Intake/longtube LS2 GTO vs built motor/cammed/bolt on 99 cobra
08-05-2012, 11:41 PM
#42
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Liberal land
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you know who has a T56 I can "borrow" then it would be on the road. My wonderful "rebuilt" T56 that I bought on here was not so rebuilt and grenaded on the 2nd drive. Now I'm having it built with a level 2 upgrade kit as well as a viper main shaft and input shaft. Should never blow up again, but it is a HUGE inconvenience, and has been very costly (have about $1100 in parts going into it). With that said, it should be done in another week or so and the car will be on the road. Just a huge headache, and it sucks since the car is basically roadworthy and then this happened!
Really your car runs that bad?
08-06-2012, 12:34 AM
#46
lol Why cars not running on point? Im just going by what i hear, to be honest from what i keep hearing on here from mach 1 owners is that it is common for them to trap over 110 with bolt ons. looks more like your car is a 106-108ish mph car with bolt ons then, am i correct?
08-06-2012, 03:38 AM
#47
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you know who has a T56 I can "borrow" then it would be on the road. My wonderful "rebuilt" T56 that I bought on here was not so rebuilt and grenaded on the 2nd drive. Now I'm having it built with a level 2 upgrade kit as well as a viper main shaft and input shaft. Should never blow up again, but it is a HUGE inconvenience, and has been very costly (have about $1100 in parts going into it). With that said, it should be done in another week or so and the car will be on the road. Just a huge headache, and it sucks since the car is basically roadworthy and then this happened!
08-06-2012, 06:50 AM
#48
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pa
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol Why cars not running on point? Im just going by what i hear, to be honest from what i keep hearing on here from mach 1 owners is that it is common for them to trap over 110 with bolt ons. looks more like your car is a 106-108ish mph car with bolt ons then, am i correct?
When it comes to roll races, I don't see a big enough difference in cars trapping107 and 115 it should be a driver's race at that point. Also as far a weight reduction goes, I don't see how 100 or 200lbs will make a significant difference unless you're at the track with a 10sec race car.
Just my .02 carry on gentleman
08-06-2012, 09:05 AM
#50
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-06-2012, 09:09 AM
#51
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Liberal land
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When it comes to roll races, I don't see a big enough difference in cars trapping107 and 115 it should be a driver's race at that point. Also as far a weight reduction goes, I don't see how 100 or 200lbs will make a significant difference unless you're at the track with a 10sec race car.
Just my .02 carry on gentleman
Just my .02 carry on gentleman
08-06-2012, 09:38 AM
#53
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-06-2012, 11:45 AM
#54
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Yes sir you are correct, the last track outing netted 13.1 at 107, with exhaust and 3.73s, on a side note that was my 2nd time at the track and I need some serious driver training, my 60ft was 2.13 lol. With my recent additions I'm hoping for high 12s n/a and high 11s on n2o.
When it comes to roll races, I don't see a big enough difference in cars trapping107 and 115 it should be a driver's race at that point. Also as far a weight reduction goes, I don't see how 100 or 200lbs will make a significant difference unless you're at the track with a 10sec race car.
Just my .02 carry on gentleman
When it comes to roll races, I don't see a big enough difference in cars trapping107 and 115 it should be a driver's race at that point. Also as far a weight reduction goes, I don't see how 100 or 200lbs will make a significant difference unless you're at the track with a 10sec race car.
Just my .02 carry on gentleman
with out the 100 shot it's a 109 car +/-
08-06-2012, 12:06 PM
#57
Yes sir you are correct, the last track outing netted 13.1 at 107, with exhaust and 3.73s, on a side note that was my 2nd time at the track and I need some serious driver training, my 60ft was 2.13 lol. With my recent additions I'm hoping for high 12s n/a and high 11s on n2o.
When it comes to roll races, I don't see a big enough difference in cars trapping107 and 115 it should be a driver's race at that point. Also as far a weight reduction goes, I don't see how 100 or 200lbs will make a significant difference unless you're at the track with a 10sec race car.
Just my .02 carry on gentleman
When it comes to roll races, I don't see a big enough difference in cars trapping107 and 115 it should be a driver's race at that point. Also as far a weight reduction goes, I don't see how 100 or 200lbs will make a significant difference unless you're at the track with a 10sec race car.
Just my .02 carry on gentleman
