Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

rustang vs ls1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2012, 09:43 PM
  #161  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
That would be a opinion. Alot of ppl dd 4.30s and 4.56s just fine
even with overdrive, 4.10's are kinda high. to be honest, with todays technology, there is no reason/need to go any higher than 3.73 or 3.90. even 3.90 is a bit high.
1ltcap is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 09:43 PM
  #162  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,976
Received 478 Likes on 375 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
the new 5 liter IS the cammer.
No it's not. The cammer crate engine has been out for a long time and was only rated @ 400hp. Maybe they have updated it now, but the one I speak of has been out since before 05.
HioSSilver is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 09:47 PM
  #163  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,976
Received 478 Likes on 375 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

1lt I like my 3.90's. I had 4.10's but they never seem to really load the engine hard. I ran out of gear with the 4.10 and had to change to 3.90 to get threw the traps. The 3.90 is much better imop. I may try some 3.73's at some point.
HioSSilver is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 09:48 PM
  #164  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
even with overdrive, 4.10's are kinda high. to be honest, with todays technology, there is no reason/need to go any higher than 3.73 or 3.90. even 3.90 is a bit high.
+1 any lower is oriented towards running a number and hangin its tongue out on the back half. And cars that make 300hp or less lol
92cobranotch is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 09:50 PM
  #165  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
of course its opinion some ppl dont care about real drivability and will put up with different stuff depending on comute and how often they drive their car
see? when i was young, i was like that. i didn't give a dam that i had to put my car in neutral(auto trans) at traffic lights. i didn't give a dam that i had to deal with a stall converter, or that i had to keep her running for 10 minutes on the cold days before i could pull out of the driveway....i didn't care about any of that crap.

now? fergetabout it! i want my a/c blasting when i'm in the staging lanes. i don't turn it off for the run....no need. that's why god gave us WOT relays. i want to drive my ride to and from the track. i want to fire up and go, and have heat in the winter, and a/c in the summer. i'm not willing to give up anything to go fast anymore.
that's why i got a mustang. it's pretty much a shoe in that she'll run mid 12's all day, just as i took delivery. if i decide i'm willing to put a tune on her(by some of your guys standards, she'll still be stock), she'll drop into the 11's, and mid-low 11's with drag radials.
that of course is if i were going to drag race her. i will, but not like my 89(which saw gamblers racing tues nights, street race night on fridays, then front street after that, then brackets on saturdays....every week). i'm gonna concentrate on road racing this baby, 'cause she cuts corners like a hot knife in butter.
1ltcap is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 09:51 PM
  #166  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Had to....just to show ya to your not as perfect as you think you are.

Your right, my car would also run ALOT better down a 1/4 mile if I made it leave @ 6000+ rpm like he did. Then that puts us back to square one. ls6>5.0.
you mean crate motor>true production motor, don'tcha?
1ltcap is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 09:53 PM
  #167  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Demon 383
If someone posts another pic of an outdated foxbody Mustang or ugly *** Fairmont I don't know what I'll do. I thought I was in a time warp back in the '80s or something.


And what's all this hating on weight reduction on a F-body? No one seems to complain when you have a tin can'd Mustang running around with a little weak SBF in it running some stupid rear gear just to run a decent number. What gives?
ya knowwwwwwww.......



oops.
1ltcap is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 09:58 PM
  #168  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
So with 420rwhp you trapped 130mph in the 4th with a manual trans. Can someone do the math on what the car would have to weigh in order for this to happen? Some might know more than me but 3200lbs+130mph trap = something other than 420rwhp. Just curious..
our 68 camaro trapped at 130-131 running 10.0's into the 9.9's. that car weighed about 2600# with me in it, and a full fuel cell. it had a truck 454 at the time, with heads that i ported the crap out of. i can't remember the cam it had. that one went through the traps around 6300-6400rpm. 'cause we really had to make it work to go that fast.
1ltcap is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 10:05 PM
  #169  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,976
Received 478 Likes on 375 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
you mean crate motor>true production motor, don'tcha?
What I have is a true production engine. I bought it in 02, before they were really selling it as a crate engine. The ones they sold as "crate engines" had CTS-v oil pans. Mine had the Vette oil pan.
HioSSilver is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 10:05 PM
  #170  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
You are wrong. I have pics all over tech. Check them out. I drive my car alot. I don't see the purpose in working on it, spending money on it and then not driving it. I'm not some one with a "street legal" car, I don't even like the type of car you speak off. I'm someone with a 110,000k + dd.
well.....with that last statement, you almost got what i was/am referencing. they'll dump that stupid amount into car, and claim it's a daily driver....but in actuality.....go back to my "planet alignment" post. that's generally what they turn out to be. i've dealt with way too many people driving both fords and chevys that're like that. the funny thing is that when i come upon a mopar guy that makes those claims......they truly ARE daily driving their stuff, in pretty much any condition.

and my apology was aimed at you, since it's your car i was making those comments about.
1ltcap is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 10:11 PM
  #171  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
+1 any lower is oriented towards running a number and hangin its tongue out on the back half. And cars that make 300hp or less lol
geeez
automach1 is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 10:12 PM
  #172  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
even with overdrive, 4.10's are kinda high. to be honest, with todays technology, there is no reason/need to go any higher than 3.73 or 3.90. even 3.90 is a bit high.
ok you do that I will stick with my 4.30s
automach1 is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 10:25 PM
  #173  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,976
Received 478 Likes on 375 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Originally Posted by 1ltcap
well.....with that last statement, you almost got what i was/am referencing. they'll dump that stupid amount into car, and claim it's a daily driver....but in actuality.....go back to my "planet alignment" post. that's generally what they turn out to be. i've dealt with way too many people driving both fords and chevys that're like that. the funny thing is that when i come upon a mopar guy that makes those claims......they truly ARE daily driving their stuff, in pretty much any condition.

and my apology was aimed at you, since it's your car i was making those comments about.
Thanks. I'm like you, my ac blows cold, I set my cc on the highway and rock out to all 6 speakers. There is a method to my madness....lol
HioSSilver is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 10:31 PM
  #174  
TECH Resident
 
1ltcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

now that you mentioned speakers.....THAT is one complaint i could raise about my gt. the stereo in it isn't as good as the infinity that came in my 97 dakota. i don't generally bitch about it though, 'cause it's still pretty good. and it doesn't make the car any less fun to drive.
1ltcap is offline  



Quick Reply: rustang vs ls1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 AM.