Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Bolt-on C6 Z06 vs. World Record (9.97@137mph)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2011 | 12:22 PM
  #21  
AWDTBSS's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

We will see how fast he will go now, a place is offering him a free cam kit lol
Old 12-07-2011 | 12:47 PM
  #22  
Killemall's Avatar
Launching!

 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Default

In that kinda weather a stock viper can do 132 or a stock zr1 134. Talking stock full weight.

Pretty sure thats the same track were a stock f458 went 132 mph.

Depends on how you look at it to how impressive it really is. I give the guy props for running the number. Weight reduction or not a 9.9 at just 137 mph is really driving well. A very proud acomplishment for vette owners.

Can a viper or lambo or zr1 do it? Who cares. Rather they can or not the z06 already has. Be like russia trying t get to the moon at this point
Old 12-07-2011 | 12:50 PM
  #23  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 485
From: Winchester, VA
Default

I've been following him for a while. He also holds the record for a bolt-on ls6 et also (although I have the bolt-on ls6 mph). He does a great making these things move and has run 138mph with this one. What's funny is it took a fully built 5.0 (actually stroked to a 5.2) to run those times in a full on race car.........you readin this Stoppy?....Ohio you there??..lol After all the comparison **** I've read of 5.0 vs ls7 I just had to say it.....not really much of a comparison after all.

As a side note I have a complete rebuilt to stock ls7 for my Camaro and this makes me want to put it in.
Old 12-07-2011 | 12:50 PM
  #24  
marc97taws6's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
From: DSM
Default

Originally Posted by AWDTBSS
he has rear coilovers, but he has said he has cut 1.36 60' on stock suspension tho. he never answered back to people asking about raceweight on corvetteforum.
Shocking how well he dialed that baby in. Hell most cam-only, bolt-on C6Z guys I've seen are mid-low 10's @ 137 lol
Originally Posted by TheHitman
I guarantee you if somebody raced their Viper at the strip like that dude raced his C6 Z, it would probably match or best it.
But until the stated happens, that is all speculation
Old 12-07-2011 | 01:21 PM
  #25  
AWDTBSS's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Ya his traps are higher than a large majority of c6z in general lol
Old 12-07-2011 | 01:27 PM
  #26  
Sladester2's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: Southeast Missouri
Default

thats fast
Old 12-07-2011 | 01:38 PM
  #27  
92cobranotch's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I've been following him for a while. He also holds the record for a bolt-on ls6 et also (although I have the bolt-on ls6 mph). He does a great making these things move and has run 138mph with this one. What's funny is it took a fully built 5.0 (actually stroked to a 5.2) to run those times in a full on race car.........you readin this Stoppy?....Ohio you there??..lol After all the comparison **** I've read of 5.0 vs ls7 I just had to say it.....not really much of a comparison after all.

As a side note I have a complete rebuilt to stock ls7 for my Camaro and this makes me want to put it in.
Its gotta go 10s with the ls6 or your botom line. No ls7 until then!
Old 12-07-2011 | 02:38 PM
  #28  
Mike Morris's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,639
Likes: 68
From: Md/PA/FL
Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
Its gotta go 10s with the ls6 or your botom line. No ls7 until then!
You were suppose to steal it and throw it in the Potomac!!! You don't like side money?????????????????????

I told Hio he should have cammed that LS7 since its out of the car!!!
Old 12-07-2011 | 02:48 PM
  #29  
mypoorLS1's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Mike Morris;15704654]You were suppose to steal it and throw it in the Potomac!!!

Since you guys can't take care of this, I guess I will have to. May not throw in the river, but I'm very sure I can find a use for it. . . . . and he'll never know it was me.
Old 12-07-2011 | 02:52 PM
  #30  
Mike Morris's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,639
Likes: 68
From: Md/PA/FL
Default

Just get rid of the damn thing!!!!!!!!! Even with heads and weight reduction on my Z that car will drop kick me at half throttle with a LS7....
Old 12-07-2011 | 03:08 PM
  #31  
djfury05's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 3
From: Beaufort, SC
Default

DA Calculator says DA was -1419ft at 3:54pm.. Awesome air!!

http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...time=3:54%20PM
Old 12-07-2011 | 04:22 PM
  #32  
ohioborn80's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 214
Likes: 252
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I've been following him for a while. He also holds the record for a bolt-on ls6 et also (although I have the bolt-on ls6 mph). He does a great making these things move and has run 138mph with this one. What's funny is it took a fully built 5.0 (actually stroked to a 5.2) to run those times in a full on race car.........you readin this Stoppy?....Ohio you there??..lol After all the comparison **** I've read of 5.0 vs ls7 I just had to say it.....not really much of a comparison after all.

As a side note I have a complete rebuilt to stock ls7 for my Camaro and this makes me want to put it in.
SO you going to say it took a 5.0 stroked to a 5.2 when the Z06 is a 7.0? Really? That was just stupid. Not to mention they both was manuals. Both made over 500whp. So again how is it not a comparison? Yes teh Z06 is nicer then the mustang. But they ran the same thing and both trapped 137. So looks like the little 5.2 got the job done just fine.

Last edited by ohioborn80; 12-07-2011 at 04:57 PM.
Old 12-07-2011 | 04:23 PM
  #33  
ohioborn80's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 214
Likes: 252
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by djfury05
DA Calculator says DA was -1419ft at 3:54pm.. Awesome air!!

http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...time=3:54%20PM
That is great air. Wish we had that in TX.
Old 12-07-2011 | 07:02 PM
  #34  
assasinator's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 528
Likes: 15
From: huntsville Al
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
What's funny is it took a fully built 5.0 (actually stroked to a 5.2) to run those times in a full on race car.........you readin this Stoppy?....Ohio you there??..lol After all the comparison **** I've read of 5.0 vs ls7 I just had to say it.....not really much of a comparison after all.

As a side note I have a complete rebuilt to stock ls7 for my Camaro and this makes me want to put it in.
I DO wish you were better at baiting.

are you inferring at LS7 is NOT a fully built engine? and one with all bolt ons is not even fuller(is that a word) built? and one with possible weight reduction or at least has stock 3200lbs weight is somehow to be compared to a heavier pony car?

or that somehow a 75k vette with a load of money added to it is somehow not as 'racey' as a 5.2 liter 530+rwhp pony car?


lets see.

1. the vette is lighter vs. heavier pony car
2. the vette costs more vs. most interior pony car
3. the vette has factory cnc heads vs STAGE 2 (there is stage3)
4. the vette has SEVEN liters!!!! SEVEN!!!!!!!! vs. 5.2 liters
5. -1400 DA corrects to a 14 second 1/4 mile at 110 mph (just kidding)

you made the comparison.

i dont really care though man. i think you are wasting your money on LSx stuff. for the cash you waste on that stuff SB2.2 could make 900hp easy. turn 10k rpms. most good CUP shops will sell complete motors. and you cant touch their power.

http://www.raceprovenparts.com.au/pr...roductid=17523

Last edited by assasinator; 12-07-2011 at 07:08 PM.
Old 12-07-2011 | 07:19 PM
  #35  
WSsick's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 3
From: St. Peters, MO
Default

Throwing fuel on the fire...


That 9.9 Mustang was a tin can. Having 4 valves per cylinder and 4 cams helps the breathing process along to compensate for the lack of cubes...but I know you're just reverse-trolling assassinator.
Old 12-07-2011 | 07:49 PM
  #36  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 485
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Originally Posted by assasinator
I DO wish you were better at baiting.

are you inferring at LS7 is NOT a fully built engine? and one with all bolt ons is not even fuller(is that a word) built? and one with possible weight reduction or at least has stock 3200lbs weight is somehow to be compared to a heavier pony car?

or that somehow a 75k vette with a load of money added to it is somehow not as 'racey' as a 5.2 liter 530+rwhp pony car?


lets see.

1. the vette is lighter vs. heavier pony car
2. the vette costs more vs. most interior pony car
3. the vette has factory cnc heads vs STAGE 2 (there is stage3)
4. the vette has SEVEN liters!!!! SEVEN!!!!!!!! vs. 5.2 liters
5. -1400 DA corrects to a 14 second 1/4 mile at 110 mph (just kidding)

you made the comparison.
i dont really care though man. i think you are wasting your money on LSx stuff. for the cash you waste on that stuff SB2.2 could make 900hp easy. turn 10k rpms. most good CUP shops will sell complete motors. and you cant touch their power.

http://www.raceprovenparts.com.au/pr...roductid=17523
Yep I sure did, but I got that comparison from a ford sight. I knew there was no real comparison.

Your right, it's kinda hard to compair a fully built high compression 32v 5.0(5.2)with a faceplated trans( of coarse I had to throw that in there..lol) to a docile stock production engine......especially after hear how awesome the 5.0 is.
I could car less about old sbc/bbc ****....it don't fit my car and I'm glad that **** is gone for me.
Originally Posted by WSsick
Throwing fuel on the fire...


That 9.9 Mustang was a tin can. Having 4 valves per cylinder and 4 cams helps the breathing process along to compensate for the lack of cubes...but I know you're just reverse-trolling assassinator.
Old 12-07-2011 | 07:58 PM
  #37  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 485
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Originally Posted by mypoorLS1

Since you guys can't take care of this, I guess I will have to. May not throw in the river, but I'm very sure I can find a use for it. . . . . and he'll never know it was me.
Leave it alone.....lol
Originally Posted by Mike Morris
Just get rid of the damn thing!!!!!!!!! Even with heads and weight reduction on my Z that car will drop kick me at half throttle with a LS7....
Stop cryin....sissy pants

At this rate Mike, I don't think it needs a cam.
Old 12-07-2011 | 08:05 PM
  #38  
automach1's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: South MS
Default

Out of curiosity what is the h/c/i c6z record?
Old 12-07-2011 | 08:11 PM
  #39  
lazerlemonta's Avatar
10 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 771
Likes: 173
From: VA
Default

That's flat *** haulin the mail! Nothing like stock GM parts with some freed up power and a driver. Glad to see the old 5 slow I gotta blow to make power trend is coming back full force.
Old 12-07-2011 | 08:40 PM
  #40  
AWDTBSS's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
Out of curiosity what is the h/c/i c6z record?
9.99@139
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/1569692457-post706.html


Quick Reply: Bolt-on C6 Z06 vs. World Record (9.97@137mph)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.