Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

6.0 GTO vs. Mach 1 vs. Eaton swap GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2010, 09:46 PM
  #101  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

i'm with you guys on this. a termi swapped, 450rwhp GT is going to be quite faster than a pure termi at the same power level. it isnt adding up. also the stang has 325 DR's. he isnt gonna spin much at all.

Lift
.........Intake Flow Exhaust Flow

.200" .. 147 cfm........111 cfm
.300" ... 206cfm...... 145 cfm
.400"... 254 cfm..... 185 cfm
.500"... 291 cfm..... 204 cfm
.600"... 312 cfm.......223 cfm

just sayin. the prc 5.3 220cc numbers aint bad.

The GTO should have put busses on the mach. the GT should have put busses on the GTO. cam only LS1 should beat the GTO.

$.02
Old 12-14-2010, 09:47 PM
  #102  
Banned
 
Mystic Z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Manalishi
His times have nothing to do with you producing a slip. Your talking **** and you have to be out of the thirteens to do that. I will ignore you childish and immature name calling since that seems to be the way you operate.
Lol and my times have nothing to with this thread at all, OR voicing my own ******* opinion. So take a hike.
Old 12-14-2010, 09:48 PM
  #103  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sticks n Stones
So is that a 75 shot you are running, or 100? There, I said it. lol
Old 12-14-2010, 09:49 PM
  #104  
Banned
 
Mystic Z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^ He laughs cause he knows he is caught.
Old 12-14-2010, 09:50 PM
  #105  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by assasinator
i'm with you guys on this. a termi swapped, 450rwhp GT is going to be quite faster than a pure termi at the same power level. it isnt adding up. also the stang has 325 DR's. he isnt gonna spin much at all.

Lift
.........Intake Flow Exhaust Flow

.200" .. 147 cfm........111 cfm
.300" ... 206cfm...... 145 cfm
.400"... 254 cfm..... 185 cfm
.500"... 291 cfm..... 204 cfm
.600"... 312 cfm.......223 cfm

just sayin. the prc 5.3 220cc numbers aint bad.

The GTO should have put busses on the mach. the GT should have put busses on the GTO. cam only LS1 should beat the GTO.

$.02
lol busses motor to motor?
Old 12-14-2010, 09:51 PM
  #106  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

=Mystic Z-28;14238197]^^^ He laughs cause he knows he is caught.
wrong
Old 12-14-2010, 10:00 PM
  #107  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mystic Z-28
So a car that is making 150 rwhp more than yours, better gearing and is 200 LIGHTER, only traps 5 mph higher than you? Please excuse me while I laugh myself into a seizure.
his high trap is 120... he does not have better gearing lol
Old 12-14-2010, 10:07 PM
  #108  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by automach1
lol busses motor to motor?
yes busses. ive been watching your cars race for years. seen countless runs. raced plenty of them and lost/beat plenty.


i havent really look at your slip, but i will now....

most manual machs with your very typical mods and full interior run 8.2 here. we do have altitude on you, so 8.0 seems possible with a manual car. stalled autos give up .2 to a well set up m5 here.

a GTO with those mods tires and equal hook will run 7.9's easy and a few mph more than you.

3400lb race weight is low for a stock mach1. if you mean with you in the car. that would be 3200lb without you if you are average 200lbs. you have some weight reductions. imo.


what is not adding up, is the 85-112mph. no way you have a sudden boost of power to get to 112 from 85 in the 1/8th.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:08 PM
  #109  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Mystic either doesn't have a slip, or it's embarassing so he won't post it. Although, for once I slightly agree with him in that it isn't pertinent to this thread.....but for all the **** you talk, you should at least post it in the BS thread, if not here. You may not have claimed a crazy time, but you talk too much **** to not post one. At least tell us if you even have 1 or not. You didn't like it when he didn't post his slip, so we are politely asking for yours, here or the BS thread.


Sadly, I might even agree with him on the mph argument. Seems slightly fishy.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:09 PM
  #110  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Automach your slip has an error, you had mineshaft density altitude, or you aren't being truthful about your mods. The slip doesn't add up. I stated that it wasn't believable before but mystic the genius missed that.

Now mystic I am not going to take a hike but I can assure the bullshit you post isn't going to last long before you have to put up or shut up. You come across as a jackass and I think you would be lucky to have a time slip let alone one that is faster than a thirteen.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:09 PM
  #111  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by automach1
lol busses motor to motor?
you are vastly underestimating the "motor to motor" advantage a LS2 has over you in your best day.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:12 PM
  #112  
Banned
 
Mystic Z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
his high trap is 120... he does not have better gearing lol
WOW, so 8 mph with 150 extra whp and 200 lbs lighter??? Get real.

Also I love how on your slip that you posted. The GT was trapping 6 mph higher than you, but still managed to run a slower ET with a 1.9 60' to your 1.8.

12.7 @ 117.89 does not happen with a 1.9 60'. That trap speed is good for mid-low 11's. And a 1.9 60' is not going to cut almost 1.5 seconds off the ET.

And I have already said in past threads that I have not had my car to a track yet. You guys are just too brain dead to remember anything. WSsick you couldn't even remember saying that you were 21 a few days prior.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:12 PM
  #113  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by assasinator
yes busses. ive been watching your cars race for years. seen countless runs. raced plenty of them and lost/beat plenty.


i havent really look at your slip, but i will now....

most manual machs with your very typical mods and full interior run 8.2 here. we do have altitude on you, so 8.0 seems possible with a manual car. stalled autos give up .2 to a well set up m5 here.

a GTO with those mods tires and equal hook will run 7.9's easy and a few mph more than you.

3400lb race weight is low for a stock mach1. if you mean with you in the car. that would be 3200lb without you if you are average 200lbs. you have some weight reductions. imo.


what is not adding up, is the 85-112mph. no way you have a sudden boost of power to get to 112 from 85 in the 1/8th.
uh sounds like a bunch of bench racing
Old 12-14-2010, 10:15 PM
  #114  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mystic Z-28
WOW, so 8 mph with 150 extra whp and 200 lbs lighter??? Get real.

Also I love how on your slip that you posted. The GT was trapping 6 mph higher than you, but still managed to run a slower ET with a 1.9 60' to your 1.8.

12.7 @ 117.89 does not happen with a 1.9 60'. That trap speed is good for mid-low 11's. And a 1.9 60' is not going to cut almost 1.5 seconds off the ET.

And I have already said in past threads that I have not had my car to a track yet. You guys are just too brain dead to remember anything. WSsick you couldn't even remember saying that you were 21 a few days prior.
he is not the best of drivers and yea it is good for those ets with sub 1.7 60fts
Old 12-14-2010, 10:17 PM
  #115  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mystic Z-28
WOW, so 8 mph with 150 extra whp and 200 lbs lighter??? Get real.

Also I love how on your slip that you posted. The GT was trapping 6 mph higher than you, but still managed to run a slower ET with a 1.9 60' to your 1.8.

12.7 @ 117.89 does not happen with a 1.9 60'. That trap speed is good for mid-low 11's. And a 1.9 60' is not going to cut almost 1.5 seconds off the ET.

And I have already said in past threads that I have not had my car to a track yet. You guys are just too brain dead to remember anything. WSsick you couldn't even remember saying that you were 21 a few days prior.
Or we don't concern ourselves with your life and stress over it like you do.

Btw, I was trying to be nice, but you decided to revert back to the **** talking. Oh well, I did notice some more hypocrisy in your posts in the locked thread last night after I got off. If you don't believe me, I'd be happy to show you. Like I said, I tried to be civilized this time...
Old 12-14-2010, 10:18 PM
  #116  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BStowers023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gulfport, MS / Columbus, OH
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe its just me or mississippi is the only place where cars with little mods can be fast? Everyone seems so bootyhurt that a mach can trap 112....I mean its all about your setup, if you can't build a quick car for your money then that's your fault but don't call people out on their times just because they have more car knowledge than you.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:23 PM
  #117  
Banned
 
Mystic Z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WSsick
Or we don't concern ourselves with your life and stress over it like you do.

Btw, I was trying to be nice, but you decided to revert back to the **** talking. Oh well, I did notice some more hypocrisy in your posts in the locked thread last night after I got off. If you don't believe me, I'd be happy to show you. Like I said, I tried to be civilized this time...
You immediately started bashing me, son. Don't give me any of that ''I was trying to be civilized crap''.

Originally Posted by WSsick

Mystic either doesn't have a slip, or it's embarassing so he won't post it.
^^^
Old 12-14-2010, 10:26 PM
  #118  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
The Manalishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

That's what I figured mystic.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:26 PM
  #119  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Not bashing, just making a point. My friend ran a 13.6 stock, then a 13.6 with headers, ORY dumped and a lid. That's the kind of thing I'd avoid posting.

Also, I'm not a hood rat. Please, don't call me son, yo.

(I guess I'll let the spelling/grammar errors go, if we're over that now?)
Old 12-14-2010, 10:28 PM
  #120  
Banned
 
Mystic Z-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
he is not the best of drivers and yea it is good for those ets with sub 1.7 60fts
So let me get this straight? You think that going from a 1.9 60' to a 1.7 60' is going to knock almost 1.5 seconds off someone's ET??? I feel another seizure coming on...


Quick Reply: 6.0 GTO vs. Mach 1 vs. Eaton swap GT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 AM.