Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

V6 Camaro beats 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2012, 11:28 PM
  #21  
registered user
iTrader: (3)
 
ScreaminRedZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,940
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 88blackiroc
.....why? Haha
Serious, at least go with the 350!
Something to do with the warrantee. He got a better one if he stuck with the same motor or something.
Old 04-04-2012, 12:01 AM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,604
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

85 Mustang GTs were pretty respectable back in the day. Lets not mention what it could do to any 85 Camaro that year...
Old 04-04-2012, 06:36 AM
  #23  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
 
NightmareTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Liberal land
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ScreaminRedZ
When the TBI 305 in my dad's old Formula went, he replaced it with a crate 305. Nothing like swapping out a useless hunk of turd for a brand new useless hunk of turd
LOL....gotta keep it original! It'll be worth more that way.

Originally Posted by Mike Morris
85 Mustang GTs were pretty respectable back in the day. Lets not mention what it could do to any 85 Camaro that year...
Stang would lose, lol...

85 was the worst year for putting a mustang against a camaro. stangs were still carbed while 85 was the first year for the TPI in the camaro. The 85 305 TPI was the "freak" year since it had a larger factory cam than any other year so they made 10-15 more HP than later years on average. Gotta compare top dog to top dog...none of this FI 5.0 vs carbed or TBI 305 nonsense!
Old 04-04-2012, 07:26 AM
  #24  
On The Tree
 
zz4camaro1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 176
Received 71 Likes on 52 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Morris
85 Mustang GTs were pretty respectable back in the day. Lets not mention what it could do to any 85 Camaro that year...
LOL, carbd 85 Camaro was my first car. I think it was rated at 155hp and 245ftlbs. The valves would float at ~5000rpm and I still can remember thinking how cool I thought it was that I could do a whole 20ft one wheelie peelie. It handled well though.
Old 04-04-2012, 07:37 AM
  #25  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Morris
85 Mustang GTs were pretty respectable back in the day. Lets not mention what it could do to any 85 Camaro that year...
I wouldn't say any Mike. We waxed waxed a few in my ol'mans 85 Iroc......modded ones to.

No surprises in this vid. I keep tellin you guys those old 5.slows weren't that fast w/o mods.

Nightmare ....85 tpi cars actually had 20HP more than the 86's.
Old 04-04-2012, 10:32 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,604
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

I meant to say carbed Camaros my bad
The 85 TPI carrs which could only be had in automatics were top dog. When they added the peanut cam in 86 is when it go ugly...
Old 04-04-2012, 06:50 PM
  #27  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
 
NightmareTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Liberal land
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I wouldn't say any Mike. We waxed waxed a few in my ol'mans 85 Iroc......modded ones to.

No surprises in this vid. I keep tellin you guys those old 5.slows weren't that fast w/o mods.

Nightmare ....85 tpi cars actually had 20HP more than the 86's.
Originally Posted by Mike Morris
I meant to say carbed Camaros my bad
The 85 TPI carrs which could only be had in automatics were top dog. When they added the peanut cam in 86 is when it go ugly...
Yep...and guess what 305 I had (hint in sig ). I know the **** 86 305 VERY well. Got spanked by a bone stock early 90's grand prix GT when I was stock. LOL, only had the stock cam for about a year though till I put in a bigger one. Car woke up BIG time after that.

For some reason, everyone and thier mother thinks foxbody 5.0's were out of the league of a 3rd gen. Any 305 TPI/5 speed or 350 TPI car would be a drivers race for a 5.0. 350 TPI's could run 13's with a few bolt ons and a good tire.
Old 04-04-2012, 09:54 PM
  #28  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Back when I first started roadracing it was the tpi cars vs the fox 5.0. On a road course the tpi cars flat owned the foxes...... I can't really stress how bad it was. It's a shame so many only want to look at 1 aspect of performance. I would love to do a race from 100-0.....or 0-100-0. Getting a car to to only go a 1/4 all out is pretty easy if that's your only goal.
Old 04-04-2012, 10:02 PM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ScottyBG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bowling Green KY
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

This thread reminds me of sailboat racing, whats next turtles or snails? 305s, v6s, hehe
Old 04-04-2012, 10:03 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
WhiteKnight '01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It only took 25 years for a V6 to become more powerful than a V8 Mustang, good job.
Old 04-04-2012, 11:22 PM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,604
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

I have had a 350TPI and a Fox body both stock. My TPI was faster stock. A dual car 305 TPI with 342s was a damn good race for 5.0s Foxs sans a 87-88 coupe 5 speed/93 Cobra.
When it came time to mod the Mustang was superior however.
Old 04-04-2012, 11:41 PM
  #32  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
1_MEANZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice killll..those new v6 are quite impressive
Old 04-04-2012, 11:44 PM
  #33  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WhiteKnight '01
It only took 25 years for a V6 to become more powerful than a V8 Mustang, good job.
That didn't make much sense...
Old 04-05-2012, 01:06 AM
  #34  
Staging Lane
 
41863nj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the '85 tpi 305 was rated at 215 hp in the camaro & 205 in the firebird...yes the '86's sucked big time , what with the third brake light sitting on top of the hatch and losing between 10-15 hp. in '85 you could only get a tpi with an auto. want a 5-speed ???...fine then you would get the 5.0 H.O. with either trans...basically the '85 tpi was a L-69 H.O with tpi...certainly got rid of the vapor lock that the H.O.'s were saddled with...there was a bigger difference between the auto. 305 and the manuel 305 engine wise...the runners were different and the manuel had a much better cam, better gears...the 5.7 which de-buted in '87 f-bodies was a 350 but just not the same 350 in the 'vette...different heads, runners were from the 305, cam...basically only the block was from the 'vette's..

i guess i'm old as i found out all this crap the hard way, see i bought all these cars i mentioned and found out how GM lied about it being the ''thee'' corvette engine...i also owned a '85 mustang gt 5-speed with the optional 3.08 gears...i never lost to any stock '84-'86 camaro or firebird...NIGHTMARE TA you're so right about the tbi 305's...man what a dog...170hp ..i sold cars for years and pontiac's and chevys and drove the tpi, great handling, but that was it....could not even spin the tires.
Old 04-05-2012, 09:16 AM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,604
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Actually the runners were the same on 305s and 350TPIs. The injectors were different however.
I "think" the 350 L98s from Vettes were 4 bolt blocks and the Fbodies were not-I could be wrong on that.
Some 350TPI cars were dogs too. Single cat 87-88s with 277 gears were terrible!!
Old 04-05-2012, 05:30 PM
  #36  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
 
NightmareTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Liberal land
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ScottyBG
This thread reminds me of sailboat racing, whats next turtles or snails? 305s, v6s, hehe
Hey, they may be slow now a day, but back then thats all people had. Kind of cool to learn about what combos were "hot" or considered "fast" back then...like the G92 305 5 speed cars. I'd love to get my hands on a nice one.

Originally Posted by Mike Morris
Actually the runners were the same on 305s and 350TPIs. The injectors were different however.
I "think" the 350 L98s from Vettes were 4 bolt blocks and the Fbodies were not-I could be wrong on that.
Some 350TPI cars were dogs too. Single cat 87-88s with 277 gears were terrible!!
Yep, runners were all the same. 305 had 19 lbs injectors, 350 had 22 or 24 lb(not sure which one). Not sure on the mains either...vettes most likely had 4 bolts, but it wouldn't surprise me if GM used 2 and 4 bolt blocks in the F bodies. They seem pretty inconsistent with things like that sometimes.
Old 04-06-2012, 04:24 PM
  #37  
Staging Lane
 
41863nj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

let me correct myself here...the TBI couldn't spin the tires, the tpi could...and working with all the GM tech's i was told that the runners were different, and that the 350's had gotten the runners from the 305, not the corvette 350...sorry if this doesn't sound correct to you guys, but facts are facts...both my '87 & '91 formula 350's had the WS-6 suspension and 3.27 gears...not 3.23...i still have the invoice's somewhere...and when we took apart the engines is when we found out the many differences between the f-bodies and the 'vette...

my '87 had a open exhaust, no cat (gutted) 160* stat hypertech stage 3 chip, cai and computer tuning done as well...and lots of free stuff...ran a 'vette same year...dead even both cars with passengers...so much for my car having the real vette engine...and yes both my cars had 2 bolt mains...sadly....and MIKE MORRIS you're right, some tpi's were dogs, but my '91 was very stout.
Old 04-06-2012, 04:54 PM
  #38  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

I actually called about a 91 z28 5m yesterday. It had the tb motor in it so I passed. This is the reason the IROC/Z28's looked bad. Alot of them were produced with tb motors.
Old 04-06-2012, 05:15 PM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,604
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 41863nj
let me correct myself here...the TBI couldn't spin the tires, the tpi could...and working with all the GM tech's i was told that the runners were different, and that the 350's had gotten the runners from the 305, not the corvette 350...sorry if this doesn't sound correct to you guys, but facts are facts...both my '87 & '91 formula 350's had the WS-6 suspension and 3.27 gears...not 3.23...i still have the invoice's somewhere...and when we took apart the engines is when we found out the many differences between the f-bodies and the 'vette...

my '87 had a open exhaust, no cat (gutted) 160* stat hypertech stage 3 chip, cai and computer tuning done as well...and lots of free stuff...ran a 'vette same year...dead even both cars with passengers...so much for my car having the real vette engine...and yes both my cars had 2 bolt mains...sadly....and MIKE MORRIS you're right, some tpi's were dogs, but my '91 was very stout.


Your facts concerning the runners are dead wrong. They are the same. Differences were in the years-some had cold start injector. Most Fbody runners got dinged up during install of the engine in the car. The Vettes didn't.

91 TPIs non automatic 305s were decent for the day.
Old 04-07-2012, 11:05 AM
  #40  
On The Tree
iTrader: (23)
 
Blown383LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 108
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

304 horsepower vs 180 horsepower (when new 27 years ago). It should have been a lot worse. Back around 92 I would sometimes use my moms 90 Grand Prix to drive to college. A buddy of mine had a 91 IROC with a 305 tbi. We would race almost every time I drove it. We would go from a high roll and I would pull him everytime. The GP had a 3.1 v6 and I had a passenger.


Quick Reply: V6 Camaro beats 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM.