Heater

Should of called it "Cam Only" instead of "Fully Built".

92cobranotch

iTrader: (9)

nah nah, didn't you read heater its bored? over bore = fully built lol

wicked383lt1

How big of a difference between aluminum vs cast iron heads on a set up like this one. Just curious.

R6cowboy

iTrader: (3)

A good set of aluminum heads on a fox 5.0L, even with the little E303 cam (220/220, .498/.498, 110lsa) can make a pretty significant different. The stock E7TE heads are absolute garbage and don't flow worth ****, approx. 160 in./110 ex. @.600 lift.

R6cowboy

iTrader: (3)

I'll give you a really good example now that I think of it. When I first bought my '89 notch foxbody with 5 speed trans back in March '00, it had 63k miles and ran great. Mods when bought were E303 cam, BBK shorty headers, MAC catless 2.5" H-pipe and MAC catback, MSD 6AL ignition, MSD 8.5 wires, BBK 70mm TB, BBK cold air intake, Centerforce clutch, timing gears and B&M Ripper shifter. With a good set of new radials it ran a best of 14.1 @ 100mph in 70* spring IL weather at Byron Dragway. My car also had the stock 2.73 gears at the time.

Point being, you will smoke your buddy's Mustang.

88blackgt

Call it retard built

Mike Morris

iTrader: (55)

With stock heads untouched with that list you will demolish him. Thats a slow fox not built by any means

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

So by being "built" you guys actually mean elimination of all ford parts so this thing can run???.....lmao

R6cowboy

iTrader: (3)

Well the Ford 8.8 differential housing in that Mustang is a decent piece. But the insides of that rearend is a different story, they're better off being recycled steel... Lol

88blackgt

really this **** again?

916 BREDWNR

You should have no problem whatsoever OP with those minimal mods. My '90 25th GT ran a best of 13.9x@99 with an E cam, Cobra upper/lower, SVO 70mm TB, 76mm MAF, AFM Power Pipe, March ram-air, SVO 24# injectors, Flowtech EQ-lnth shorties/H-pipe, ASP U/D Pulley, MSD plugs/wires, AFM chip, 3.73s, Lakewood SFC's/LCA's, BFG 275/40 Drag Radials..and I am sure there is some other little nick nacks im forgetting. This was with stock E7 heads.

R6cowboy

iTrader: (3)

Curious where were you running the car? Because that seems very slow with those mods.

1_MEANZ28

iTrader: (4)

good take off .i see you winning..reaserch youtube ...lol

916 BREDWNR

Sacramento Raceway.

And I don't consider that slow at all for those mods. That's what 95% of the cam/full bolt-on/stock heads foxes run.

They're really not that quick without a good set of heads and intake etc..

glennster

iTrader: (1)

I've had 7 of these cars, my last hatch with GT40's, small crane cam and performer intake with 3.73's,LT's and exhaust it went 13.2's at around 104 with a drag radial which of course is stock LS1 territory with less MPH. They can be suprising but yes, the stock heads/intake really suck.
BTW these cars unfortunately did to camaro back in the day like the new 5.0 does to camaros today.

Heater

When I read his post, I was like "Really, I mean really?"

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Lol....just stating the obvious.

Heater

LoL, only relevant to you.

88blackgt

Don't get into it, he's in his own world where he knows best despite what anyone else says.

Heater

Kinda funny in that last thread when he tried to make the statement that Fords needed aftermarket parts to be fast; I brought up the 351 Cleveland and the conversation ended