Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Bolt on Mach 1 vs bolt on LS1 from a roll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2012 | 02:42 AM
  #41  
lilmiller74's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Grove City, Oh
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Was the ls m6 or auto? It seems it was a auto......either way 40 would suck for him. **** poor ls1 to let a 108mph mach out run him.

Good kill Stoppy
You make more excuses than any person I know, why cant it ever be good run? You even said yourself you may be able to beat me from a dig but not from a roll so why do you even argue trap speeds stupid?..YOU ARE AN IDIOT RICKY BOBBY, now unplug your computer and go play in traffic!
Old 12-04-2012 | 02:55 AM
  #42  
corysmach1's Avatar
Teching In

 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by lilmiller74
You make more excuses than any person I know, why cant it ever be good run? You even said yourself you may be able to beat me from a dig but not from a roll so why do you even argue trap speeds stupid?..YOU ARE AN IDIOT RICKY BOBBY, now unplug your computer and go play in traffic!
Haha thats so true. He has an excuse for everything man. Even if the chevy wins it never wins by enough according to him.
Old 12-04-2012 | 03:00 AM
  #43  
lilmiller74's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Grove City, Oh
Default

According to him his 131 car will beat my 127 car from a dig at the track but it has a chance to beat is car from a roll....but yet a 108 mach cant beat a supposed 112 camaro from a roll? contradict yourself much buddy
Old 12-04-2012 | 03:04 AM
  #44  
lilmiller74's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Grove City, Oh
Default

And I think your home track in hillbillyville needs to have there timing system re-calibrated! Prolly a big reason for you and you buddy to run magical times there and go to MIR and loose 5 mph....
Old 12-04-2012 | 07:38 AM
  #45  
s346k's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 1
From: johnson co.
Default

*dumbassity. not dumbassness.

good kill. I'd like to think I'd fare better against a similar mod Mach. no track times lately, but my ta went 109 w a lid and weld in 80 series.
Old 12-04-2012 | 07:47 AM
  #46  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 486
From: Winchester, VA
Default

You guys gonna jack up another thread by goin way of topic?

Were talking stockish cars here. I know how they run. Stoppys car trapped 108 and has alot of gear on a tire. I trapped 107-108 bone stock on a 2.2 60. The guy he ran should get near 110. 40 roll on a m6in 2ndgear sucks with stock gears....if you have ever drivin one you would know that. Now Stoppy says even with bolt-ons the guy may only get with in a car of him.....lol Notches mild bolt-on car would put like 6 on him.

I don't know how your car runs lilfag. But I can about guarantee with your trap you will be trying to catch me. You see you dumbasses have never said any details about why your car only did 127 (assuming it would do more according to you)and have never said a et. Personally I think 127 is pretty good for a idiot like you. Who the hell wants a moron like you driving around a missle?

Last edited by HioSSilver; 12-04-2012 at 07:54 AM.
Old 12-04-2012 | 07:52 AM
  #47  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 486
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Originally Posted by lilmiller74
And I think your home track in hillbillyville needs to have there timing system re-calibrated! Prolly a big reason for you and you buddy to run magical times there and go to MIR and loose 5 mph....
Well actually I have not been back to MIR since I made some changes, it a 3hr trip vs 45min to Mason Dixon. As I have said before it may go slower elsewhere.....or it may go faster. Clearly from the vid from MIR it can go faster.
Old 12-04-2012 | 07:57 AM
  #48  
lilmiller74's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Grove City, Oh
Default

I used to have one and a 40 roll in first gear was just fine, same with my vette with stock 3.42 gears a 40 roll is just fine. Way better than a 15 roll would ever be....my car will prolly never go as fast as yours at the track but on the street from a roll ii would bet i probably put 4 or so cars on you.

Same as the case here the faster trapping car got walked!
Old 12-04-2012 | 07:59 AM
  #49  
lemons12's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (71)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 2
From: Winchester, TN
Default

Nice Kevin, expected.

40mph in a stock ls1.. LOL WTF is he on? Shifting immediately after the hit or bottom of second.

I would have still started the race in 1st... But would have asked for a 30-35 (1st) or a 50-55 (2nd) if he was trying to get an advantage.
He started in 2nd but I still think you would have walked it.

Most people don't shift fast enough to start in 1st gear above 35mph.
Old 12-04-2012 | 08:03 AM
  #50  
lilmiller74's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Grove City, Oh
Default

I def agree a 30 or 35 in first is a sweet spot for sure
Old 12-04-2012 | 08:07 AM
  #51  
HioSSilver's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,977
Likes: 486
From: Winchester, VA
Default

Originally Posted by lilmiller74
I used to have one and a 40 roll in first gear was just fine, same with my vette with stock 3.42 gears a 40 roll is just fine. Way better than a 15 roll would ever be....my car will prolly never go as fast as yours at the track but on the street from a roll ii would bet i probably put 4 or so cars on you.

Same as the case here the faster trapping car got walked!
Not if you think a 40 in 2nd is good. So where are you gonna magically create this 4mph short coming you have?
Originally Posted by lemons12
Nice Kevin, expected.

40mph in a stock ls1.. LOL WTF is he on? Shifting immediately after the hit or bottom of second.

I would have still started the race in 1st... But would have asked for a 30-35 (1st) or a 50-55 (2nd) if he was trying to get an advantage.
He started in 2nd but I still think you would have walked it.

Most people don't shift fast enough to start in 1st gear above 35mph.
You see ...lemons knows.

I think the driver of the camaro just picked cause it sounds cool and he reads about 40 rolls on the internet...lmao
Old 12-04-2012 | 08:12 AM
  #52  
TT427's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 372
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Default

Can someone explain how a car that is proven by slips and eyewitness account to et slow for the trap is going to get "pulled" on a roll by slower cars? Is this new and improved ricer math?
Old 12-04-2012 | 08:15 AM
  #53  
lemons12's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (71)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 2
From: Winchester, TN
Default

Originally Posted by TT427
Can someone explain how a car that is proven by slips and eyewitness account to et slow for the trap is going to get "pulled" on a roll by slower cars? Is this new and improved ricer math?
You aren't getting it... The slower cars are only slower on paper and will win on the street because they ET slow for the mph.


O wait... Icwutwedidthar.
Old 12-04-2012 | 08:16 AM
  #54  
lilmiller74's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Grove City, Oh
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Not if you think a 40 in 2nd is good. So where are you gonna magically create this 4mph short coming you have?

You see ...lemons knows.

I think the driver of the camaro just picked cause it sounds cool and he reads about 40 rolls on the internet...lmao
Where did i say a 40 roll in second is a good roll? I would never do a 40 in second if i didnt have to.
Old 12-04-2012 | 08:36 AM
  #55  
TT427's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 372
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
You aren't getting it... The slower cars are only slower on paper and will win on the street because they ET slow for the mph.


O wait... Icwutwedidthar.
Oh, I was never anygood at maths.... Thank god for the interwebz!
Old 12-04-2012 | 08:42 AM
  #56  
corysmach1's Avatar
Teching In

 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
You guys gonna jack up another thread by goin way of topic?

Were talking stockish cars here. I know how they run. Stoppys car trapped 108 and has alot of gear on a tire. I trapped 107-108 bone stock on a 2.2 60. The guy he ran should get near 110. 40 roll on a m6in 2ndgear sucks with stock gears....if you have ever drivin one you would know that. Now Stoppy says even with bolt-ons the guy may only get with in a car of him.....lol Notches mild bolt-on car would put like 6 on him.

I don't know how your car runs lilfag. But I can about guarantee with your trap you will be trying to catch me. You see you dumbasses have never said any details about why your car only did 127 (assuming it would do more according to you)and have never said a et. Personally I think 127 is pretty good for a idiot like you. Who the hell wants a moron like you driving around a missle?

Are point is not to hijack these threads.....are point is your an idiot and claim you know everything. Hell now your saying you know how mach1s perform? Why......beacuse you saw one that underperformed? You think every single car in america runs just like the one you have raced? No. There are freak cars out there with very good drivers that may have ripped the doors off the same mach you raced with the same mods.....hell i have raced tons of Fbodies and they all run different man its just the way it is.
Old 12-04-2012 | 08:44 AM
  #57  
TT427's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 372
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by lilmiller74
Where did i say a 40 roll in second is a good roll? I would never do a 40 in second if i didnt have to.
Post 48 it is implied... Sorry, realized you said in 2nd

Last edited by TT427; 12-04-2012 at 09:01 AM.
Old 12-04-2012 | 08:46 AM
  #58  
s346k's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 1
From: johnson co.
Default

40 in 2nd gear stock m6 ls1 sucks ***. anything first gear is spin city. I'd spin first like crazy then spin some more after shifting. now with these long tubes and gears it will destroy the street tires anywhere in second.
Old 12-04-2012 | 09:05 AM
  #59  
TT427's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 372
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by s346k
40 in 2nd gear stock m6 ls1 sucks ***. anything first gear is spin city. I'd spin first like crazy then spin some more after shifting. now with these long tubes and gears it will destroy the street tires anywhere in second.
Agreed, coming from a 98 with SLP LT and LM1 that was probably never tuned when it was installed. Thats with 285/40/18 rubber.
Old 12-04-2012 | 09:10 AM
  #60  
S8ER95Z's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 51
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by s346k
40 in 2nd gear stock m6 ls1 sucks ***. anything first gear is spin city. I'd spin first like crazy then spin some more after shifting. now with these long tubes and gears it will destroy the street tires anywhere in second.
Hell even with my POS setup first gear is useless (all the way to 55mph) spin spin spin spin spin... give me a 70 roll please.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 PM.