Mustang 1 Camaro 0
06-09-2010, 07:43 AM
#121
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not trying to discredit your car by any means man but I can take just about any stock car, add 100 shot to it and outrun your stock mustang. The point is you should outrun a stock f-body with the said mods. I am just not impressed by it. My car is almost 10 years old and runs 10's on a full weight (3600lbs) stock bottom end LS1. I was impressed by that. My buddies 93 notch back with a stroker motor went low 10's at over 132mph on the motor. I was impressed by that. I am impressed by how well the new Mustangs run stock. But not impressed with any car that sprays and outruns another stock car!!
06-09-2010, 09:03 AM
#124
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-09-2010, 09:17 AM
#125
Because thats what you quoted me for.
Other than that, you have posted nothing but bullshit and smart *** remarks since you have been here.
Plus all three of the things you think are "silly" are pretty much true. Except for the queen mustang thing...they might have one though?
Anyways whats silly is for your first post to be about a intake carbed (then say that hurts performance) 100 shot 5.0 on drag wheels with drag radials and skinnies running a 12.5 to beat a stock ls1 that ran a 14.0 like its some sort of feat.
06-09-2010, 09:29 AM
#126
Where did I say "silliness removed"
Because thats what you quoted me for.
Other than that, you have posted nothing but bullshit and smart *** remarks since you have been here.
Plus all three of the things you think are "silly" are pretty much true. Except for the queen mustang thing...they might have one though?
Anyways whats silly is for your first post to be about a intake carbed (then say that hurts performance) 100 shot 5.0 on drag wheels with drag radials and skinnies running a 12.5 to beat a stock ls1 that ran a 14.0 like its some sort of feat.
Because thats what you quoted me for.
Other than that, you have posted nothing but bullshit and smart *** remarks since you have been here.
Plus all three of the things you think are "silly" are pretty much true. Except for the queen mustang thing...they might have one though?
Anyways whats silly is for your first post to be about a intake carbed (then say that hurts performance) 100 shot 5.0 on drag wheels with drag radials and skinnies running a 12.5 to beat a stock ls1 that ran a 14.0 like its some sort of feat.
Ke^in, where is that Gilbert illustration??
06-09-2010, 09:49 AM
#130
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And your point is. I told you I was on here before and forgot my ole email and screen name. But if I posted the camaro spraying a stock 5.0 it would be a different story. The responses would be "what did you expect" or mustangs are slow". And soon will be mustang 2 camaro 0.
06-09-2010, 09:58 AM
#131
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
No need to get all bent out of shape about it, at least it wasn't just a **** disturber thread like something Ju1ce would make.
OP, in the future I'd just put the two cars that raced in the title, i.e. 85 Mustang vs. 02 (or whatever year it was) Camaro SS...but then again it's your kill, post the title however the hell you want!
OP, in the future I'd just put the two cars that raced in the title, i.e. 85 Mustang vs. 02 (or whatever year it was) Camaro SS...but then again it's your kill, post the title however the hell you want!
06-09-2010, 09:59 AM
#132
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No need to get all bent out of shape about it, at least it wasn't just a **** disturber thread like something Ju1ce would make.
OP, in the future I'd just put the two cars that raced in the title, i.e. 85 Mustang vs. 02 (or whatever year it was) Camaro SS...but then again it's your kill, post the title however the hell you want!
OP, in the future I'd just put the two cars that raced in the title, i.e. 85 Mustang vs. 02 (or whatever year it was) Camaro SS...but then again it's your kill, post the title however the hell you want!
06-09-2010, 10:46 AM
#138
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW this comment
So it's not legit to gain HP by spray, but it is legit to gain HP by adding a bigger engine?
Both are power makers. Why does it matter how it's made?
Is the ZR1 times suddenly not impressive because it uses a blower?
But not impressed with any car that sprays and outruns another stock car!!
Both are power makers. Why does it matter how it's made?
Is the ZR1 times suddenly not impressive because it uses a blower?