2v + more boost = puppy kicked Cobalt SS/TC
09-17-2012, 02:20 PM
#82
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm, and I was just commenting in another thread how it's funny no one gives these ponies any credit. Because we all know they're all stock, always...
. Lol. Nice run
. Lol. Nice run
09-17-2012, 02:23 PM
#83
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That would be pretty awesome. For a '96-'98 GT I'd rather do a ninja PI ported-head/cams build since people think they are so slow. But the next S2000 I get, I'm gonna run the stock engine till it's beyond saving, and then LSx swap it.
Yeah ok...
09-17-2012, 04:37 PM
#89
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-17-2012, 04:40 PM
#91
Teching In
Lol good comeback I guess? What is so special about an S2000? I know there is nothing special about a 2v, so don't ask that question. I've beat my friends full exhaust/intake S2gay when all he did was talk **** about how I should get a "real" car and how his car would walk me. Can they look good? Yes. Would I drive one? No.
I'd rather do an lsx swap '86 Dodge Aries 
. 
09-17-2012, 04:47 PM
#97
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've owned both cars. From a dead stop with a competent driver in both, the Mustang had a very slight edge in the 1/4 mile. From a roll, it was a dead heat. The Mustang had bolt-ons, the S2000 was bone stock.
09-17-2012, 04:48 PM
#98
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts