LT1 vs. 2v Mustang GT
#1
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
95 auto-(stock 3.23 gears, gutted cat, tranny cooler)
2v Mustang GT-auto, vert (bone stock)
...both cars had passenger
There were 2 more races, but with no vids and no passengers but they turned out the same. I know the weight of a vert comes into play, but I thought it would be closer than that.
2v Mustang GT-auto, vert (bone stock)
...both cars had passenger
There were 2 more races, but with no vids and no passengers but they turned out the same. I know the weight of a vert comes into play, but I thought it would be closer than that.
#5
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
He figured it would be closer because generally 99-04 GTs and LT1 F-bodies are usually pretty close. BUT, that only applies to GT 5spds and Mustang automatics sucked big ***** till '05, so I'm not really surprised at all. I think the record for a stock GT automatic coupe is 14.2. Good runs.