03 cobra vs 03 mach 1 - Page 2 - LS1TECH - Camaro and Firebird Forum Discussion



Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

03 cobra vs 03 mach 1

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-11-2011, 11:23 PM   #21
Teching In
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by automach1 View Post
laughing want magically make my numbers any slower
I think you mean "won't".
My laughing is a result of reality making your numbers slower.


Seriously if you think you really trapped 112mph you must not have graduated high school yet.
Ju1ce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 04:57 PM   #22
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by automach1 View Post
Either way with a even hit and a tire on the cobra I am almost positive i would pull out a solid car from a 20 Yea it does well from where it counts
On a ported/pulley '03 Cobra with drag radials? From what... 20-30mph?
Irunelevens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 05:05 PM   #23
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
02ws666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 537
Default

i might be thread hijacking, but this question is for Ju1ce. i trapped 91mph in the 1/8 what should i trap in the 1/4? only ran a 8.0 with a 1.96 60ft tho ******* 10 bolt.

and is that good for a cam only car?
02ws666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 05:43 PM   #24
Teching In
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 02ws666 View Post
i might be thread hijacking, but this question is for Ju1ce. i trapped 91mph in the 1/8 what should i trap in the 1/4? only ran a 8.0 with a 1.96 60ft tho ******* 10 bolt.

and is that good for a cam only car?
112-113 at a legit track. It's not awful for a cam only car.
I'm sure in good conditions with better driving you could trap a good bit higher.

For example Automach trapped "112" (actually 106ish) in -1500 DA. You probably ran in DA much higher.

Last edited by Ju1ce; 04-12-2011 at 05:48 PM.
Ju1ce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:00 PM   #25
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irunelevens View Post
On a ported/pulley '03 Cobra with drag radials? From what... 20-30mph?
15-20 hit pulley 03 with radials
automach1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:01 PM   #26
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ju1ce View Post
112-113 at a legit track. It's not awful for a cam only car.
I'm sure in good conditions with better driving you could trap a good bit higher.

For example Automach trapped "112" (actually 106ish) in -1500 DA. You probably ran in DA much higher.
112 in +700 112.5 corrected
automach1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:03 PM   #27
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by automach1 View Post
15-20 hit pulley 03 with radials
Well in your OP it does say ported as well...

Quote:
Originally Posted by automach1
Well it was my first weekend out with the longtubes and suspension so I decided to test it out on a friends 03 jms ported 2.8 pulley exhaust cobra traped 120-121 at the track awhile back. Wanted a dig but he had street tires oh well. Did a 20 roll and 40 roll. From the 20 I had about a half car lead when i shut it down from a 40 he got me by about 2 cars little bit of a bog for me in 2nd but it was fun clean runs. btw camera car is a bolt-on ls6 ctsv
Irunelevens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:04 PM   #28
Teching In
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by automach1 View Post
112 in +700 112.5 corrected
105 corrected. It's painfully obvious you didn't trap 112. The ET's through the back half of the track don't even come close to lining up to the MPH. 3rd graders in math class could figure this out.
Ju1ce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:06 PM   #29
Teching In
 
BlkMach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: S. Fla.
Posts: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ju1ce View Post
105 corrected. It's painfully obvious you didn't trap 112. The ET's through the back half of the track don't even come close to lining up to the MPH. 3rd graders in math class could figure this out.
It obvious he didnt make it to third grade, Juice, which is why his math does not add up.
BlkMach1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:11 PM   #30
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlkMach1 View Post
It obvious he didnt make it to third grade, Juice, which is why his math does not add up.
111.88 in +700 if that makes you feel any better
automach1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:14 PM   #31
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ju1ce View Post
105 corrected. It's painfully obvious you didn't trap 112. The ET's through the back half of the track don't even come close to lining up to the MPH. 3rd graders in math class could figure this out.
I traped as high as 87 and i already mentioned that the 1/8th reads a little low at this track for the most part
automach1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:14 PM   #32
Teching In
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by automach1 View Post
111.88 in +700 if that makes you feel any better
You didn't trap 111.88, or anywhere close to it.
Ju1ce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:15 PM   #33
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ju1ce View Post
You didn't trap 111.88, or anywhere close to it.

Wrong.
automach1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:16 PM   #34
Teching In
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by automach1 View Post
I traped as high as 87 and i already mentioned that the 1/8th reads a little low at this track for the most part
Doesn't matter, I can show you a legitimate slip that shows a car out trapping you in the 1/8th and moving quicker through the back half of the track by a solid amount, yet trapping lower in the 1/4. Which isn't possible unless the driver hit the brakes... and I didn't hit the brakes.
Ju1ce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:18 PM   #35
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ju1ce View Post
Doesn't matter, I can show you a legitimate slip that shows a car out trapping you in the 1/8th and moving quicker through the back half of the track by a solid amount, yet trapping lower in the 1/4. Which isn't possible unless the driver hit the brakes... and I didn't hit the brakes.
So basically you are just jelly that 298>gto?
automach1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:26 PM   #36
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Default

Correction just looked it up again http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...ect+ET+and+MPH
automach1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:32 PM   #37
Teching In
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by automach1 View Post
So basically you are just jelly that 298>gto?
Let's not get off topic... my Regal is faster than your Mach, you're nowhere near the GTO.



Here's my slip (when stock!) laid next to yours.

You're getting out trapped by 3.48mph at the 1/8th and you're 1 tenth quicker ET.

340ft later you're losing by a hundereth. Meaning in 340ft my stock GTO pulled around your Mach-1.

320ft later you're losing by nearly a tenth... indicating that my stock GTO has pulled away from your Mach-1.

Here's the clincher... in the last 660ft, you started 3.48 mph slower, but ended .014mph higher at the same time you got yanked from being a tenth ahead to a tenth behind (roughly a 2 car pull in 660ft).

I'd love for you to try and justify this logically.
Ju1ce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:36 PM   #38
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ju1ce View Post
Let's not get off topic... my Regal is faster than your Mach, you're nowhere near the GTO.



Here's my slip (when stock!) laid next to yours.

You're getting out trapped by 3.48mph at the 1/8th and you're 1 tenth quicker ET.

340ft later you're losing by a hundereth. Meaning in 340ft my stock GTO pulled around your Mach-1.

320ft later you're losing by nearly a tenth... indicating that my stock GTO has pulled away from your Mach-1.

Here's the clincher... in the last 660ft, you started 3.48 mph slower, but ended .014mph higher at the same time you got yanked from being a tenth ahead to a tenth behind (roughly a 2 car pull in 660ft).

I'd love for you to try and justify this logically.
Welll i will be hiting the track again soon Mr. bench racer What is the best pass in the goat
automach1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:40 PM   #39
Teching In
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 16
Default

http://www.dragtimes.com/Ford-Mustan...slip-4838.html

Here's a mach-1 just like yours...

1/4 Mile ET: 12.735
1/4 Mile MPH: 108.840
1/8 Mile ET: 8.209
1/8 Mile MPH: 86.730

Out trapped your Mach-1 by 1.5mph in the 1/8th and STILL only trapped 108.8. The slip also suggests he was moving quicker on the back half as a whole since he went from 2 tenths back to only 1 tenth back.
Face it, your car was a 105-106mph car AT BEST and with your new mods you'll be LUCKY to go 110.

Better hope that you go to the same track and they have the same Fisher Price timing system.
Ju1ce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 07:43 PM   #40
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Default

111.88 in + 1131 got to love it.... I am glad I looked it up again thanks ju1ce lol
automach1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can it be done cancam99ss Appearance & Detailing 21 09-04-2016 11:28 AM
Finally Installed My GMMG catback 95LTXZ28 Generation III External Engine 29 11-08-2014 07:03 PM
first time out with lq4 powered mustang bluecajun5.3 Carbureted LSX Forum 33 12-10-2011 06:42 PM
Regal GS vs Nissan Maxima NightmareTA Street Racing & Kill Stories 13 08-01-2010 09:58 AM
True Dual sound clip (Spintech mufflers) The1N_only Generation III External Engine 6 01-14-2007 10:41 PM


Tags
03, 1, 2003, 3cobra, automatic, car, changing, cobra, mach, mississippi, mods, points, shift, slow, trading

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 PM.


 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: