Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Got punished by a brand new SRT8 Challenger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2011, 01:05 AM
  #81  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MACH32V
I was at the local 1/8 mile track last night and I saw a blue SRT8. It was NOT the 392. Regardless it was a sweet looking car and it sounded awesome coming off the line. Best he could run last night was 9.29 @79mph in the 1/8. This was his best run all night but all his times were right around there.
Now if this was a 392, I am sure it would run harder than the 6.1L Hemi motor. I think if Chrysler would just trim some of the fat on the bodies, they would have one fast *** ride. The motors make a ton of power but the bodies are just to heavy.
thats a horrible time for a 6.1, I ran faster then that bone stock with a 220+lb passenger lol
Old 10-01-2011, 01:05 AM
  #82  
Teching In
 
garner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
Its just all talk and rumors right now just like the Durango SRT8. However the sales are down big time on the Challengers
And the ram SRT8(R/T with 6.4 and all the upgrades) and the ram SS/T(express with the 6.4). Hopefully they make all of them
Old 10-01-2011, 02:30 AM
  #83  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just dont get it guys are running 12.3@113-114 pretty consistently bone stock with the 392's in normal DA but it sure didnt pull like a 12.3 car but I could be wrong. I did a couple of 1-2-3 pulls and I just wasn't impressed. Then again it only had 10 miles on it so maybe because it wasnt broken in.
Old 10-01-2011, 02:48 AM
  #84  
Teching In
 
garner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Me and a sales manager took one up to 140 and I thought it pulled pretty hard then again fastest car I've driven/rode in is my high 14 second truck so it's probably a lot different than going from your car to the 392 since they're closer in performance. After that we took the sms 570 challenger they have for a spin and that pulled even harder
Old 10-01-2011, 10:49 AM
  #85  
11 Second Club
 
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sticks n Stones
The OP's friend bought the 392 charger SRT8, not just a regular SRT8. The 392 is a bored/stroked SRT8 with alot more power= I heard they dyno in the 430rwhp range bone stock. Also, OP's choice of camshafts leaves alot to be desired: the C5 Z06 cam is tiny, only marginally bigger then a stock LS1 cam.
Ninja Edit: Watched a brand new 392ci at the JJ performance dyno event last weekend. IIRC his exact numbers were 403/412.

Off the juice I dynoed 332/345 (about 25hp less than expected.) On a bit of the dope mine did 402/476...
Old 10-05-2011, 07:58 PM
  #86  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
jdustu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: detroit rock city
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sticks n Stones
The OP's friend bought the 392 charger SRT8, not just a regular SRT8. The 392 is a bored/stroked SRT8 with alot more power= I heard they dyno in the 430rwhp range bone stock. Also, OP's choice of camshafts leaves alot to be desired: the C5 Z06 cam is tiny, only marginally bigger then a stock LS1 cam.
"392" SRT8 is a regular SRT8, just a 2nd gen rather than a 1st gen. The 6.4 is a substantial improvement over the 6.1 in pretty much every way.


Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
Just test drove a 392 tonight. At 49K Im highly disappointed in the 6.4 so far. It felt so damn sluggish it was unreal I know for a fact My Intake, Tune, Exhaust 6.1 would beat it.
Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
I just dont get it guys are running 12.3@113-114 pretty consistently bone stock with the 392's in normal DA but it sure didnt pull like a 12.3 car but I could be wrong. I did a couple of 1-2-3 pulls and I just wasn't impressed. Then again it only had 10 miles on it so maybe because it wasnt broken in.
I've driven a '12 Charger SRT8. Definitely didn't "feel" like the 470+ hp car it is. It really didn't "feel" any quicker than my 13 second truck. But the thing is so smooth....there's no burst, it just keeps building. It's huge, and it's as much of luxo car as a performance car. It is REALLY nice. Gilles made it very clear they aren't trying to compete with the SSs or GTs, they're trying to build a niche vehicle. People can complain about the price, and if all you want to do is go fast there are obviously better options(aren't there always?) but as of now SRT has always been a money maker.
Old 10-05-2011, 08:01 PM
  #87  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jdustu
"392" SRT8 is a regular SRT8, just a 2nd gen rather than a 1st gen. The 6.4 is a substantial improvement over the 6.1 in pretty much every way.






I've driven a '12 Charger SRT8. Definitely didn't "feel" like the 470+ hp car it is. It really didn't "feel" any quicker than my 13 second truck. But the thing is so smooth....there's no burst, it just keeps building. It's huge, and it's as much of luxo car as a performance car. It is REALLY nice. Gilles made it very clear they aren't trying to compete with the SSs or GTs, they're trying to build a niche vehicle. People can complain about the price, and if all you want to do is go fast there are obviously better options(aren't there always?) but as of now SRT has always been a money maker.
Its crazy how fast they are dropping in price once they leave the lot. They are asking 49K for the 392 here. A used one with 2K miles on it is 38K
Old 10-05-2011, 08:13 PM
  #88  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
jdustu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: detroit rock city
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I can't say that I've seen a used one for sale. If that's the norm, that's significant. I'd guess it would drop to low 40s on average.



Quick Reply: Got punished by a brand new SRT8 Challenger



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.