Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Challenger SRT8 6.4L vs. wife's Pontiac G8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2012, 02:09 PM
  #21  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

I want a sammich too....someone make me a sammich in between those shifts......



Good comparison. With proper shifting/trans fixed the 392 would have it covered.
Old 05-28-2012, 02:12 PM
  #22  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marc97taws6
Impressive that a light bolt-on G8 fared that well. I was expecting the Challenger to put up a much better fight
it didnt put up a good fight because it was driven like ****. A 392 should kill a G8 with those mods. My 6.1 does
Old 05-28-2012, 02:15 PM
  #23  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LT/LS Guy
You're not kidding. I ran a stock 6.1 SRT-8 Challenger and it was devistating.

I still haven't got a chance to run a 392. Every time one comes around its a rookie who just got it so I don't even bother.
Old 05-28-2012, 02:26 PM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
flintwrench69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mt Morris, Michigan
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
Did them and Ford share manaul trans or something.
Its got the same trans that the camaro SS got the TR6060.

Originally Posted by big hammer
those 392's are a major improvement over the sluggish 6.1's
It might be an improvement but I wouldnt consider the 6.1 Hemi sluggish at all. You must be thinking of the 2.7.
Old 05-28-2012, 02:36 PM
  #25  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
RabidStreetRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Nice runs, I like the G8's.
Never been a fan of the HEMI's. Then I took my truck to a performance shop to look at something and he was tuning like a 2008 300 SRT8. I saw it had a custom sheet metal manifold and just had to ask about it. It dyno'd to the wheels around 1077rwhp and ran low 10's with full interior. It had twin turbo's of course. I became a fan after that. Had over $100,000 invested though, I didn't care for that.
Old 05-28-2012, 02:54 PM
  #26  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hugger1975
Why87.....will u be sharing any of those sammiches?
Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I want a sammich too....someone make me a sammich in between those shifts......



Good comparison. With proper shifting/trans fixed the 392 would have it covered.
Sure, what would you like? Ruben, BLT, PB&j?

Originally Posted by flintwrench69
Its got the same trans that the camaro SS got the TR6060.



It might be an improvement but I wouldnt consider the 6.1 Hemi sluggish at all. You must be thinking of the 2.7.
Agreed, the old 6.1s were and still are stout motors. Hell, they make more power than a comparable ls2 stock with damn near same displacement. Just the fact they were shoved in between the fenders of a land yacht kept them from doing as well as they should.
Old 05-28-2012, 03:19 PM
  #27  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
LS1rob00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Nice! Fix that trans and re-race!
Old 05-28-2012, 03:42 PM
  #28  
Launching!
 
kciaccio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pearland TX
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yikes! Stay away from the GXP G8. It will eat your lunch by the looks of it.
Old 05-28-2012, 06:46 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
 
Demon 383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OP, tell your wife to trade in that junk 6M Challenger for an automatic version. They're actually faster than the manual by a good margin.
Old 05-28-2012, 07:41 PM
  #30  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kciaccio
Yikes! Stay away from the GXP G8. It will eat your lunch by the looks of it.
No.

Intake/Tune GXP vs Stock Auto 392
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_u-F-c7j_U
Old 05-28-2012, 07:45 PM
  #31  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Demon 383
OP, tell your wife to trade in that junk 6M Challenger for an automatic version. They're actually faster than the manual by a good margin.
Exactly the 3rd pedal wasn't made for everyone..
Old 05-28-2012, 08:38 PM
  #32  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
No.

Intake/Tune GXP vs Stock Auto 392
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_u-F-c7j_U
Exactly!! One youtube race determines outcome of all others.
Old 05-28-2012, 08:56 PM
  #33  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by why87
Exactly!! One youtube race determines outcome of all others.
No but a G8 GXP isnt capable of low 12's stock like a 392. Clear winner. A Stock G8 GXP and a 6.1 SRT8 are a drivers race.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWDaNgs-Ab4

Last edited by NiteRiderWS6; 05-28-2012 at 09:12 PM.
Old 05-28-2012, 09:12 PM
  #34  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
No but a G8 GXP isnt capable of low 12's stock like a 392. Clear winner. A Stock G8 GXP and a 6.1 SRT8 are a drivers race.
But if a decent driven GXP ran into a 392 with a less than desireable driver like the one in the vid, wouldn't it be possible for the 392 to get beat? Especially intake/tune? Yes.
Old 05-28-2012, 09:31 PM
  #35  
12 Second Club
 
willys srt8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by why87
But if a decent driven GXP ran into a 392 with a less than desireable driver like the one in the vid, wouldn't it be possible for the 392 to get beat? Especially intake/tune? Yes.
Yes because anything can happen on the streets. But, are you comparing the capabiliteis of the cars or the drivers?
Old 05-28-2012, 09:35 PM
  #36  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by why87
But if a decent driven GXP ran into a 392 with a less than desireable driver like the one in the vid, wouldn't it be possible for the 392 to get beat? Especially intake/tune? Yes.
Of course. Most 6m 392 guys will lose to slower cars everytime
Old 05-28-2012, 09:45 PM
  #37  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ****** srt8
Yes because anything can happen on the streets. But, are you comparing the capabiliteis of the cars or the drivers?
I'm comparing the two with the combination of car/driver. Slower car/better driver=win/dead even. Faster car/lesser driver=dead even loss. G8/better driver vs. 392/**** driver....what do you think would happen? The car isn't fast enough to make up for the poor driving.
Old 05-28-2012, 09:45 PM
  #38  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
Of course. Most 6m 392 guys will lose to slower cars everytime
Most? So which is the slower car at that point?
Old 05-28-2012, 09:57 PM
  #39  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
O-FiveCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any car with a bad driver can get beat by a slower car, I can't believe this is even arguable. A 392 Chally went 12.0 with just a tire. The G8 GXP has slightly less HP then the LS3 Camaro. The 392 will kill the LS3 Camaro, and will kill the G8 GXP the same. IMO, the GXP is in line with the GTO stock for stock, a handful more rwhp, but 300 lbs heavier. No comparison to the 392 vs any NA OEM ls3 on the market right now with equal driver's


Edit: Forgot the Corvette....that's a different story

Last edited by O-FiveCC; 05-28-2012 at 10:04 PM.
Old 05-28-2012, 10:01 PM
  #40  
Staging Lane
 
GotHemi?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

All things being equal the 392 is the faster car period. You could put me in a Geo Metro and my mom in a C6Z and id bust her *** everytime. Why compare drivers? technically every race is a "drivers race" no matter what two cars are racing.

I will say this tho. Any way you slice it that G8 moved out well!! Good kill!


Quick Reply: Challenger SRT8 6.4L vs. wife's Pontiac G8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.