Thursday night **Racing Videos**
07-23-2010, 01:10 AM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thursday night **Racing Videos** Supercharged SS vs LS3 c6:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1eP2o_ELf4
Rx7 w/ LS1 head/cam swap vs Supercharged SS fbody (Mr2.2 liter):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIKXd7QteGY
Supercharged SS vs LS3 vs Rx7 w/ LS1 swap:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugQGyYN-XpA
The Dodge Colt vs RX7 with the LS1 head/cam swap:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjI_3bM1r3c
Colt weighs like 2500lbs now I think with 390whp. Looks like they were back and forth the whole way up.
The RX7 weighs 2800lbs but should be at least 450rwhp.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1eP2o_ELf4
Rx7 w/ LS1 head/cam swap vs Supercharged SS fbody (Mr2.2 liter):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIKXd7QteGY
Supercharged SS vs LS3 vs Rx7 w/ LS1 swap:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugQGyYN-XpA
The Dodge Colt vs RX7 with the LS1 head/cam swap:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjI_3bM1r3c
Colt weighs like 2500lbs now I think with 390whp. Looks like they were back and forth the whole way up.
The RX7 weighs 2800lbs but should be at least 450rwhp.
Last edited by InsomZ; 07-24-2010 at 01:27 AM.
07-23-2010, 01:48 AM
#4
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Power to weight. The RX7 is probably 450rwhp and 2800 lbs.
I don't think the SS is slow.. my car probably weighs 300 lbs less with a passenger and makes the same power. The other two cars were way lighter.
I would of done better vs the RX7 without my 210 lb passenger.
I don't think the SS is slow.. my car probably weighs 300 lbs less with a passenger and makes the same power. The other two cars were way lighter.
I would of done better vs the RX7 without my 210 lb passenger.
Trending Topics
07-23-2010, 03:14 PM
#12
Staging Lane
damn nice races. That Colt always cracks me up! Though I dont buy his hp claim! IMO I would imagine he would have to at least match the RX7- yeah its lighter, but it's also FWD and Turbo- the better useability and wide torque of the V8 should make up the difference.
07-23-2010, 09:57 PM
#13
actually some colts are awd. kinda like the evo's older brother. awd eclipse, gsx, in a lighter body. so therefore, his power claims are about right. i used to want to do a colt with a 4g63 setup, but never got around to doing that
07-24-2010, 12:16 AM
#16
Teching In
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WVQf9skTXA here is the crappy iphone vid of the slow kids....45-130 roll the 2010 SS had a car load and a full tank dont get me wrong he is slow but normally not that slow lol
Last edited by sleeperstang16; 07-24-2010 at 12:22 AM.
07-24-2010, 12:37 AM
#17
Teching In
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-24-2010, 04:18 PM
#18
TECH Resident
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
seeing that supercharged ss lose to baby cam vette with boltons makes me wanna cry...i plan on being procharged in a few months 
. what kind of blower cam?
edit: didn't see you listed a cam so im assuming you just boosted a stock engine with stock 241's with a 10.1 cr im assuming?? make me happy
. what kind of blower cam?edit: didn't see you listed a cam so im assuming you just boosted a stock engine with stock 241's with a 10.1 cr im assuming?? make me happy
