C5 Z06 takes on BMW M3 Dinan 4.6 Stroker Kit
01-17-2013, 08:38 AM
#22
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chesterfield (St. Louis), MO
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-17-2013, 08:51 AM
#24
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm going to be cutting my bump stops and BFH'n my inner fender w a few other things this weekend. I'll be sure to post some new pics w the rims after this cold spell we are supposed to get in Chicago this upcoming week.
01-17-2013, 09:35 AM
#25
10 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-17-2013, 09:55 AM
#26
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm really not that surprised. Its just amazing why someone would spend that kind of money, for that kind of return, when it comes to performance.
01-17-2013, 10:55 AM
#28
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: san antonio
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-17-2013, 12:58 PM
#31
Teching In
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Raleigh Area, NC
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What was the trap on both cars? Again awesome runs and NICE Z!
I have a friend with an E92 with cai + exhaust- M6- that was talkin smack. So I sicked the big girl on him. At the time my only mods were headers, CAI, and tune. Now I cant get him to run again...he scared now! LSx motors FTMFW!
01-17-2013, 01:05 PM
#32
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-17-2013, 03:55 PM
#34
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: heading South East on Bakalakadaka street
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
No kidding.
LOL Now I get what you meant in that thread when you said "Everyone is inferior" to you. Thats seems to be the mentality of that entire forum. LOL
01-17-2013, 06:22 PM
#36
quick search on the m3 sites.
Boring and stroking the engine alone costs $22,999!
That does not include the pulleys, software, high flow air intake, high flow throttle bodies, free flow exhaust, etc
That does not include the pulleys, software, high flow air intake, high flow throttle bodies, free flow exhaust, etc
completely retarded..
01-17-2013, 07:44 PM
#39
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why is everyone on that board so hung up on saying power under the curve? These cars are racing...on the highway...its not like theyre powering out of corners or lugging around at a low mph and rpm and punching it..
01-17-2013, 07:55 PM
#40
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol, mine was a bit sarcastic to play into the stereotype..
BUT.. That was the wrong thread, i meant 40pages in this one:
http://bimmerboost.com/showthread.ph...ost-Comparison
I own an S65 powered M3 obviously.. and boosted they are nasty. but N/A they are not bad, but nothing to fear.
the stroker kits do come complete kits, but you get between 420-440rwhp, and yes, its $20k + for them..
VAC Motorsports, close to me, has actually just built a few that are really tempting as they seem to be more aggressive and better power and reliability.. but i like boost..
most of these dyno 330 (me) -350rwhp stock, and 370-390 rwhp bolt on
boost is a much better option for these cars, they respond well, but of course, the s/c kits are overpriced as well..