03 cobra vs 03 mach 1
04-11-2011, 11:23 PM
#21
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-12-2011, 04:57 PM
#22
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-12-2011, 05:05 PM
#23
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i might be thread hijacking, but this question is for Ju1ce. i trapped 91mph in the 1/8 what should i trap in the 1/4? only ran a 8.0 with a 1.96 60ft tho 
******* 10 bolt.
and is that good for a cam only car?
******* 10 bolt.and is that good for a cam only car?
04-12-2011, 05:43 PM
#24
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure in good conditions with better driving you could trap a good bit higher.
For example Automach trapped "112" (actually 106ish) in -1500 DA. You probably ran in DA much higher.
Last edited by Ju1ce; 04-12-2011 at 05:48 PM.
04-12-2011, 07:01 PM
#26
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
112 in +700 112.5 corrected
04-12-2011, 07:03 PM
#27
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well in your OP it does say ported as well...
Originally Posted by automach1
Well it was my first weekend out with the longtubes and suspension so I decided to test it out on a friends 03 jms ported 2.8 pulley exhaust cobra traped 120-121 at the track awhile back. Wanted a dig but he had street tires oh well. Did a 20 roll and 40 roll. From the 20 I had about a half car lead when i shut it down from a 40 he got me by about 2 cars little bit of a bog for me in 2nd but it was fun clean runs. btw camera car is a bolt-on ls6 ctsv
04-12-2011, 07:04 PM
#28
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-12-2011, 07:06 PM
#29
It obvious he didnt make it to third grade, Juice, which is why his math does not add up.
04-12-2011, 07:11 PM
#30
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-12-2011, 07:14 PM
#31
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I traped as high as 87 and i already mentioned that the 1/8th reads a little low at this track for the most part
04-12-2011, 07:16 PM
#34
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doesn't matter, I can show you a legitimate slip that shows a car out trapping you in the 1/8th and moving quicker through the back half of the track by a solid amount, yet trapping lower in the 1/4. Which isn't possible unless the driver hit the brakes... and I didn't hit the brakes.
04-12-2011, 07:18 PM
#35
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doesn't matter, I can show you a legitimate slip that shows a car out trapping you in the 1/8th and moving quicker through the back half of the track by a solid amount, yet trapping lower in the 1/4. Which isn't possible unless the driver hit the brakes... and I didn't hit the brakes.
04-12-2011, 07:26 PM
#36
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-12-2011, 07:32 PM
#37
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let's not get off topic... my Regal is faster than your Mach, you're nowhere near the GTO.
Here's my slip (when stock!) laid next to yours.
You're getting out trapped by 3.48mph at the 1/8th and you're 1 tenth quicker ET.
340ft later you're losing by a hundereth. Meaning in 340ft my stock GTO pulled around your Mach-1.
320ft later you're losing by nearly a tenth... indicating that my stock GTO has pulled away from your Mach-1.
Here's the clincher... in the last 660ft, you started 3.48 mph slower, but ended .014mph higher at the same time you got yanked from being a tenth ahead to a tenth behind (roughly a 2 car pull in 660ft).
I'd love for you to try and justify this logically.
Here's my slip (when stock!) laid next to yours.
You're getting out trapped by 3.48mph at the 1/8th and you're 1 tenth quicker ET.
340ft later you're losing by a hundereth. Meaning in 340ft my stock GTO pulled around your Mach-1.
320ft later you're losing by nearly a tenth... indicating that my stock GTO has pulled away from your Mach-1.
Here's the clincher... in the last 660ft, you started 3.48 mph slower, but ended .014mph higher at the same time you got yanked from being a tenth ahead to a tenth behind (roughly a 2 car pull in 660ft).
I'd love for you to try and justify this logically.
04-12-2011, 07:36 PM
#38
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let's not get off topic... my Regal is faster than your Mach, you're nowhere near the GTO.
Here's my slip (when stock!) laid next to yours.
You're getting out trapped by 3.48mph at the 1/8th and you're 1 tenth quicker ET.
340ft later you're losing by a hundereth. Meaning in 340ft my stock GTO pulled around your Mach-1.
320ft later you're losing by nearly a tenth... indicating that my stock GTO has pulled away from your Mach-1.
Here's the clincher... in the last 660ft, you started 3.48 mph slower, but ended .014mph higher at the same time you got yanked from being a tenth ahead to a tenth behind (roughly a 2 car pull in 660ft).
I'd love for you to try and justify this logically.
Here's my slip (when stock!) laid next to yours.
You're getting out trapped by 3.48mph at the 1/8th and you're 1 tenth quicker ET.
340ft later you're losing by a hundereth. Meaning in 340ft my stock GTO pulled around your Mach-1.
320ft later you're losing by nearly a tenth... indicating that my stock GTO has pulled away from your Mach-1.
Here's the clincher... in the last 660ft, you started 3.48 mph slower, but ended .014mph higher at the same time you got yanked from being a tenth ahead to a tenth behind (roughly a 2 car pull in 660ft).
I'd love for you to try and justify this logically.
What is the best pass in the goat 
04-12-2011, 07:40 PM
#39
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.dragtimes.com/Ford-Mustan...slip-4838.html
Here's a mach-1 just like yours...
1/4 Mile ET: 12.735
1/4 Mile MPH: 108.840
1/8 Mile ET: 8.209
1/8 Mile MPH: 86.730
Out trapped your Mach-1 by 1.5mph in the 1/8th and STILL only trapped 108.8. The slip also suggests he was moving quicker on the back half as a whole since he went from 2 tenths back to only 1 tenth back.
Face it, your car was a 105-106mph car AT BEST and with your new mods you'll be LUCKY to go 110.
Better hope that you go to the same track and they have the same Fisher Price timing system.
Here's a mach-1 just like yours...
1/4 Mile ET: 12.735
1/4 Mile MPH: 108.840
1/8 Mile ET: 8.209
1/8 Mile MPH: 86.730
Out trapped your Mach-1 by 1.5mph in the 1/8th and STILL only trapped 108.8. The slip also suggests he was moving quicker on the back half as a whole since he went from 2 tenths back to only 1 tenth back.
Face it, your car was a 105-106mph car AT BEST and with your new mods you'll be LUCKY to go 110.
Better hope that you go to the same track and they have the same Fisher Price timing system.