Turbo Civic vs 05 Mustang GT and 03 Cobra
03-30-2011, 06:44 AM
#67
Launching!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good racing and Id mount that cobra skin to my wall and stretch out all 5 foot 10 inches of it. Fast ride he took down. If I watched the video correctly then thats a 510 rwhp Cobra and that car would run even with a stock Z06 and he pulled it pretty convincingly.
03-30-2011, 09:36 AM
#68
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis Area
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Naaaaa. just pokeing fun at the OP. Cars a car. Just metal and plastic. From the lowest civic to the highest Ferrari.
Good racing and Id mount that cobra skin to my wall and stretch out all 5 foot 10 inches of it. Fast ride he took down. If I watched the video correctly then thats a 510 rwhp Cobra and that car would run even with a stock Z06 and he pulled it pretty convincingly.
Good racing and Id mount that cobra skin to my wall and stretch out all 5 foot 10 inches of it. Fast ride he took down. If I watched the video correctly then thats a 510 rwhp Cobra and that car would run even with a stock Z06 and he pulled it pretty convincingly.
03-30-2011, 10:25 AM
#71
03-30-2011, 11:34 AM
#73
10 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LT,
I assume you can get a decent idea of your acceleration times off your datalogger/tuning software, right?
What are you seeing for times once you get rolling? 60-130 on a flat road is always a good universal measure.
I assume you can get a decent idea of your acceleration times off your datalogger/tuning software, right?
What are you seeing for times once you get rolling? 60-130 on a flat road is always a good universal measure.
03-30-2011, 12:45 PM
#74
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis Area
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll have to check but spinning and letting off 80-130 is roughly 4.5-4.8 at 30lbs. I'll look at the 20lb pulls where I was using 3rd for 60.
Last edited by LightningTeg; 03-30-2011 at 12:52 PM.
03-30-2011, 01:09 PM
#75
Launching!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not much. Only hopeing for 500 rwhp SAE.
The cam is just a competition coupe camshaft that is listed as a 6-8 HP increase for the Viper. Though tuners have told me it's actually 10-15 rwhp. It's a dodge part thats still covered through warranty.
Only differance between the comp coupe viper and regular viper is the cam/differant headers/tune. So it's a kool way to have a little peice of the comp coupe in my Viper as Im a BIG fan of the comp coupes.
I was 476 rwhp
Changed my tune from SCT tune to a differant SCT tune
added the cam
added new plugs and wires
added an air intake
added a koolr thermostat
car put down 466 rwhp
Turns out mt new tune was bad because we loaded in the OEM stock tune and the power went to 475 rwhp.
So now the tuner is checking the AFR and dyno charts ect. So far it seems the AFR is OK at 12.5 but the timing is REALLY conservative. Even more so then the stock tune and thats why the stock tune made 10 rwhp more than my SCT tune.
So should be getting the new tune via email today and Ill go redyno.
The 470's SAE on the stock tune is promiseing so still hopeing for 500 rwhp SAE
-HIJACK OVER-
The cam is just a competition coupe camshaft that is listed as a 6-8 HP increase for the Viper. Though tuners have told me it's actually 10-15 rwhp. It's a dodge part thats still covered through warranty.
Only differance between the comp coupe viper and regular viper is the cam/differant headers/tune. So it's a kool way to have a little peice of the comp coupe in my Viper as Im a BIG fan of the comp coupes.
I was 476 rwhp
Changed my tune from SCT tune to a differant SCT tune
added the cam
added new plugs and wires
added an air intake
added a koolr thermostat
car put down 466 rwhp
Turns out mt new tune was bad because we loaded in the OEM stock tune and the power went to 475 rwhp.
So now the tuner is checking the AFR and dyno charts ect. So far it seems the AFR is OK at 12.5 but the timing is REALLY conservative. Even more so then the stock tune and thats why the stock tune made 10 rwhp more than my SCT tune.
So should be getting the new tune via email today and Ill go redyno.
The 470's SAE on the stock tune is promiseing so still hopeing for 500 rwhp SAE
-HIJACK OVER-
03-30-2011, 01:20 PM
#76
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis Area
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not much. Only hopeing for 500 rwhp SAE.
The cam is just a competition coupe camshaft that is listed as a 6-8 HP increase for the Viper. Though tuners have told me it's actually 10-15 rwhp. It's a dodge part thats still covered through warranty.
Only differance between the comp coupe viper and regular viper is the cam/differant headers/tune. So it's a kool way to have a little peice of the comp coupe in my Viper as Im a BIG fan of the comp coupes.
I was 476 rwhp
Changed my tune from SCT tune to a differant SCT tune
added the cam
added new plugs and wires
added an air intake
added a koolr thermostat
car put down 466 rwhp
Turns out mt new tune was bad because we loaded in the OEM stock tune and the power went to 475 rwhp.
So now the tuner is checking the AFR and dyno charts ect. So far it seems the AFR is OK at 12.5 but the timing is REALLY conservative. Even more so then the stock tune and thats why the stock tune made 10 rwhp more than my SCT tune.
So should be getting the new tune via email today and Ill go redyno.
The 470's SAE on the stock tune is promiseing so still hopeing for 500 rwhp SAE
-HIJACK OVER-
The cam is just a competition coupe camshaft that is listed as a 6-8 HP increase for the Viper. Though tuners have told me it's actually 10-15 rwhp. It's a dodge part thats still covered through warranty.
Only differance between the comp coupe viper and regular viper is the cam/differant headers/tune. So it's a kool way to have a little peice of the comp coupe in my Viper as Im a BIG fan of the comp coupes.
I was 476 rwhp
Changed my tune from SCT tune to a differant SCT tune
added the cam
added new plugs and wires
added an air intake
added a koolr thermostat
car put down 466 rwhp
Turns out mt new tune was bad because we loaded in the OEM stock tune and the power went to 475 rwhp.
So now the tuner is checking the AFR and dyno charts ect. So far it seems the AFR is OK at 12.5 but the timing is REALLY conservative. Even more so then the stock tune and thats why the stock tune made 10 rwhp more than my SCT tune.
So should be getting the new tune via email today and Ill go redyno.
The 470's SAE on the stock tune is promiseing so still hopeing for 500 rwhp SAE
-HIJACK OVER-
Was talking to WilliamZ
03-30-2011, 01:38 PM
#77
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Lol no one cars about a oem viper coupe compitition grade camshaft(er whatever it's called), 
I'm shooting for whatever my fueling will allow for. Thats going to be the bottle neck, but with what I got I should be able to hit around 700whp, but will probably drive around on a 500-550whp power level at around 7-9lbs of boost. Have tru boost controller and plan on using scramble boost if I need but doubt I'll have to hit it often for most encounters. Hard to say until I get it all together and see what she does on the dyno. My setup should support well into 17-19lbs of boost.
I'm shooting for whatever my fueling will allow for. Thats going to be the bottle neck, but with what I got I should be able to hit around 700whp, but will probably drive around on a 500-550whp power level at around 7-9lbs of boost. Have tru boost controller and plan on using scramble boost if I need but doubt I'll have to hit it often for most encounters. Hard to say until I get it all together and see what she does on the dyno. My setup should support well into 17-19lbs of boost.
Killemall, noone was talking to you about your car. We don't care about it, even though you think we do. Funny that you lost power through your car swap. So how much lighter is your wallet now? $3,000? 
03-30-2011, 03:47 PM
#80
10 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW, i stumbled across the 60-130 time from the 1069awhp AMS GT-R... 3.53 seconds (same car went 9.1 @ 151).
That's 20mph of acceleration per second starting from highway speeds...insane.