6.0 GTO vs. Mach 1 vs. Eaton swap GT
12-14-2010, 05:21 PM
#41
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was there, The GTO was armed with a wet shot plate. The Nitrous was not working and only fuel worked. Which means it made less than 430rwhp that night. Later that night we found that the Nitrous solenoid wire was not connected. The GTO fix the spray and raced the GT with termi engine. GTO with 3 people in car plus spray VS Termi GT, the GTO won by 2 1/2. Later that night the mach1 with 298rwhp had trans problems and had to be towed
Pretty sure the gto stoped spaying after the first 2 failed attempts if not wow is all i have to say... The mach had a seal blow trans got hot problem is fixed nothing major... gt spun all over the road gto got out 2 cars and locked him down on the roll race so
... ps: who sprays a 298whp car anways 
12-14-2010, 06:54 PM
#47
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I decided to sign up and clear this up. GTO driver drove the car just fine. He spun the first run and was a little late on the hit so I got out and stayed out. The 2nd run was also from a dig he launched good with a even hit and it was basically a dead even race to 120.. Last run was a roll 45-125 and i edged him out by half a car. The GTO made 430/390 and has drag bags. I am not going to bench race but my car has already traped 112 2nd pass in the car and i am confident as it sits it has 113 in it so take that in account to the 160lb gto passanger and theres your race
12-14-2010, 07:28 PM
#48
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-14-2010, 07:32 PM
#49
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
at your gtp statement..
12-14-2010, 07:51 PM
#50
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-14-2010, 07:54 PM
#51
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-14-2010, 08:12 PM
#54
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My point is. Your car is only about 30 rwhp better than stock, with like 50 lbs of weight reduction. There's no way you're trapping 10 mph faster than what you would be, stock. Again, where's your time slips??
12-14-2010, 08:16 PM
#55
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-14-2010, 08:28 PM
#59
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: pembroke pines
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-14-2010, 08:29 PM
#60
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts