402/200 Shot GTO vs Cam Only C6 Z06.....
#24
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
z06's are just so nasty lol... i would think trapping 136 the gto is making upper 600's so not bad for an avg 408..though no idea what parts are on that one. not every 408 makes 550 rwhp+. doesnt sound to abnormal... and 136mph in a 4000+ plus car shows some power. z06 is probably close to 1000 pounds lighter. thats signifcant being down only 100 horsepower. but then again that z06 walked a 136mph when the z06 at 570 rwhp probably is in the high 130's trap so maybe the gto didnt bring the a game who knows.
#26
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
z06's are just so nasty lol... i would think trapping 136 the gto is making upper 600's so not bad for an avg 408..though no idea what parts are on that one. not every 408 makes 550 rwhp+. doesnt sound to abnormal... and 136mph in a 4000+ plus car shows some power. z06 is probably close to 1000 pounds lighter. thats signifcant being down only 100 horsepower. but then again that z06 walked a 136mph when the z06 at 570 rwhp probably is in the high 130's trap so maybe the gto didnt bring the a game who knows.
Also, 6xx rwhp is a wide margin until more info is available.
#33
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This. I'm under the firm impression that some people in here would find a reason to complain if they won the lottery