Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

LS2 GTO vs 2011 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2011, 05:24 PM
  #61  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

seems you found the lowest dyno for a manual transmission (im taking your word for it that its a manual, but i have my doubts still since those are auto-type numbers). 350rwhp??pfffffft LOL

Last edited by MauriSSio; 01-12-2011 at 05:34 PM.
Old 01-12-2011, 05:36 PM
  #62  
Teching In
 
Bdubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Ulm, MN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
Relying on 5.0 Mustangs and Fast Ford Magazines for accurate information is like watching Fox News for accurate and fair political information.

Seriously did you just reference the 2 biggest Mustang fanboi magazines in existence to try and prove your point?
Yeah ok cause they've tested every single new aftermarket part on these cars including NOS and every blower available. While your getting all your useful info off the internet, this so called crappy mag has been doing mods to these 2011's since they came out. How many have you worked on?




Last edited by Bdubbs; 01-12-2011 at 05:44 PM.
Old 01-12-2011, 05:42 PM
  #63  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just another one for fun:
378rwhp
Old 01-12-2011, 05:45 PM
  #64  
Teching In
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Go watch Fox News.
Oh and Jim Cramer is a huge stock guru, get all your financial advice from him.

None of those dyno sheets hold any value since they don't show the conditions of the run and the correction factor that was used. Like I said before the CF's are abused to **** especially by places/magazines with an agenda such as vendors, shops, and fanboi mags. Which is exactly the place you got your info. All you did by proving Mustang Fanboi Magazine got more power in 4th than in 5th is that they are not a reputable source of information since that finding is just wrong.

Oh, and they used a Dynapack, which is the easily the highest reading dyno out there without messing with CF's.

Last edited by Ju1ce; 01-12-2011 at 05:51 PM.
Old 01-12-2011, 05:48 PM
  #65  
Teching In
 
Bdubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Ulm, MN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm a little butt hurt it seems. Take a hike.
Old 01-12-2011, 05:51 PM
  #66  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
Go watch Fox News.
Oh and Jim Cramer is a huge stock guru, get all your financial advice from him.

None of those dyno sheets hold any value since they don't show the conditions of the run and the correction factor that was used. Like I said before the CF's are abused to **** especially by places/magazines with an agenda such as vendors, shops, and fanboi mags. Which is exactly the place you got your info.
LOL another tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist

all 5.0 dynos are inflated and all LS dynos are correct, i shoulda known.
Old 01-12-2011, 05:52 PM
  #67  
Teching In
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bdubbs
Hmm a little butt hurt it seems. Take a hike.
The problem with being one of the few smart people is that all the stupid people gang up on you and agree with eachother. To the untrained eye (stupid people) it may look like you guys have the upper hand here...
Old 01-12-2011, 05:54 PM
  #68  
Teching In
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
LOL another tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist

all 5.0 dynos are inflated and all LS dynos are correct, i shoulda known.
No one ever said all LS dynos are correct. But I could show you easily how my headers/tune GTO can put down 410whp SAE (when in reality it truly put down around 380). I'd have a dyno slip to prove it, **** I could even tell everyone I'm a l33t tuner with my HP tuners and make an assload of money off the sheep, isn't that what most shops are all about?

I've watched first hand friends (well not anymore) of mine who work dynos play with the CF to show customers their tune was the best. It's ****** stealing and lying and it happens EVERYWHERE. If you're wondering why the baseline should be high to start it's so their final number is always higher than the next guy. Which is why you have stock dynos ranging from Joe Schmoe going to his local Mustang dyno and putting down a legit 335-340whp, to Joe Steal Your Business Shop L33T tunes putting down 395 stock.

Where are you gonna go? Somewhere that a tune gets you to 360-370whp or somewhere that you can lay down 430 with a catback and a tune?

Last edited by Ju1ce; 01-12-2011 at 06:04 PM.
Old 01-12-2011, 06:06 PM
  #69  
Teching In
 
Bdubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Ulm, MN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
The problem with being one of the few smart people is that all the stupid people gang up on you and agree with eachother. To the untrained eye (stupid people) it may look like you guys have the upper hand here...
Really intelligent comment you have there. As to your post above, it's a no-brainer that dyno shops can inflate #'s and make there dyno read higher than others, I'm sure you didn't find that one out of a car magazine, congrats!
Old 01-12-2011, 06:08 PM
  #70  
Launching!
 
MauriSSio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
No one ever said all LS dynos are correct. But I could show you easily how my headers/tune GTO can put down 410whp SAE (when in reality it truly put down around 380). I'd have a dyno slip to prove it, **** I could even tell everyone I'm a l33t tuner with my HP tuners and make an assload of money off the sheep, isn't that what most shops are all about?

I've watched first hand friends (well not anymore) of mine who work dynos play with the CF to show customers their tune was the best. It's ****** stealing and lying and it happens EVERYWHERE. If you're wondering why the baseline should be high to start it's so their final number is always higher than the next guy. Which is why you have stock dynos ranging from Joe Schmoe going to his local Mustang dyno and putting down a legit 335-340whp, to Joe Steal Your Business Shop L33T tunes putting down 395 stock.

Where are you gonna go? Somewhere that a tune gets you to 360-370whp or somewhere that you can lay down 430 with a catback and a tune?
ok. But if that was the case THEY WOULD MANIPULATE THE STOCK BASELINE NUMBERS TO BE LOWER. so that the "tune" would have a huge increase.
Old 01-12-2011, 06:18 PM
  #71  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I'm not trying to get in a dyno war here, but numbers are numbers. They very from dyno to dyno and are only good for giving you a baseline when modding to see what you are picking up. The 5.0 is a hell of a car and from what I'm seeing they run mid to high twelves pretty consistently. I've read reports that they are also underrated from factory much like how the ls1's in the fbody were years ago.
Old 01-12-2011, 06:20 PM
  #72  
Teching In
 
Bdubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Ulm, MN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by willizm
I'm not trying to get in a dyno war here, but numbers are numbers. They very from dyno to dyno and are only good for giving you a baseline when modding to see what you are picking up. The 5.0 is a hell of a car and from what I'm seeing they run mid to high twelves pretty consistently. I've read reports that they are also underrated from factory much like how the ls1's in the fbody were years ago.
Very true.
Old 01-12-2011, 06:26 PM
  #73  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Nacho SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 805-818
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Dyno racing...didn't know I logged on to supraforums here.

Old 01-12-2011, 06:43 PM
  #74  
Teching In
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
ok. But if that was the case THEY WOULD MANIPULATE THE STOCK BASELINE NUMBERS TO BE LOWER. so that the "tune" would have a huge increase.
It's a delicate process. They want the numbers to be higher so the end number is higher. If they just blatantly ran it to both extremes people would ask more questions.
Old 01-12-2011, 06:46 PM
  #75  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
necrocannibal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

Originally Posted by MauriSSio
and heres one from one of LS1TECHS SPONSORS--372rwhp

That sheet clearly shows a basline around 340 or so and a best of tuned around 370 or so. Believeable numbers IMO.
Old 01-12-2011, 06:50 PM
  #76  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

340 is a bit low, I think.
Old 01-12-2011, 06:53 PM
  #77  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
necrocannibal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
340 is a bit low, I think.
Just reading the graph, sorry it doesnt read 627 rwhp baseline.
Old 01-12-2011, 06:54 PM
  #78  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There's a 395rwhp graph too. Sorry it doesn't read 273 rwhp baseline.
Old 01-12-2011, 06:54 PM
  #79  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

you know i never did a tune only dyno run. i wish i had i guess. the dyno i went to specializes in ricers. hes done a few 5.0's. he doesnt tune them just dyno sessions. my drive-it-in and dyno 398 is believable. i did it hot because i wanted to know real world as-driven daily numbers.

next time im going to cool it so coolant temps are 170 at run time and the car is cool. its gonna be a hero run. a/f datalogging puts it near perfect as is. nice thing coyotes COME with widebands stock.


i dont think i will beat every ls2 i run into. gonna lose some and win some.
Old 01-12-2011, 07:00 PM
  #80  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default




there is a back to back 4th gear and 5th gear dyno run. 3 minutes or so apart with no shut down. 5th is always higher.


the 383.54 run was 4th gear, the other two were 5th gear. call the dyno operator and see.

he did it in 4th because he didnt know 5th was 1:1.


Quick Reply: LS2 GTO vs 2011 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.