6.0 GTO vs. Mach 1 vs. Eaton swap GT
#101
TECH Enthusiast
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i'm with you guys on this. a termi swapped, 450rwhp GT is going to be quite faster than a pure termi at the same power level. it isnt adding up. also the stang has 325 DR's. he isnt gonna spin much at all.
Lift
.........Intake Flow Exhaust Flow
.200" .. 147 cfm........111 cfm
.300" ... 206cfm...... 145 cfm
.400"... 254 cfm..... 185 cfm
.500"... 291 cfm..... 204 cfm
.600"... 312 cfm.......223 cfm
just sayin. the prc 5.3 220cc numbers aint bad.
The GTO should have put busses on the mach. the GT should have put busses on the GTO. cam only LS1 should beat the GTO.
$.02
Lift
.........Intake Flow Exhaust Flow
.200" .. 147 cfm........111 cfm
.300" ... 206cfm...... 145 cfm
.400"... 254 cfm..... 185 cfm
.500"... 291 cfm..... 204 cfm
.600"... 312 cfm.......223 cfm
just sayin. the prc 5.3 220cc numbers aint bad.
The GTO should have put busses on the mach. the GT should have put busses on the GTO. cam only LS1 should beat the GTO.
$.02
#102
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lol and my times have nothing to with this thread at all, OR voicing my own ******* opinion. So take a hike.
#105
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i'm with you guys on this. a termi swapped, 450rwhp GT is going to be quite faster than a pure termi at the same power level. it isnt adding up. also the stang has 325 DR's. he isnt gonna spin much at all.
Lift
.........Intake Flow Exhaust Flow
.200" .. 147 cfm........111 cfm
.300" ... 206cfm...... 145 cfm
.400"... 254 cfm..... 185 cfm
.500"... 291 cfm..... 204 cfm
.600"... 312 cfm.......223 cfm
just sayin. the prc 5.3 220cc numbers aint bad.
The GTO should have put busses on the mach. the GT should have put busses on the GTO. cam only LS1 should beat the GTO.
$.02
Lift
.........Intake Flow Exhaust Flow
.200" .. 147 cfm........111 cfm
.300" ... 206cfm...... 145 cfm
.400"... 254 cfm..... 185 cfm
.500"... 291 cfm..... 204 cfm
.600"... 312 cfm.......223 cfm
just sayin. the prc 5.3 220cc numbers aint bad.
The GTO should have put busses on the mach. the GT should have put busses on the GTO. cam only LS1 should beat the GTO.
$.02
#107
#108
TECH Enthusiast
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yes busses. ive been watching your cars race for years. seen countless runs. raced plenty of them and lost/beat plenty.
i havent really look at your slip, but i will now....
most manual machs with your very typical mods and full interior run 8.2 here. we do have altitude on you, so 8.0 seems possible with a manual car. stalled autos give up .2 to a well set up m5 here.
a GTO with those mods tires and equal hook will run 7.9's easy and a few mph more than you.
3400lb race weight is low for a stock mach1. if you mean with you in the car. that would be 3200lb without you if you are average 200lbs. you have some weight reductions. imo.
what is not adding up, is the 85-112mph. no way you have a sudden boost of power to get to 112 from 85 in the 1/8th.
i havent really look at your slip, but i will now....
most manual machs with your very typical mods and full interior run 8.2 here. we do have altitude on you, so 8.0 seems possible with a manual car. stalled autos give up .2 to a well set up m5 here.
a GTO with those mods tires and equal hook will run 7.9's easy and a few mph more than you.
3400lb race weight is low for a stock mach1. if you mean with you in the car. that would be 3200lb without you if you are average 200lbs. you have some weight reductions. imo.
what is not adding up, is the 85-112mph. no way you have a sudden boost of power to get to 112 from 85 in the 1/8th.
#109
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mystic either doesn't have a slip, or it's embarassing so he won't post it. Although, for once I slightly agree with him in that it isn't pertinent to this thread.....but for all the **** you talk, you should at least post it in the BS thread, if not here. You may not have claimed a crazy time, but you talk too much **** to not post one. At least tell us if you even have 1 or not. You didn't like it when he didn't post his slip, so we are politely asking for yours, here or the BS thread.
Sadly, I might even agree with him on the mph argument. Seems slightly fishy.
Sadly, I might even agree with him on the mph argument. Seems slightly fishy.
#110
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Automach your slip has an error, you had mineshaft density altitude, or you aren't being truthful about your mods. The slip doesn't add up. I stated that it wasn't believable before but mystic the genius missed that.
Now mystic I am not going to take a hike but I can assure the bullshit you post isn't going to last long before you have to put up or shut up. You come across as a jackass and I think you would be lucky to have a time slip let alone one that is faster than a thirteen.
Now mystic I am not going to take a hike but I can assure the bullshit you post isn't going to last long before you have to put up or shut up. You come across as a jackass and I think you would be lucky to have a time slip let alone one that is faster than a thirteen.
#111
TECH Enthusiast
#112
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
WOW, so 8 mph with 150 extra whp and 200 lbs lighter??? Get real.
Also I love how on your slip that you posted. The GT was trapping 6 mph higher than you, but still managed to run a slower ET with a 1.9 60' to your 1.8.
12.7 @ 117.89 does not happen with a 1.9 60'. That trap speed is good for mid-low 11's. And a 1.9 60' is not going to cut almost 1.5 seconds off the ET.
And I have already said in past threads that I have not had my car to a track yet. You guys are just too brain dead to remember anything. WSsick you couldn't even remember saying that you were 21 a few days prior.
Also I love how on your slip that you posted. The GT was trapping 6 mph higher than you, but still managed to run a slower ET with a 1.9 60' to your 1.8.
12.7 @ 117.89 does not happen with a 1.9 60'. That trap speed is good for mid-low 11's. And a 1.9 60' is not going to cut almost 1.5 seconds off the ET.
And I have already said in past threads that I have not had my car to a track yet. You guys are just too brain dead to remember anything. WSsick you couldn't even remember saying that you were 21 a few days prior.
#113
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yes busses. ive been watching your cars race for years. seen countless runs. raced plenty of them and lost/beat plenty.
i havent really look at your slip, but i will now....
most manual machs with your very typical mods and full interior run 8.2 here. we do have altitude on you, so 8.0 seems possible with a manual car. stalled autos give up .2 to a well set up m5 here.
a GTO with those mods tires and equal hook will run 7.9's easy and a few mph more than you.
3400lb race weight is low for a stock mach1. if you mean with you in the car. that would be 3200lb without you if you are average 200lbs. you have some weight reductions. imo.
what is not adding up, is the 85-112mph. no way you have a sudden boost of power to get to 112 from 85 in the 1/8th.
i havent really look at your slip, but i will now....
most manual machs with your very typical mods and full interior run 8.2 here. we do have altitude on you, so 8.0 seems possible with a manual car. stalled autos give up .2 to a well set up m5 here.
a GTO with those mods tires and equal hook will run 7.9's easy and a few mph more than you.
3400lb race weight is low for a stock mach1. if you mean with you in the car. that would be 3200lb without you if you are average 200lbs. you have some weight reductions. imo.
what is not adding up, is the 85-112mph. no way you have a sudden boost of power to get to 112 from 85 in the 1/8th.
![Bulls#!t](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_bs.gif)
#114
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
WOW, so 8 mph with 150 extra whp and 200 lbs lighter??? Get real.
Also I love how on your slip that you posted. The GT was trapping 6 mph higher than you, but still managed to run a slower ET with a 1.9 60' to your 1.8.
12.7 @ 117.89 does not happen with a 1.9 60'. That trap speed is good for mid-low 11's. And a 1.9 60' is not going to cut almost 1.5 seconds off the ET.
And I have already said in past threads that I have not had my car to a track yet. You guys are just too brain dead to remember anything. WSsick you couldn't even remember saying that you were 21 a few days prior.
Also I love how on your slip that you posted. The GT was trapping 6 mph higher than you, but still managed to run a slower ET with a 1.9 60' to your 1.8.
12.7 @ 117.89 does not happen with a 1.9 60'. That trap speed is good for mid-low 11's. And a 1.9 60' is not going to cut almost 1.5 seconds off the ET.
And I have already said in past threads that I have not had my car to a track yet. You guys are just too brain dead to remember anything. WSsick you couldn't even remember saying that you were 21 a few days prior.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
#115
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
WOW, so 8 mph with 150 extra whp and 200 lbs lighter??? Get real.
Also I love how on your slip that you posted. The GT was trapping 6 mph higher than you, but still managed to run a slower ET with a 1.9 60' to your 1.8.
12.7 @ 117.89 does not happen with a 1.9 60'. That trap speed is good for mid-low 11's. And a 1.9 60' is not going to cut almost 1.5 seconds off the ET.
And I have already said in past threads that I have not had my car to a track yet. You guys are just too brain dead to remember anything. WSsick you couldn't even remember saying that you were 21 a few days prior.
Also I love how on your slip that you posted. The GT was trapping 6 mph higher than you, but still managed to run a slower ET with a 1.9 60' to your 1.8.
12.7 @ 117.89 does not happen with a 1.9 60'. That trap speed is good for mid-low 11's. And a 1.9 60' is not going to cut almost 1.5 seconds off the ET.
And I have already said in past threads that I have not had my car to a track yet. You guys are just too brain dead to remember anything. WSsick you couldn't even remember saying that you were 21 a few days prior.
Btw, I was trying to be nice, but you decided to revert back to the **** talking. Oh well, I did notice some more hypocrisy in your posts in the locked thread last night after I got off. If you don't believe me, I'd be happy to show you.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#116
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gulfport, MS / Columbus, OH
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Maybe its just me or mississippi is the only place where cars with little mods can be fast? Everyone seems so bootyhurt that a mach can trap 112....I mean its all about your setup, if you can't build a quick car for your money then that's your fault but don't call people out on their times just because they have more car knowledge than you.
#117
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Or we don't concern ourselves with your life and stress over it like you do.
Btw, I was trying to be nice, but you decided to revert back to the **** talking. Oh well, I did notice some more hypocrisy in your posts in the locked thread last night after I got off. If you don't believe me, I'd be happy to show you.
Like I said, I tried to be civilized this time...
Btw, I was trying to be nice, but you decided to revert back to the **** talking. Oh well, I did notice some more hypocrisy in your posts in the locked thread last night after I got off. If you don't believe me, I'd be happy to show you.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
^^^
#119
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not bashing, just making a point. My friend ran a 13.6 stock, then a 13.6 with headers, ORY dumped and a lid. That's the kind of thing I'd avoid posting.
Also, I'm not a hood rat. Please, don't call me son, yo.
(I guess I'll let the spelling/grammar errors go, if we're over that now?)
Also, I'm not a hood rat. Please, don't call me son, yo.
(I guess I'll let the spelling/grammar errors go, if we're over that now?)
#120