Stroker 2jz 1200hp supra vs Turbo k-series Honda
07-30-2012, 03:52 PM
#61
Teching In
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Socal/LA/OC
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol.
Down here we got a couple s2k guys running around who think they are fastest cars on earth. I remember this one guy who wanted to race my, at the time, cammed L99 with his stock s2k. He was **** talking me up and down about how he was going to beat me. I even told him, let's do it away from everyone so I don't embarrass you. Well he wasn't having it. I think I got him by about 10 bus lengths... He never showed up again in the s2k but would come in his 4x4 toyota lol.
Down here we got a couple s2k guys running around who think they are fastest cars on earth. I remember this one guy who wanted to race my, at the time, cammed L99 with his stock s2k. He was **** talking me up and down about how he was going to beat me. I even told him, let's do it away from everyone so I don't embarrass you. Well he wasn't having it. I think I got him by about 10 bus lengths... He never showed up again in the s2k but would come in his 4x4 toyota lol.
HA! I can imagine...A lot of people think the S is fast until they get smoked. They are somewhat quick, but it doesn't take much to put one in it's place that's for sure. They are really fast or really slow (in most variations). Hey, but they do FEEL fast lol.
Last edited by BBAP2; 07-30-2012 at 06:24 PM.
07-30-2012, 04:44 PM
#64
Needs a power adder to be able to do anything. Sadly civics can be fast on motor, nitrous, or boost same goes for LSx cars. Any car has potential to be fast with a turbo. The 2jz is a nice motor, i just don't like most of the owners, think its the end all be all engine.
Nix
07-30-2012, 04:55 PM
#65
BBAP2, 22ssarme is a troll with a camaro with tinted tails and a sick bodykit bro. His car is an asian brand away from being featured in the next fast and the furious.
Had to google it to see what the hell it was lol. There's a difference between hate and not being a fan of something. I HATE mk4 owners, the typical ones. But how can you HATE a motor capable of producing the power its producing (2jz)? IF this LC2 makes power hey toast to it.
The one i pretty much destroyed when i was SLP lid only, was door to door with a full bolt on HR 350z that ran a 12.9 at 104. Its a nice fun car but not a fan of 2 seaters. But they ARE very unpredictable rwd cars, they are very hard to recover when getting sideways, idk why.
Had to google it to see what the hell it was lol. There's a difference between hate and not being a fan of something. I HATE mk4 owners, the typical ones. But how can you HATE a motor capable of producing the power its producing (2jz)? IF this LC2 makes power hey toast to it.
The one i pretty much destroyed when i was SLP lid only, was door to door with a full bolt on HR 350z that ran a 12.9 at 104. Its a nice fun car but not a fan of 2 seaters. But they ARE very unpredictable rwd cars, they are very hard to recover when getting sideways, idk why.
07-30-2012, 05:04 PM
#66
The ONLY reason a NA honda will ever be fast is because of the <2000 lb weight. No one cares to try to make a supra weigh that much cause its pretty easy on one of those to just make 700whp. Not everyone wants to swiss cheese thier cars and remove not related to accelerating in a straight line to go fast. A fast NA honda HAS to do that. But when a few people do that to a LS or whatever platform, the results are much more spectacular.
Edit: Also, who gives a hoot about what a supra can do NA? It comes with a turbo. (I know there are NA ones but were not even referring to those) If a honda came with a turbo, would take it off and go NA? No...thats because its stupid and doesn't make any sense.
Edit: Also, who gives a hoot about what a supra can do NA? It comes with a turbo. (I know there are NA ones but were not even referring to those) If a honda came with a turbo, would take it off and go NA? No...thats because its stupid and doesn't make any sense.
07-30-2012, 05:15 PM
#67
The ONLY reason a NA honda will ever be fast is because of the <2000 lb weight. No one cares to try to make a supra weigh that much cause its pretty easy on one of those to just make 700whp. Not everyone wants to swiss cheese thier cars and remove not related to accelerating in a straight line to go fast. A fast NA honda HAS to do that. But when a few people do that to a LS or whatever platform, the results are much more spectacular.
Edit: Also, who gives a hoot about what a supra can do NA? It comes with a turbo. (I know there are NA ones but were not even referring to those) If a honda came with a turbo, would take it off and go NA? No...thats because its stupid and doesn't make any sense.
Edit: Also, who gives a hoot about what a supra can do NA? It comes with a turbo. (I know there are NA ones but were not even referring to those) If a honda came with a turbo, would take it off and go NA? No...thats because its stupid and doesn't make any sense.
Your argument is invalid, you don't know **** about hondas. AGAIN. (jesus christ for the 2300th time) My buddy ran 11.3 at 118.8 in a full interior full trim civic EK (heavy) ON MOTOR. LMK when your cam only GTO traps anywhere near that, hell LMK when it E/T's anything worth bragging about. Please shut the **** up already. Even worse, my buddies making 285, in a full interior/full trim EG coupe with A/C and all, power windows/power sunroof/power mirrors/power everything, his car ran 7.5s on motor at the 1/8th. His setup was stock sleeve (std bore),stock rods, stock crank, stock head port, stock tranny/gearing, off the shelf cams, bolt ons, small *** swap header, and full 3 inch exhaust. Full ******* street car, like i said before lmk when your weight reducted, cam only, full bolt on, 6.0l GTO runs a 7 anything at the 8th. Again, please shut the **** up.
Whats more spectacular that your cam only full bolt on weight reducted GTO will get dragged by a full interior all motor 4cyl or your forearm tat?
Last edited by adamantium; 07-30-2012 at 06:18 PM.
kid I kid.
07-30-2012, 08:53 PM
#73
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chattanooga, tn
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-30-2012, 09:32 PM
#75
07-30-2012, 09:37 PM
#76
Had to google it to see what the hell it was lol. There's a difference between hate and not being a fan of something. I HATE mk4 owners, the typical ones. But how can you HATE a motor capable of producing the power its producing (2jz)? IF this LC2 makes power hey toast to it.
.First of all gotta give you props on that sick japenesse forearm tat bro.
Your argument is invalid, you don't know **** about hondas. AGAIN. (jesus christ for the 2300th time) My buddy ran 11.3 at 118.8 in a full interior full trim civic EK (heavy) ON MOTOR. LMK when your cam only GTO traps anywhere near that, hell LMK when it E/T's anything worth bragging about. Please shut the **** up already. Even worse, my buddies making 285, in a full interior/full trim EG coupe with A/C and all, power windows/power sunroof/power mirrors/power everything, his car ran 7.5s on motor at the 1/8th. His setup was stock sleeve (std bore),stock rods, stock crank, stock head port, stock tranny/gearing, off the shelf cams, bolt ons, small *** swap header, and full 3 inch exhaust. Full ******* street car, like i said before lmk when your weight reducted, cam only, full bolt on, 6.0l GTO runs a 7 anything at the 8th. Again, please shut the **** up.
Whats more spectacular that your cam only full bolt on weight reducted GTO will get dragged by a full interior all motor 4cyl or your forearm tat?
Your argument is invalid, you don't know **** about hondas. AGAIN. (jesus christ for the 2300th time) My buddy ran 11.3 at 118.8 in a full interior full trim civic EK (heavy) ON MOTOR. LMK when your cam only GTO traps anywhere near that, hell LMK when it E/T's anything worth bragging about. Please shut the **** up already. Even worse, my buddies making 285, in a full interior/full trim EG coupe with A/C and all, power windows/power sunroof/power mirrors/power everything, his car ran 7.5s on motor at the 1/8th. His setup was stock sleeve (std bore),stock rods, stock crank, stock head port, stock tranny/gearing, off the shelf cams, bolt ons, small *** swap header, and full 3 inch exhaust. Full ******* street car, like i said before lmk when your weight reducted, cam only, full bolt on, 6.0l GTO runs a 7 anything at the 8th. Again, please shut the **** up.
Whats more spectacular that your cam only full bolt on weight reducted GTO will get dragged by a full interior all motor 4cyl or your forearm tat?
The fastest I have ever been in my car is 142. NO ******* WAY. Haha. I'm pretty sure I had no control over the front wheels at those speeds!
07-30-2012, 09:38 PM
#77
07-30-2012, 10:36 PM
#78
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll be in MA in two weeks lol....there are a decent number of fast cars there, a couple of my buddies actually have faster cars than me, but in NC there's very few that iv seen. Nothing comparable to a mid 9 civic or high 8 drag camaro anyway(that iv seen).
07-30-2012, 10:39 PM
#79
TECH Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol, not a lot of people do know what it is. If it helps you out, the LC2 came in the Buick Grand Nationals, T-Types, GNX, and TTA. Single turbo 3.8L V6. These cars will make power pretty easily. 10.9 on the stock short-block if set up correctly. My car SHOULD run mid-low 11's with about 2k in performance, and another 2k in suspension and trans. VERY torquey cars .
My car weighs about 3800lbs. Will run right along side that car. Full A/C, power seats, power windows, radio, stock steel wheels, and full interior. I am willing to bet this is WAY more comfortable than the Civic. Not bragging or anything, I am just not fully impressed
The fastest I have ever been in my car is 142. NO ******* WAY. Haha. I'm pretty sure I had no control over the front wheels at those speeds!
.My car weighs about 3800lbs. Will run right along side that car. Full A/C, power seats, power windows, radio, stock steel wheels, and full interior. I am willing to bet this is WAY more comfortable than the Civic. Not bragging or anything, I am just not fully impressed
The fastest I have ever been in my car is 142. NO ******* WAY. Haha. I'm pretty sure I had no control over the front wheels at those speeds!
07-30-2012, 10:40 PM
#80
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Problems yes
1.stop trying to prove Hondas are the ****
2. Honda looks like ****
3.all Hondas are are gay
4.dosent matter if that gay *** Honda or any Honda beats the fasters car in the world gues what at the end of the day it's still a gay *** looking Honda .
The list goes on , I'll let other members continue with the list
1.stop trying to prove Hondas are the ****
2. Honda looks like ****
3.all Hondas are are gay
4.dosent matter if that gay *** Honda or any Honda beats the fasters car in the world gues what at the end of the day it's still a gay *** looking Honda .
The list goes on , I'll let other members continue with the list
