Boss 302 Laguna Seca vs 2012 Charger SRT8
#71
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: heading South East on Bakalakadaka street
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Agreed, but you know... read a story in a magazine, it becomes fact worldwide.
LOL Thats what confused the hell out of me.
#73
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Id like to see that 392 in a light weight vehicle... i bet you it would do some damage. Close to the damage of the ls7.
IMO in terms of NA: LS7, 392, Boss 5.0, LS3, Coyote 5.0, LS2, LS6, 6.4 srt8, LS1
IMO in terms of NA: LS7, 392, Boss 5.0, LS3, Coyote 5.0, LS2, LS6, 6.4 srt8, LS1
#74
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Conyers, Georgia
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#75
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That looks pretty good.....but I think you should put the L99 just ahead of a ls2 IMO. They really seem to turn on with a tune/or/and cam change.
Last edited by HioSSilver; 02-14-2013 at 05:00 PM.
#76
#79
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
that i would disagree with. For multiple reasons. CFM vs CC cylinder head flow, strong rotator...TIVCT to make up for lack of cubes. Its durability is the highest tested of any other motor to be produced by ford (not that thats saying much). Theres a reason it costs almost as much as the ls7
#80
Launching!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
IMO, if were just talking about the overall potential of an engine I dont know if its fair to put the Boss 5.0 in front of the LS3, considering the LS3 has made more power in a naturally aspirated combo.