C6 corvette vs c63 amg
08-11-2013, 12:33 AM
#45
Launching!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
http://m.motortrend.com/roadtests/co..._srt_viper_gts
08-11-2013, 04:58 AM
#47
See what I did there?
08-11-2013, 10:49 AM
#51
My experience between a c63 AMG (no experience with a p31) and an LS2 GTO says the GTO is the faster car. Local c63 I raced dynoed 348whp on my dyno 100% stock. My buddies ls2 GTO with shorties, air intake, catless JBA pipes, and magnaflow catback on the stock tune made 367whp. That GTO is a good bit quicker then the C63. Now remove maybe 15-20whp for its mods. My money is on that it is still faster. Heres my experience with a C63. I gave him a car and the hit in this race. I was making a little less power too.
08-11-2013, 12:50 PM
#54
My experience between a c63 AMG (no experience with a p31) and an LS2 GTO says the GTO is the faster car. Local c63 I raced dynoed 348whp on my dyno 100% stock. My buddies ls2 GTO with shorties, air intake, catless JBA pipes, and magnaflow catback on the stock tune made 367whp. That GTO is a good bit quicker then the C63. Now remove maybe 15-20whp for its mods. My money is on that it is still faster. Heres my experience with a C63. I gave him a car and the hit in this race. I was making a little less power too.
Boss VS Stock C63 AMG Race 1 - YouTube
Boss VS Stock C63 AMG Race 1 - YouTube
2012 AMG weighs 3800 and makes 453/441 crank prior their "development" model which bumps HP to 480.
We all know a C6 vette is more than capable even with just a few bolt ons, but its not gonna outrun all the piggies out there even when they are stock.
08-11-2013, 01:23 PM
#55
Evan stop picking on porky Mercs, lol.
2012 AMG weighs 3800 and makes 453/441 crank prior their "development" model which bumps HP to 480.
We all know a C6 vette is more than capable even with just a few bolt ons, but its not gonna outrun all the piggies out there even when they are stock.
2012 AMG weighs 3800 and makes 453/441 crank prior their "development" model which bumps HP to 480.
We all know a C6 vette is more than capable even with just a few bolt ons, but its not gonna outrun all the piggies out there even when they are stock.
Last edited by evangto87; 08-11-2013 at 02:17 PM.
08-11-2013, 02:15 PM
#56
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-11-2013, 07:25 PM
#59
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-11-2013, 07:37 PM
#60
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Didn't they (SRT) have to come up with a more expensive, special edition Viper to finally outrun the ZR1? Cause the '13 Viper surely wasn't able to get the job done.
http://m.motortrend.com/roadtests/co..._srt_viper_gts
http://m.motortrend.com/roadtests/co..._srt_viper_gts
The TA is LESS expensive than the GTS that the ZR1 beat.
From Motor Trend
"It starts at (around) $120,500, nicely splitting the difference between the regular Viper ($102,000) and the GT-esque GTS ($125,000)."
Its still irrelevant cause at the end of the day its Viper>ZR1. Period.
Am i impressed by the the TA edging out the ZR1? No. I think the GTS should easily have beaten it and the TA should rape it. Although there wouldnt be a TA if the GTS would have beatin it to begin with.
Its sad that a "all new" Viper can barely edge out the outgoing generation Vette but I was just proving a point that your statement about everything>chrysler was based off of butthurt emotions.
Bottom line. Chryslers flagship performance car has beatin GM's so in that regard Chrysler>GM
