm Beach FL.
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I hate to throw a Ford into this mix, cause I do love the ZR1 but how about this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpX8p...atch-main-area
Old 03-19-2010, 10:24 AM
  #74  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
obZidian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

DUDE?! Really?

That is a C6 with 1000hp and a FGT with 1500hp... um, that is a 500hp difference, even if both have 4 digit hp numbers. But what do you mean with "what about this?"


...buahahahahahaha!!!
Old 03-19-2010, 03:11 PM
  #75  
10 Second Club
 
Newskool Mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Royal Palm Beach FL.
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by obZidian
DUDE?! Really?

That is a C6 with 1000hp and a FGT with 1500hp... um, that is a 500hp difference, even if both have 4 digit hp numbers. But what do you mean with "what about this?"


...buahahahahahaha!!!
Actually thought it was cool and funny at the same time...
Old 03-19-2010, 07:05 PM
  #76  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Darksol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On a car lot, shopping...
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Normally if I saw someone beat like that, I would wonder if he knew it was a race. You embarrassed that car. Those vids gave me a hard on!
Old 03-19-2010, 07:54 PM
  #77  
Staging Lane
 
VF1Skullangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oceanside California
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Newskool Mach
I hate to throw a Ford into this mix, cause I do love the ZR1 but how about this.
Seriously?

We might as well do a 1000hp Supra up against a stock ZR1.
Old 03-19-2010, 09:13 PM
  #78  
Staging Lane
 
Deuuuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by obZidian
I agree that CGT would beat a Z06... but not run away. Furthermore, A z06 runs on a roll like a 129mph car, not a 125mph car. What I mean about this is very simple, look at those times posted by the search-machine deuuuce. If you just saw those numbers than you can say, yeah, a Z06 is a 125mph car. However, notice the list with non factory tires..... such as a DR. The car, all of a sudden, jumps up to the 129mph range. The reason for this is that the stock GY's are really that bad and very inconsistent at the strip. Where as when you race with a decent tire, such as a DR, the car becomes more consistent. I would also like to add, for example a HKSGTR runs in the 128-129mph range. My Z06 and others, in stock trim, has repeatedly run door to door, if not a slight move for me when I shift into 4th. (124-125mph) Also, 06 viper that ran a 126mph I beat by 3 1/2 cars, Evo's with 550awhp that hit mid 120's, 600rwhp GTO's, 650rwhp CTS-V in the 128mph... all of those cars I have either been dead even with or pulled a tad in 4th.

For example, lets talk about the GTR. With launch control, they normally run in the low 120's... without, 117-118mph. Granted they don't take the jump on you and you got your A-game when shifting, that car doesn't run like a 122mph car on the street from a roll. We should look more into track times in order to now how a car runs on the street.

So, a CGT should beat a stock z06, it has more power and the weight is decent, but not run away from it unless they go over 160mph where the Z06 shifts into 5th.



It is meaningful... but you fail to see it.... that's fine. Think about it some more, you'll get it.

YES, they ALL DO A FULL LIFT SHIFT. PM them all if you wish, but they all lift between shifts, just as i do. Shifting fast doesn't require a powershift.

Now you are believing magazine journalist, who need a cars like the GTR and the new 911tt to make them look good. Like I said, you believe what you want, but the truth is that you are underestimating, even though you say you are not.

They (we) don't need negative DA, powershifts, etc.... just a practiced launch and good shifts down the quarter. Like I said, recently, a local stock Z06 with a good tire went 129mph in SOUTH FLORIDA no powershifts, no tricks. Believe it.
I see your point about the powershifts. You're muddying the waters regarding DRs. Yes, it's for consistency and also less spin during the shifts for a seemingly higher trap speed.

I'm also guessing you're basing your own results on roll-ons that exceed the trap speeds of 1/4 mile results not to mention gearing, etc. There is no magical aspect to either the Z-06 nor the ZR1.

Until you have a baseline, the videos you supplied don't prove anything.

We can agree to disagree, but put those excellent drivers in a CGT, and say goodbye CZ6 and the ZR1 will lose too.
Old 03-20-2010, 08:52 AM
  #79  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

ZR1 dips but,..not surprised of the outcome.

Note: just heard a CGT out at the mile last weekend,...best sounding porsche ever. Think it went 170's in the mile...
Old 03-20-2010, 04:17 PM
  #80  
Staging Lane
 
Deuuuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by V-seriesTech
ZR1 dips but,..not surprised of the outcome.

Note: just heard a CGT out at the mile last weekend,...best sounding porsche ever. Think it went 170's in the mile...
Check out my article, first in the series "The Best Exhaust Sounds".

Global Motorsports Group who are Porsche racing specialists did an exhaust for the CGT. It's AMAZING.

http://www.examiner.com/x-5826-San-J...Exhaust-Sounds


Quick Reply: ZR1 vs CarreraGT and Another ZR1 doing 80-200+mph Crazy...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 AM.