H/c Ta vs bolt on 5.0 and C6
#64
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yup, no room to talk he only ran 10.9@124.8 lol. And from a 60 I pulled a car.
There's a difference between bench racing and just making dumb statements like u did.
There's a difference between bench racing and just making dumb statements like u did.
#68
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm talking about this dumb statement. Saying ANY was retarded
#69
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
why? are you not confident that your z would run with other c6z with the same mods? I didn't say I would beat ANY, I said I would run with them. My whole point is that my car runs very well for the mods, period. I lost to a faster car, which btw ran door to door with lilmillers h/c ls2....lol
#70
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My buddies AFR205/LG cam, full bolt on, 4.10 geared car trapped 124-125 consistantly without raping it down the track at full weight.
#72
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And you have trapped 121? If so id say thats pretty good for its mods. Theres lots of room for gains though with more parts. For your mods it runs good, but there will be stronger H/C ls1s out there.
My buddies AFR205/LG cam, full bolt on, 4.10 geared car trapped 124-125 consistantly without raping it down the track at full weight.
My buddies AFR205/LG cam, full bolt on, 4.10 geared car trapped 124-125 consistantly without raping it down the track at full weight.
#73
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And you have trapped 121? If so id say thats pretty good for its mods. Theres lots of room for gains though with more parts. For your mods it runs good, but there will be stronger H/C ls1s out there.
My buddies AFR205/LG cam, full bolt on, 4.10 geared car trapped 124-125 consistantly without raping it down the track at full weight.
My buddies AFR205/LG cam, full bolt on, 4.10 geared car trapped 124-125 consistantly without raping it down the track at full weight.
#74
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Maybe one day people will understand no 2 cars are the same. No 2 dynos are the same. You cant say any full bolt on 5.0 will beat any full bolt on h/c ls1...and vise versa... you wanna know who wins the race in the end?
The guy with more money. Theres always something you can do to make a car faster. The term full bolt on is shady in itself... cars are never full bolt on because theres always something you can do to it to make it faster. I know of h/c ls1s that struggle to trap 115. I know of h/c ls1 that trap 130.
No matter how you swing it, the cars in the video are decent running. The 5.0 edged out the TA motor to motor, and the h/c ls2 vette edged out the 5.0 motor to motor. To me... theres nothing wrong with any of the cars. The sooner people realize 5.0s can trap into the 120s with bolt ons, the sooner they will see the light in most races. Hell mine might go into the 120s with ricer mods. That is all
The guy with more money. Theres always something you can do to make a car faster. The term full bolt on is shady in itself... cars are never full bolt on because theres always something you can do to it to make it faster. I know of h/c ls1s that struggle to trap 115. I know of h/c ls1 that trap 130.
No matter how you swing it, the cars in the video are decent running. The 5.0 edged out the TA motor to motor, and the h/c ls2 vette edged out the 5.0 motor to motor. To me... theres nothing wrong with any of the cars. The sooner people realize 5.0s can trap into the 120s with bolt ons, the sooner they will see the light in most races. Hell mine might go into the 120s with ricer mods. That is all
Ok.
![Popcorn](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
#75
#76
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
LS6 intake
Pacesetter LTs with a single exhaust
Ported stock castings
And you're claiming you can run with ANY similar weight H/C car? You would be LUCKY to see a 120 trap.
I was running down bolt-on LS2 C6s years ago with 380rwhp at 3700lbs.
You need to stop running your mouth.
![Icon Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_rolleyes.gif)
#78
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: S. FL/TX
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It was a guesstimation based on how i have seen your car perform, i would be willing to put money that your car is right around a 120-121 mph trap properly driven and in good conditions.
I think your car performes well for what it is, in my opinion set ups such as yours typically net 118-119 traps....
I think your car performes well for what it is, in my opinion set ups such as yours typically net 118-119 traps....
#80
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I dont understand why everyone says a H/C ls1 that makes 420whp+ should easily trap 120+ and a new bolt on 5.0 making the same power with same weight with far superior gearing cant do it unless its a gutted race car.
To me... that is NOTHING but biast opinions. Hate to say it but the MT82 puts the power down better then any Tremec in existance. They might be weaker, but there gearing is 10x that of the 6060s. That is NOT a biast opinion.
Carry on techers..
To me... that is NOTHING but biast opinions. Hate to say it but the MT82 puts the power down better then any Tremec in existance. They might be weaker, but there gearing is 10x that of the 6060s. That is NOT a biast opinion.
Carry on techers..