GTR vs 5.0 vs Gt500
07-05-2013, 04:50 AM
#61
I would guess 99% of people would agree a c5z kills the looks of a gt500 AND me out handling you would be 100% fact. Plus the car is getting a varam ram air intake and fast 92/90 setup this week with tune. Car should do low 11's and trap 120+. I forget what does your car run automach?
07-05-2013, 08:54 AM
#64
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-05-2013, 09:00 AM
#65
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would guess 99% of people would agree a c5z kills the looks of a gt500 AND me out handling you would be 100% fact. Plus the car is getting a varam ram air intake and fast 92/90 setup this week with tune. Car should do low 11's and trap 120+. I forget what does your car run automach?
Handling? lol Oh I forget ever since the gt500 man handled the zl1 chevy guys are all about some handling 
Wow so you are going off track times that you have not even made yet.
Let's say you do get that turd to run that number with your granny *** shifting. Still doesn't mean you would win as it wouldn't be the first low 11sec 120+ mph car I have ran and beat 
So like I said you are going to need a lot more car then a tired bolton c5z.
07-05-2013, 10:12 AM
#68
I would guess 99% of people would agree a c5z kills the looks of a gt500 AND me out handling you would be 100% fact. Plus the car is getting a varam ram air intake and fast 92/90 setup this week with tune. Car should do low 11's and trap 120+. I forget what does your car run automach?
I pulled the front bumper off a H/C/I C5Z at our local 1/8th mile. He out 60ft'd me... Then I proceeded to walk him hard.
If you plan on running with some pulley/tune and up Shelby's, I suggest you get a little more than an intake, fast, and tune. OR you will be dissapointed when you run into the wrong one.
07-05-2013, 10:33 AM
#70
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-05-2013, 10:37 AM
#71
07-05-2013, 11:01 AM
#72
Tracks times only reflect the quality of the launch traction wise. Trap speed is a factor of the weight of the vehicle and the hp to the wheels. Track times are all over the place, even for C5Z's, C6Z's and Shelbys. Pulley/Tune Shelbys with a good leave at the light can run mid-low 11's. I ran 99mph in the 1/8th with only pulley/tune in my car, and spinning my 20" drag radials to an awesome 1.9 60ft. C6Z's run that in the 1/8th. C5Z's will see alot of tailights.
I pulled the front bumper off a H/C/I C5Z at our local 1/8th mile. He out 60ft'd me... Then I proceeded to walk him hard.
If you plan on running with some pulley/tune and up Shelby's, I suggest you get a little more than an intake, fast, and tune. OR you will be dissapointed when you run into the wrong one.
I pulled the front bumper off a H/C/I C5Z at our local 1/8th mile. He out 60ft'd me... Then I proceeded to walk him hard.
If you plan on running with some pulley/tune and up Shelby's, I suggest you get a little more than an intake, fast, and tune. OR you will be dissapointed when you run into the wrong one.
07-05-2013, 12:09 PM
#74
ASSuming On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-05-2013, 01:09 PM
#76
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know how track times work lol. My (bolt-on) stock internal 99 z28 ran 11.9@110 witch is faster start to finish than automach's 600hp pile of ****! And that was a $7,000 car! And my c5 actually has vararam intake, fast 92/90, LT's, H/Flo cats, dr's, and tune. C5z's with less mod's have trapped 126-128 in the 1/4 mile.
07-05-2013, 01:13 PM
#77
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
