Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

'12 3.7l v6 vs. H/C 347ci Fox

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2013, 03:15 PM
  #61  
Teching In
 
MACHXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by automach1
If it is door to door then you should sell the mach
I always give props to the other car..even if it was a Hugo....which will beat me also.

About being respectful up front...but when the race goes down, then I become the competitive *******.
Old 05-17-2013, 03:44 PM
  #62  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MACHXLR8
I always give props to the other car..even if it was a Hugo....which will beat me also.

About being respectful up front...but when the race goes down, then I become the competitive *******.
I understand. I mach with your mods she be running 11s not 12s
Old 05-17-2013, 04:13 PM
  #63  
Teching In
 
MACHXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by automach1
I understand. I mach with your mods she be running 11s not 12s
Wish it could..maybe with a real driver like you or Stoppy. I can't drive for sh*t. I baby this thing to much at the track.
Old 05-17-2013, 05:15 PM
  #64  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Fooln Ya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
Like I said good run with a decent running Bolton 2v

2012 3.7 Mustang vs 2004 Mustang bolt on 2v - YouTube
Well, that car is a FULL Bolton 2v, with trans swap and weight reduction. AND I had 610lbs of driver/passenger vs 300ish...

The 2v guy know what would happen both solo. Hell, he wants to run me from a dig on the juice

As for the 3vs, I think mod for mod I am a pretty good run for one. Theres not a WHOLE lot of stock 3vs running 13.7s or better, especially with 2.73s.

Heres a vid against a 3v with the same mods as me, PLUS Nitto dr's. We both had intake/tune/3.73's/exhaust.

Please excuse the mother n law lmao...
Old 05-17-2013, 05:35 PM
  #65  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fooln Ya
Well, that car is a FULL Bolton 2v, with trans swap and weight reduction. AND I had 610lbs of driver/passenger vs 300ish...

The 2v guy know what would happen both solo. Hell, he wants to run me from a dig on the juice

As for the 3vs, I think mod for mod I am a pretty good run for one. Theres not a WHOLE lot of stock 3vs running 13.7s or better, especially with 2.73s.

Heres a vid against a 3v with the same mods as me, PLUS Nitto dr's. We both had intake/tune/3.73's/exhaust.

Please excuse the mother n law lmao...
2012 3.7l v6 m6 Mustang vs. 3v s197 m5 Mustang - YouTube
Your car runs well man no doubt. The v6 has came along way and 4v is the way to go but it is no match for a good running mach with the same mods. As far as the rest of it goes I think the v6 is a good match up for a good running Bolton 2v. Local car with similar mods as you went 12.8 @ 106 in his Bolton 2v and another went 12.7 @ 108.

Last edited by automach1; 05-17-2013 at 05:41 PM.
Old 05-17-2013, 05:56 PM
  #66  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Demon 383
Mach 1 will bring the pain to a 3.7 V6 stock for stock. No contest there.

I mean, if that were indeed the case, that means an LS1 is only slightly faster than a 3.7 which we all know is not the case.
LOL...with the ls1 being slightly faster then a Mach 1 would be even up with the v6.
Originally Posted by automach1
I understand. I mach with your mods she be running 11s not 12s
Originally Posted by MACHXLR8
Wish it could..maybe with a real driver like you or Stoppy. I can't drive for sh*t. I baby this thing to much at the track.
MachX....don't listen to that dipshit. He's got a bolt-on gt500 that he can't get out of the 12's and he's telling you that your car should be capable of 11's with 200 less rwhp. He can't drive a hard dick.
Originally Posted by Fooln Ya
Well, that car is a FULL Bolton 2v, with trans swap and weight reduction. AND I had 610lbs of driver/passenger vs 300ish...

The 2v guy know what would happen both solo. Hell, he wants to run me from a dig on the juice

As for the 3vs, I think mod for mod I am a pretty good run for one. Theres not a WHOLE lot of stock 3vs running 13.7s or better, especially with 2.73s.

Heres a vid against a 3v with the same mods as me, PLUS Nitto dr's. We both had intake/tune/3.73's/exhaust.

Please excuse the mother n law lmao...
2012 3.7l v6 m6 Mustang vs. 3v s197 m5 Mustang - YouTube
2v wanting to spray on ya....lmao. I would give up at that point if I were him and trade it off on the v6 car.
Old 05-17-2013, 06:10 PM
  #67  
Registered User
 
z28th1s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm the OP's dad, here is a little info on my '11 3.7. These cars when modded AND driven properly are very good matches for MOST similar modded '99-'01 Cobras , '05-'10 GT's and '03-'04 Mach 1's.

http://www.lundracing.com/lund-racin...-quarter-mile/
Old 05-17-2013, 06:12 PM
  #68  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z28th1s
I'm the OP's dad, here is a little info on my '11 3.7. These cars when modded AND driven properly are very good matches for MOST similar modded '99-'01 Cobras , '05-'10 GT's and '03-'04 Mach 1's.

http://www.lundracing.com/lund-racin...-quarter-mile/
I don't know what the deal is with the v8 ford guys. They seem to be really butt hurt over a fine little package imo.

Has anyone did any FI work on these v6 cars?
Old 05-17-2013, 06:18 PM
  #69  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
LOL...with the ls1 being slightly faster then a Mach 1 would be even up with the v6.



MachX....don't listen to that dipshit. He's got a bolt-on gt500 that he can't get out of the 12's and he's telling you that your car should be capable of 11's with 200 less rwhp. He can't drive a hard dick.


2v wanting to spray on ya....lmao. I would give up at that point if I were him and trade it off on the v6 car.
Biggest dipshit in this section trying to call somebody else a dipshit. Pot meet kettle.
Old 05-17-2013, 06:21 PM
  #70  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,934
Received 423 Likes on 335 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by automach1
Biggest dipshit in this section trying to call somebody else a dipshit. Pot meet kettle.
You are a complete moron......there is no excuse for you and the amount of stupid you carry. You talk ****.

I back my **** up.
Old 05-17-2013, 06:21 PM
  #71  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z28th1s
I'm the OP's dad, here is a little info on my '11 3.7. These cars when modded AND driven properly are very good matches for MOST similar modded '99-'01 Cobras , '05-'10 GT's and '03-'04 Mach 1's.

http://www.lundracing.com/lund-racin...-quarter-mile/
All things equal it is not even close with a mach.
Old 05-17-2013, 06:22 PM
  #72  
Registered User
 
z28th1s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I don't know what the deal is with the v8 ford guys. They seem to be really butt hurt over a fine little package imo.

Has anyone did any FI work on these v6 cars?
CFM (Central Florida Motorsports) in Florida has a Yellow Blaze automatic 3.7 that ran in the high 10's with a Procharger and has now switched to a single turbo. The times on both setups were similar. IIRC 10.8x's @ 124-127 MPH.
Old 05-17-2013, 06:24 PM
  #73  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
You are a complete moron......there is no excuse for you and the amount of stupid you carry. You talk ****.

I back my **** up.
Where is this 800+whp ls6 with a 2.3 blower on 16lbs? I would say 95 percent of the people in this section think you are a moron. I talk **** and back it up. If you think otherwise you are more then welcome to drive that pile down here and find out for yourself.
Old 05-17-2013, 06:25 PM
  #74  
Registered User
 
z28th1s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
All things equal it is not even close with a mach.
Just like with anything there are going to be cars that are faster, but my car will hold up well against MOST bolt-on Mach 1's!
Old 05-17-2013, 06:31 PM
  #75  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z28th1s
Just like with anything there are going to be cars that are faster, but my car will hold up well against MOST bolt-on Mach 1's!
All I am saying is the same mods in a mach will net high 11s very low 12s @ 112+ cutting similar 60fts. That is over a second faster and imo that's not close.
Old 05-17-2013, 06:33 PM
  #76  
Registered User
 
z28th1s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
All I am saying is the same mods in a mach will net high 11s very low 12s @ 112+ cutting similar 60fts. That is over a second faster and imo that's not close.
How is that over a second faster than a 12.63 @ 109 MPH??
Old 05-17-2013, 06:38 PM
  #77  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z28th1s
How is that over a second faster than a 12.63 @ 109 MPH??
I meant half. Still not close. I have seen them go 11.8 @ 115 @ 3400lbs with similar mods which is almost a full sec faster.
Old 05-17-2013, 06:38 PM
  #78  
ASSuming On The Tree
 
audacious nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ask him what his nitrous Mach 1 ran.
Old 05-17-2013, 06:43 PM
  #79  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by audacious nick
Ask him what his nitrous Mach 1 ran.
Well into the 11s I would hope. We had a local guy had a intake, xpipe, gear, converter, 100 wet shot mach going 11.2s @ 119 @ ~3500lbs
Old 05-17-2013, 06:52 PM
  #80  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
GtoSpd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MACHXLR8
I'd like to find a V6 with a couple of mods to run..I think it would be door to door. They do run good from what I have seen. Amazing what can be done with NA 6 cylinder motors today.
OP is a buddy of mine, lives up in Lynchburg, so if you guys want to put something together I'm sure we can make it happen! His car and yours should honestly be a good match from any speed. He's trapping 107-109, so even from a roll it should be a fair run. Would love to see it!

Fooln, you know my opinion on that run with the Fox. I think he figured he had ya, you surprised his ***, so he sprayed. Just way too dramatic of a difference between the two runs to be anything else.

That SRT-4 guy is an azzhole btw..


Quick Reply: '12 3.7l v6 vs. H/C 347ci Fox



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 PM.